annabelle_bronstein
VIP Member
Oh god the swimsuit shot taken in 90% darkness hahaha I hope she SIZED UP to allow for the holiday piss tank
She does literally look like a five year-old in this picture.Ahh look at her eating her food all by herself! Stabbing that melon with a fork like a big girl!
Did John cut it up for you Lorna?
They are two absolutely shambling amateurs who got extremely lucky - one of the TITs took a still from the tv programme where he was actually holding the camera upside downSerious question - how on Earth are these images signed off as website shots? The quality is TERRIBLE (even if you ignore the filtering which should be illegal to use professionally as a business)
Obviously a man with no training and whos career was a numbers based one is hardly gonna be an artistic genius but are they taken with an iphone? Surely thats not camera quality? Its clear Gary Glitter Mark 2 is living in his own personal hell - its not exactly how you’d dream your life turning out, taking an Instagrammers photos & steaming her clothes
Contrast to Stacey Solomans shoot - full team, professional photographer, hair & make-up. Theyre not even using a reflector? They cant be if its just the 2 of them…
It really feels like AF/ITS are keeping her on due to her follower count but have lots of newer signings they are actually focused on. I really do think her days are numbered with them (and rightly so)
She's boasted before about the camera they use. A proper digital camera, supposedly. The still shot below is from that appalling Breaking Fashion programme, and this is how I imagine them looking whenever they go anywhere to "shoot". Properly ridiculous and comical. The fact that her shots so often have a manhole cover / dustbin / cigarette butts / DHL van / pigeon poop in the background is testament to his (and hers) complete lack of creative ability to style a shot and also the ability to recognise which shots need to be binned. She, on the other hand, thinks she is très chic with her hats and using them to hide her face, but actually she just looks like some wierd woman with no head. The two of them are complete and utter clowns.Serious question - how on Earth are these images signed off as website shots? The quality is TERRIBLE (even if you ignore the filtering which should be illegal to use professionally as a business)
Obviously a man with no training and whos career was a numbers based one is hardly gonna be an artistic genius but are they taken with an iphone? Surely thats not camera quality? Its clear Gary Glitter Mark 2 is living in his own personal hell - its not exactly how you’d dream your life turning out, taking an Instagrammers photos & steaming her clothes
Contrast to Stacey Solomans shoot - full team, professional photographer, hair & make-up. Theyre not even using a reflector? They cant be if its just the 2 of them…
It really feels like AF/ITS are keeping her on due to her follower count but have lots of newer signings they are actually focused on. I really do think her days are numbered with them (and rightly so)
Never in a month of Sundays. Been debated ad nauseum. She's 39 and he's 59. She's never wanted children, and there's nothing wrong with that (I'm 44 and have never, ever liked the idea of having children. I'd be a terrible mother.) Over and above that, she's too self-absorbed to have children. Imagine her having to get up at 3am to see to a crying baby, or not being able to drop everything and go to London or Santorini on a whim. As someone who has never wanted children, I always wonder why people have an expectation that women/couples must procreate to be considered 'normal'. Soooooo many people have debated on this forum in the past about whether or not she's pregnant or if they'll ever have children, and I always wonder what prompts the question. Do people find it strange that she doesn't have/want children? Because if that's the case, that makes me strange too.Do you think they'll have babies? Or does he have a grown up family x
Ha I stand with you cheesey - I've known from a really young age that I didn't want children and fortunately I've never really been given a hard time about it (Noone would dare lol) Hey we've got our luvly hambags and shoos to take care of right??Never in a month of Sundays. Been debated ad nauseum. She's 39 and he's 59. She's never wanted children, and there's nothing wrong with that (I'm 44 and have never, ever liked the idea of having children. I'd be a terrible mother.) Over and above that, she's too self-absorbed to have children. Imagine her having to get up at 3am to see to a crying baby, or not being able to drop everything and go to London or Santorini on a whim. As someone who has never wanted children, I always wonder why people have an expectation that women/couples must procreate to be considered 'normal'. Soooooo many people have debated on this forum in the past about whether or not she's pregnant or if they'll ever have children, and I always wonder what prompts the question. Do people find it strange that she doesn't have/want children? Because if that's the case, that makes me strange too.
Sermon done. Sorry.
I might start pushing my Birkin around in a rusty pram whilst wearing a sized-up nylon looney gown billowing out behind meYep, I'm with you @RaspberryCheesecake & @annabelle_bronstein. I've never wanted children and I, too, felt like that from a young age. There have been rare cases where I've been asked rather personal questions about my childless state (certainly questions I'd never have dreamed of ever asking anybody) and on those rare occasions, it's been clear that I've been considered somewhat strange. Yes, Miss Annabelle, I also like my hambags & shoos, although the day I start to name them or call them "my babies" you have my permission to shoot me.
I didn't even realise she was 39 I thought she was 35 ish lolNever in a month of Sundays. Been debated ad nauseum. She's 39 and he's 59. She's never wanted children, and there's nothing wrong with that (I'm 44 and have never, ever liked the idea of having children. I'd be a terrible mother.) Over and above that, she's too self-absorbed to have children. Imagine her having to get up at 3am to see to a crying baby, or not being able to drop everything and go to London or Santorini on a whim. As someone who has never wanted children, I always wonder why people have an expectation that women/couples must procreate to be considered 'normal'. Soooooo many people have debated on this forum in the past about whether or not she's pregnant or if they'll ever have children, and I always wonder what prompts the question. Do people find it strange that she doesn't have/want children? Because if that's the case, that makes me strange too.
Sermon done. Sorry.
Don't forget to shove your whiskey bottle in the pram in readiness for when you stop at the park bench. And hang onto your straw hat if it's windy.I might start pushing my Birkin around in a rusty pram whilst wearing a sized-up nylon looney gown billowing out behind me
^^^this. Me too! Some of the questions are jaw dropping.Yep, I'm with you @RaspberryCheesecake & @annabelle_bronstein. I've never wanted children and I, too, felt like that from a young age. There have been rare cases where I've been asked rather personal questions about my childless state (certainly questions I'd never have dreamed of ever asking anybody) and on those rare occasions, it's been clear that I've been considered somewhat strange. Yes, Miss Annabelle, I also like my hambags & shoos, although the day I start to name them or call them "my babies" you have my permission to shoot me.
When I look at that picture, all I do is cringe at how scorching her filtered, bare little bum cheeks must be, sitting on that grey cement in 38 degree heat, just for the sake of trying to look chic and 'a la mode'.
What is she saying? Her clothes are making her sweaty? His don’t? Does she read back what she’s saying? Does he not say anything? Does ITS not say anything???