The Royal Family #46

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I don’t think people understand that issuing a kill notice on a picture is very rare!

These are respected news agencies,, not the daily fail.
It essentially means’s that the photo was changed to such an extent that it bears little or no resemblance to the original. It is therefore deliberately designed to mislead.

They are simply lying to us, and don’t give a tit because the British press will protect them.
 
Miss polar said:
I don’t think people understand that issuing a kill notice on a picture is very rare!

These are respected news agencies,, not the daily fail.
It essentially means’s that the photo was changed to such an extent that it bears little or no resemblance to the original. It is therefore deliberately designed to mislead.

They are simply lying to us, and don’t give a tit because the British press will protect them.
Click to expand...
That is factually incorrect.

The standards as set out by the AP:
Minor adjustments in Photoshop are acceptable. These include cropping, dodging and burning, conversion into grayscale, and normal toning and color adjustments that should be limited to those minimally necessary for clear and accurate reproduction (analogous to the burning and dodging previously used in darkroom processing of images) and that restore the authentic nature of the photograph. Changes in density, contrast, color and saturation levels that substantially alter the original scene are not acceptable. Backgrounds should not be digitally blurred or eliminated by burning down or by aggressive toning. The removal of “red eye” from photographs is not permissible.

The image did not meet these standards, but was submitted to the AP and distributed prior to the AP calling it. It really is that simple.
It's not proof the image was some kind of Frankenstein's monster of multiple images, nor is there any statement of intent implied in the AP's statement.
 
Suzesnooze said:
🤣 I think it’s the other way around. I can definitely see Harry eventually cheating on Meghan and probably with a blonde which was always his type. Plus he’s hardly caring and kind writing that book and slagging off his family members.
Click to expand...

Who knwos if he will cheat in the future, but he isnt the brother that HAS cheated unlike william 🙃 and with a woman that looks like a slapped arse. Bit too much him doing a tell all (i only listened to half the book on audible) but who knows he probably had his reasons and his family arent exactly angels
 
wanderingrose said:
William is like his dad (a cheat) and harry is like his mum (caring and kind)
Click to expand...
Oh lord…. look you are entitled to your opinion but Harry is a snake - they turn up at awards , preach and don’t actually donate to charity much- the royal racist shite put out by scobie, himself and markle they chose to only clear the names of HMTQ and Prince Phillip…. they could have stopped the kate, charles, camilla, the corgi’s are racists and chose not to-
I doubt William is a cheat- after him being essentially his mothers crutch I doubt he would inflict that on his own children- he has live that shitshow once already-
Diana played the press and in that respect yes Harry is like her- he is not caring in the least with all his leaks to the press through Scobie.., he adds to the families misery - zero caring - he only sees Dollar signs
 
Onetwofour said:
Yes because of course they are all unidimensional people. It's not black and white. They all have their flaws to a certain degree.
Click to expand...

True, i dont follow the royal family news and dont follow harry and meghan but have heard last yr about william cheating.
---
Doodlebug005 said:
Oh lord…. look you are entitled to your opinion but Harry is a snake - they turn up at awards , preach and don’t actually donate to charity much- the royal racist shite put out by scobie, himself and markle they chose to only clear the names of HMTQ and Prince Phillip…. they could have stopped the kate, charles, camilla, the corgi’s are racists and chose not to-
I doubt William is a cheat- after him being essentially his mothers crutch I doubt he would inflict that on his own children- he has live that shitshow once already-
Diana played the press and in that respect yes Harry is like her- he is not caring in the least with all his leaks to the press through Scobie.., he adds to the families misery - zero caring - he only sees Dollar signs
Click to expand...

Theres tons of evidence of william cheating. Harry and meghan i dont follow so only going by what i seen at the beginning of the marriage. Guess im gonna have to read their thread here on tattle 🫠
 
Diana was so caring and kind she stalked the wives of the men she slept with and harassed them, spread horrific rumors about other women, fired every nanny out of jealousy, and used her elder child as an emotional crutch which is frankly child abuse...

Harry is so caring and kind he threw his family under the bus, shared intimate secrets about their bodies, and lied on American television through his teeth whilst his supposed beloved grandfather was dying...
 
wanderingrose said:
True, i dont follow the royal family news and dont follow harry and meghan but have heard last yr about william cheating.
---


Theres tons of evidence of william cheating. Harry and meghan i dont follow so only going by what i seen at the beginning of the marriage. Guess im gonna have to read their thread here on tattle 🫠
Click to expand...
No there isn’t one scrap of evidence- there is gossip- which Giles Corren 🐍- admitted he invented and retracted- show your evidence- omit the gossip🙄 My brothers cousins exwifes sisters hairdressers dog groomers boss said Willy is a cheat- isn’t actually evidence
 
thegirlscout said:
I thought so too but the tree is in the original?
Click to expand...
The photographer did a video yesterday refuting this. He said he is always asked leading questions in interviews about H&M. The interviewer said something about the photo actually being taken in a meadow and then moved in photoshop to be in front of the tree. The photographer chose to ignore that statement and just spoke about how it was taken with love and full of joy etc
I think because he didn’t categorically deny that at the time it became fact to some people the tree was photoshopped in but that was never the case. It was just an interviewer making it up to fish for information
 
Doodlebug005 said:
No there isn’t one scrap of evidence- there is gossip- which Giles Corren 🐍- admitted he invented and retracted- show your evidence- omit the gossip🙄 My brothers cousins exwifes sisters hairdressers dog groomers boss said Willy is a cheat- isn’t actually evidence
Click to expand...
Giles Coren did not make this up. He CONFIRMED an existing rumour which was already circulating in the foreign press and on twitter. Then retracted. He didn’t start the rumours
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top