That's saved me 4 hours!! Shame I was looking forward to it, shan't bother now!Thanks for the spoiler, you've saved me at least 2 hours
That's saved me 4 hours!! Shame I was looking forward to it, shan't bother now!Thanks for the spoiler, you've saved me at least 2 hours
Ah I didn't realize the same writer had written 'Mum'. I thought that was brilliant. Defo worth a watch and I might start it again tonight actually.Honestly I thought it was dogshit. Just terrible.
As mentioned the writer created Him & Her which I love, also Mum which is bloody brilliant (and on Iplayer if you didn't see it - with Lesley Manville and Peter Mullan. I'd highly recommend giving that a watch). So based on that pedigree, I expected so much more from this.
The 2 main characters were completely unlikeable. I get that being married for years is about the mundanity of life. But as said the 2 of them seemed like total strangers. They didn't have that ease in each others company which people married for that long have - even the ones who hate each other!
Unlike the writer's other work, it didn't seem well observed at all, quite the opposite. The law firm where the wife worked was ridiculous, as a lawyer I can say that no firm would operate with only 1 lawyer and that many support staff, especially when said lawyer (her boss) never did any actual work, the firm would have gone bust in a week. Ditto her 'business ideas' it was all painfully unrealistic.
I persevered for all 4 episodes thinking at some point it would get better. It didn't.
Interesting re the YT video.For anyone feeling as cheated as I was there is a good video on YouTube where the writer and NW and SB discuss the show. He goes into his reasons there but I still think it was dull as dishwater and a complete waste of 2 (3 if you count James Bolam) exceptional actors. I think he's trying to say the genius of the show is in the boring day to day lives but that's not what I watch telly for (I've got my own very boring life ta very much) and I certainly don't class that as entertainment.
I’m with you! And we’re in the minority lol I agree that nothing happened and it was “boring” but it was subtle. Sean Beans character was fantastic, the way he played Ian’s struggle with being redundant and his awkwardness was really moving in my eyes. The scene in the gym bought me to tears. It was weird to see Henry Lloyd hughes in a “grown up” role lol I haven’t seen him since inbetweeners. All in all, I thought it was really good. It was for thinking, not for action.Crikey I absolutely love it. I'm only 2 episodes in and I feel so much has happened really subtly. This is indeed about the mundaneness of married life but also that the surface chat and seemingly contentedness is hiding so much from the past.
Sean Bean playing someone so different in an anorak is difficult watching especially with the leisure centre girl. But that's the point of a good actor and storyline. It should make us uncomfortable!
Maybe I like it becoming I am fascinated by what makes long term relationships work as I am watching my own going down the pan right now!
Omg Donovan! I knew I recognised him!I’m with you! And we’re in the minority lol I agree that nothing happened and it was “boring” but it was subtle. Sean Beans character was fantastic, the way he played Ian’s struggle with being redundant and his awkwardness was really moving in my eyes. The scene in the gym bought me to tears. It was weird to see Henry Lloyd hughes in a “grown up” role lol I haven’t seen him since inbetweeners. All in all, I thought it was really good. It was for thinking, not for action.
Try Broken. Absolutely brilliant.Never thought much of Sean Bean until recently (can never forgive his Patriot Games accent) but thought he was absolutely outstanding in the prison thing he did with Stephen Graham.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.