Simon Harris #4 He lost 5 stone, and gained 457 thousand pounds

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
VielleFemme said:
A pub is also a really inappropriate venue for a local authority to engage with vulnerable people, some of whom are likely to have issues with alcohol etc.
Click to expand...

I was mithering about this to myself. I guess if the aim is to get it out amongst the, I don't know how to put this, "non-service user proportion" of the population (i.e. just boost general awareness amongst the general population about mental wellness rather than engaging with those at the sharper end of mental illness, iygm?) it's possibly, not a good idea, but not a not bad idea.

But I do agree with you, considering the massive overlap between alcohol and mental health issues, it's a bit on the nose. And it also potentially shuts out anybody with cultural or religious reasons to abstain from alcohol who might not feel comfortable going into a pub...

And actually, no, now I've thought this out, considering councils aren't exactly lacking in bookable spaces that can be used for community activity, why would you hold it in a pub????
 
lilykestrel said:
But I'm getting the feeling these groups are also all used and picked back up and put down as part an interconnecting network and back-up to drive views and impressions to the next project. Do you get what I mean? Maybe I'm just being unnecessarily pedantic but it gets my goat a little, because it's not really establishing a long-standing service or resource. Maybe that's not what they were going for. Idk.
Click to expand...

I'm with you on this. There's a very strong suggestion of double-counting, misrepresentation of what is meant by 'impressions' and the blinding of service commissioners with social media bullshit.

There's no substance to any of these campaigns. Half a million pounds' worth of digital landfill.
 
He always has been a total blagger in terms of his clout on social media. I’m sure when he’s down the pub talking to the only person that will listen to him, he’ll tell them all about his joke that went “viwal” with hundreds of thousands of views. What he won’t say is that it’s the sports direct mug joke that he’s been repeating every 2 months since 2016 and it’s a cumulative total.

Double, triple, quadruple counting and overselling the importance of views is how he’s managed to pull the wool over the eyes of so many gullible people. He’s a one trick pony. Rant about the torwies and bwexit being bad all day and that will get you a mid-size following from tribal FBPE types. Try and do something else and you end up with Together for Suffolk. A combined 17 Facebook likes on their last 10 posts 😳.

I get more than that on 1 Tattle post 😂
 
Pkershaw said:
He always has been a total blagger in terms of his clout on social media. I’m sure when he’s down the pub talking to the only person that will listen to him, he’ll tell them all about his joke that went “viwal” with hundreds of thousands of views. What he won’t say is that it’s the sports direct mug joke that he’s been repeating every 2 months since 2016 and it’s a cumulative total.

Double, triple, quadruple counting and overselling the importance of views is how he’s managed to pull the wool over the eyes of so many gullible people. He’s a one trick pony. Rant about the torwies and bwexit being bad all day and that will get you a mid-size following from tribal FBPE types. Try and do something else and you end up with Together for Suffolk. A combined 17 Facebook likes on their last 10 posts 😳.

I get more than that on 1 Tattle post 😂
Click to expand...

I would like to pay you hundreds of thousands of pounds to manage my social media engagement!
 
lilykestrel said:
I mean, considering the number of people who followed the Man Behaving Dadly page, if an impression can be gained by somebody having the 'autoplay videos' setting on on Facebook and scrolling past him sharing it, I bet that could jump the numbers up a notch
Click to expand...

This is true. His pages were freaking everywhere on social media. I often got his content suggested by Facebook and Twitter, plus I’m sure he used to run paid ads for tit like Dadly. I’ve probably unwittingly given him hundreds of impressions just because it keeps popping back.

Do we know if he runs any of the crappy banter/British memes accounts? His tweets show up on those kinds of accounts a lot. Wouldn’t surprise me if he has a few going still.
 
Mr Krabs said:
This is true. His pages were freaking everywhere on social media. I often got his content suggested by Facebook and Twitter, plus I’m sure he used to run paid ads for tit like Dadly. I’ve probably unwittingly given him hundreds of impressions just because it keeps popping back.

Do we know if he runs any of the crappy banter/British memes accounts? His tweets show up on those kinds of accounts a lot. Wouldn’t surprise me if he has a few going still.
Click to expand...
It puts you off following any of them.
 
