Mumsnet #25 I'm on a boat I need a poo, I trolled 2 forums about a shoe, I think we all have Dejavu.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I think NatashaDancing is itching for a fight. She tried it with me that day but soon realised I wasn't as invested as her. she was looking down her nose at people for posting links to Next (which were within OP price range) whilst posting stupidly expensive clothes that didn't match what OP was asking for. And then she was another thread talking about how she's a PARTNER at a big firm, hmmmmm.
 
girlinbrum said:
I think NatashaDancing is itching for a fight. She tried it with me that day but soon realised I wasn't as invested as her. she was looking down her nose at people for posting links to Next (which were within OP price range) whilst posting stupidly expensive clothes that didn't match what OP was asking for. And then she was another thread talking about how she's a PARTNER at a big firm, hmmmmm.
Click to expand...

She is completely full of tit, and far from wanting to help women feel good, she goes on the attack if a woman posts about her improved confidence. She was an absolute tit to an OP recently who had a boudoir photography session and liked the pictures, and tried to make out that she was a child abuser if she hung one of the prints in her bedroom (to be fair, she wasn't the only one).

She also criticises any woman who likes a style that men might find attractive, even if the woman is clear that she just likes it herself, not because of how she thinks men will respond. Might explain why everything she suggests is so plug ugly.

She's not a partner in a big firm, she's a delusional fantasist. And I wouldn't mind, if she weren't also spiteful, nasty and on a clear mission to make women hate themselves.
 
you know it’s a poor choice when even MN warn you a necklace looks like a vag….very labia-esque
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0187.jpeg
    IMG_0187.jpeg
    47.2 KB · Views: 52
Our Natasha fits the profile of using the internet to forge an alternate reality where you actually have a BIG job, some actual autonomy and exquisite taste in obscure, difficult to source, high class clothes. I strongly doubt any of it is real. Her dialogue is often a bit stiff and stilted, and she's not very self aware (she doesn't grasp humour or intuit very well) so perhaps she struggles socially?
I think she also struggles to dress her body type and possibly resents those who don't, ie conventionally sexy clothes.
She did admit to this, vaguely, somewhere recently.
 
melonpane said:
Our Natasha fits the profile of using the internet to forge an alternate reality where you actually have a BIG job, some actual autonomy and exquisite taste in obscure, difficult to source, high class clothes. I strongly doubt any of it is real. Her dialogue is often a bit stiff and stilted, and she's not very self aware (she doesn't grasp humour or intuit very well) so perhaps she struggles socially?
I think she also struggles to dress her body type and possibly resents those who don't, ie conventionally sexy clothes.
She did admit to this, vaguely, somewhere recently.
Click to expand...

Well, apart from the "exquisite taste" bit.
 
melonpane said:
Our Natasha fits the profile of using the internet to forge an alternate reality where you actually have a BIG job, some actual autonomy and exquisite taste in obscure, difficult to source, high class clothes. I strongly doubt any of it is real. Her dialogue is often a bit stiff and stilted, and she's not very self aware (she doesn't grasp humour or intuit very well) so perhaps she struggles socially?
I think she also struggles to dress her body type and possibly resents those who don't, ie conventionally sexy clothes.
She did admit to this, vaguely, somewhere recently.
Click to expand...

As CEO of Ocado, I do find people like this very sad. I rarely go on Mumsnet as I'm very busy running Ocado and spending my enormous salary on designer clothes (mainly overalls and things with huge bows that partially block my vision as I love them so much) and £500 weekly manicures but when I do I often see these people living out online fantasies and I show them to my gorgeous husband who runs his own business and we laugh so much the echoes go through our 14 bedroom mansion for hours. It really is a silly thing to do as people know you're lying.
 
Has anyone else noticed how preachy mumsnetters have become about the Zoe nutrition programme? Now whenever someone says they are struggling with their weight it seems to always be recommended. They all seem to conveniently forget to mention that it costs £300 to sign up to and then £59 per month ongoing. One op has replied to someone who suggested it saying thanks but now thanks and now they have come back arguing about why everyone should do it

Maybe they are all spammers who work for Zoe
 
The thing with the Zoe thing is even Zoe are jumping on a bandwagon that most experts with actual education/degrees/masters in nutrition etc are saying is pointless. But most of us do not need a monitor to know our sugar spikes after eating. That’s normal, we don’t need to track it and obsess over it. If our bodies do their jobs our organs will deal with it

The gut micro biome is really interesting but again it’s in its infancy of research and far too soon to even try and tailor individual diets to our own.

Agree with @uberobliqueif it’s new, someone with ‘Dr’ Infront of it ( yes you Michael Mosley!) or there’s a hint of crazy science behind it they jump on it like a trampoline and then everyone SHOULD ABSOLUTELY be following whichever fad they disguising their disordered eating as.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top