Johnny Depp and Amber Heard #11

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
The ACLU (I think it was them anyway) said in their testimony that JD was named in the original draft but it was then removed. They made it very clear who it was about.
Yes there's an email chain in evidence. Heard actually wanting it to more leaning etc. Did she not say in her testimony that it wasn't just about Johnny. So admitting it was about him.
Also 'Mr Hollywood' don't recall his name, the guy who literally brokered every film. He said that Hollywood took it to be Depp. So the audience took it that way.
The thing she is denying the most is the title online because that says sa. And she knows no one believes that. To me she admitted malice due to the timing of it. Reaching a larger audience.

Depp needs all the jury to believe him, Heard just one I guess.
 
That would be changing their story though, wouldn't it? Didn't she say he kicked the bed, or his foot/boot did the damage when he was attacking her. Would the risk another change to another story?? Or they may just be trying to say that it's simply JDs knife and nothing to do with the damage to the bed.
This ☝🏼 AH absolutely did say he caused that damage with his boot. I believe her and her team have never even mentioned the pocket knife. It was actually Camille that brought it up and AH said she couldn’t be sure what was on the bed. Or words to that effect.

Are we able to watch it live at all and where?
YouTube. Law & Crime Network
 
Maybe the judge meant to say that they were done with the trial by Labour Day?
Yeah that’s maybe it. I missed the start of the trial so don’t know if it was mentioned publically already. It’s going to either be done and dusted very quickly or dragged out forever. I hope it’s pretty quick for the poor sods so they can get back to their real life.
 
The reason AH is being "ridiculed" is because she is ridiculous. It's got little to do with DV, and more to do with how false, fake and completely over the top her actions on the stand are.

People are judging her based on what they are seeing. She was believed at first, people did give her the benefit of the doubt, wrongly most would agree after seeing the evidence.
 
How do we know its a day later?

I shall enquire of the interdweebs for you!

So, I had to do some time travel there! Thought I'd get an easy answer but nahhh, of course there is some jiggerypokery afoot! I am guessing because of international clock etc the dates vary a little on press articles but the images are still 24 hours apart and the majority of press dates say the TRO was the 27th.

Article below says TRO Bruise day was 27th and No bruise day was the 28th. 27th was a Friday, 28th was a Saturday and apparently she went onto Amanda D C's house party after the laughing lawyers meeting with Rocky.

I'd love a nose at the image meta data 🧐🤓

The weird thing from a researchers point of view in the below is that there appears to be a description at the start of the article that says 'no NY papers'. Also I can only find most of this in Canadian/Irish or Scottish press, oddly Brit and US less so. This happens often with msm stories that are, shall we say, positioned to be misleading. If I had time I'd be trying to work out which media Murdoch owner of The Sun owns, has allegiances with and the differences in reporting but I aint so I wont.

Press re 27th - 'Amber Heard was photographed leaving a Los Angeles courthouse on Friday'

Press re 28th - 'Heard, who was clasping a laptop computer, arrived at the office at around 3.30pm on May 28, 2016, and left at about 7.30pm. She was spotted chatting to her attorney Samantha Spector and hugging another member of her legal team inside the building. The blonde star, who was not wearing her wedding or engagement rings, threw her head back in a fit of giggles as she walked armed in arm towards the car with her pal. The bruise on her face, which she claims was inflicted by Depp, appeared less visible than it had been the previous day at court.'


Apparently, JD also has 'surveillance film and witnesses to show the actress, was unmarked “each day of the preceding week”.'

TRO Day

Amber-Heard-2479438481.jpg



Day After TRO

Where's that bruise gone?! We'd have some yellow at least no?

amber-laugh-811909452.jpg



HEARD911.jpg



Amanda was supporting Turdle but then pulled out after hearing the tapes and she claimed AH “misled” her.

It was 'revealed in a legal declaration filed in June in a separate case that AC had a change of heart after hearing a series of audiotapes in which Heard admits to clocking Depp in the jaw and verbally abusing him.

She said she was “appalled and shocked to hear how Amber was speaking to Johnny,” the outlet reported.
'

Someone ask Amanda D C what was under Turdles hair fgs!
 
I have further musings

Court cases Turdle has been involved with so far

  1. The drinky driving as a teen stuff when her mate died? Not sure it went to court? Seen the police arrest pix though, girls got her jaw on full jut!
  2. The film stuff, apparently Turdle had a court ding dong in the spare 13 months of no givey money to dying kids. It regarded all the tits out tits not out on that film I cant 'member name of that she lied to JD about what naked contract she had signed and JD was said to be jealous of her flasheroonies
  3. The TRO
  4. The Sun stuff in Larndan cor blimey cocker
  5. The Embryos with Elon - Did they only keep one? There will of been more than one created? Are there mini TurdleMusks on ice? tit.
  6. This one now

Are there more?

Is there some kind of 'court addiction' featuring munchausens where people make illness/bruises/drama up for attention???

Do we know who’s testifying today?

It'ssssss Johnnyyyyyyyyyyyyy!
 
Last edited:
The reason AH is being "ridiculed" is because she is ridiculous. It's got little to do with DV, and more to do with how false, fake and completely over the top her actions on the stand are.

People are judging her based on what they are seeing. She was believed at first, people did give her the benefit of the doubt, wrongly most would agree after seeing the evidence.

No, the reasons Amber Heard is being ridiculed is complicated and not constructed to just one single reason.

there’s probably an element of yeh, at face value she is over dramatic and it’s entertaining. That’s a very small part of it though. Johnny Depp is a little ridiculous too. He’s had meandering rambling testimonies, he’s a grown man doodling and eating jelly beans at one of the most famous trials of the decade. He’s making jokes about “jars of dirt” when confronted with accusations about drug abuse. But he is exposed to vitriol for it? Not in the same way at all. This is an extremely harrowing trial, about very difficult and severe topics. It’s included sexual assault, violence, substance abuse. It’s not appropriate for either party to be ridiculed no matter how “ridiculous” they come across.

there’s also probably an element of public outrage at a sense of having been duped by Heard and championing perceived injustices against Depp

Heard fits into the stereotype of the “femme fatale” the attractive, overtly sexual, dangerous female (she literally gets typecast as this), so it’s easier to demonise her in this trial. She fits cleanly into the common public perception of what an “immoral” woman looks like.

there’s definitely an element of misogny - putting a woman who publicly caused the downfall of a powerful man, back in her place. The independent touched upon it in the below article. Again, it isn’t seeking to establish facts surrounding the trial and who may or may not be guilty of what - it’s specifically examining the social drives of the behaviour and the impact;

 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top