He hasn’t closed “Are Cuntry” yet.

These are grown men doing this and there’s loads of it. There has to be something wrong with these people’s brains. This is not healthy.

IMG_9717.jpeg
 
I really hate this idea that we are all obliged to give every political viewpoint - no matter how repugnant - air time because "you can't just live in an echo chamber of your own views!" So I can kind of see their frustration. But there's a big difference between that vs maintaining an entire Facebook group for years on end making fun of people based on a warped / "straw man" perception of their views
 
witchofwestbyfleet said:
I really hate this idea that we are all obliged to give every political viewpoint - no matter how repugnant - air time because "you can't just live in an echo chamber of your own views!" So I can kind of see their frustration. But there's a big difference between that vs maintaining an entire Facebook group for years on end making fun of people based on a warped / "straw man" perception of their views
Click to expand...

It’s just a lack of tolerance. The very thing they accuse the other side of. They’re all hypocrites and they’re all guilty of thinking that because someone has a different opinion to them, they must automatically be thick and bad intentioned.

“your viewpoint on immigration is different to mine so you’re a racist and I’m going to show how stupid you are by logging on to Simons totally deranged Facebook group and typing, WE IS NOT IN YOURUP ENNIMORE SO SEND THE SINGERZ BACK TO RIBENA!!!! in shouty capital letters”……You’re not the rational one there, dude.
 
Pkershaw said:
It’s just a lack of tolerance. The very thing they accuse the other side of. They’re all hypocrites and they’re all guilty of thinking that because someone has a different opinion to them, they must automatically be thick and bad intentioned.

“your viewpoint on immigration is different to mine so you’re a racist and I’m going to show how stupid you are by logging on to Simons totally deranged Facebook group and typing, WE IS NOT IN YOURUP ENNIMORE SO SEND THE SINGERZ BACK TO RIBENA!!!! in shouty capital letters”……You’re not the rational one there, dude.
Click to expand...

No one actually said anything he claims ... yes, some people can be quite unhinged about immigration but that's true of any political issue (you need only look at the Echo or any other local paper and someone's going to be absolutely frothing at the mouth about parking or littering or tourists etc.) He's labelling a whole bunch of people ignorant and hateful without even the most basic idea of what they've said/done - and HE voted for Brexit! What a hypocrite
 
Pkershaw said:
He hasn’t closed “Are Cuntry” yet.

These are grown men doing this and there’s loads of it. There has to be something wrong with these people’s brains. This is not healthy.

View attachment 2689047 q
Click to expand...
condescending, snobbish cunts. Many people who feel the brunt (probably not the best word) of mass immigration is those in under-funded, under-privileged areas. The councils put these people here without adding anything to the services in the areas - interpreters for schools, doctors appointments, hospital treatment, dental appointments, etc.
Many of the people who express the sentiments these friendless fucks are taking the piss out of here, feel abandoned by politicians who promised them improvements and never delivered. They then see asylum seekers (many are single males) being housed quickly in their areas, and see them having access to services and support they can't get for themselves. i'm not putting a popular opinion forward here, i know that, but in my view i can very much see why there's resentment on so many levels. this doesn't happen in well-off areas.
That they pass this off as a joke, whilst making clear they think anyone who doesn't hold the same view as them is thick, is cuntish.
 
Lazarus said:
condescending, snobbish cunts. Many people who feel the brunt (probably not the best word) of mass immigration is those in under-funded, under-privileged areas. The councils put these people here without adding anything to the services in the areas - interpreters for schools, doctors appointments, hospital treatment, dental appointments, etc.
Many of the people who express the sentiments these friendless fucks are taking the piss out of here feel abandoned by politicians who promised them improvements and never delivered. They then see asylum seekers being housed quickly in their areas, and see them having access to services and support they can't get for themselves. i'm not putting a popular opinion forward here, i know that, but in my view i can very much see why there's resentment on so many levels. this doesn't happen in well-off areas.
Click to expand...

Or to people that earn six-figure incomes from their local council for running crappy Facebook groups
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top