I’m A Celebrity, Get Me Out Of Here 2022 #8

Who do you want to win?

  • Chris

    Votes: 22 3.2%
  • Jill

    Votes: 186 27.3%
  • Mike

    Votes: 117 17.2%
  • Sue

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Owen

    Votes: 92 13.5%
  • Baba

    Votes: 28 4.1%
  • Matt

    Votes: 169 24.8%
  • Seann

    Votes: 43 6.3%
  • Boy George

    Votes: 25 3.7%

  • Total voters
    682
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
So which precisely which part do you think is incorrect? That MH is trying to carve out a new career, that many of the of UK public are gullible or that Boris's flaws have been tolerated as he's been seen as a "lovable buffoon"?
The post is incorrect in saying that there is a connection between those who support Matt Hancock being the same as those who overlooked Johnson's many flaws. For my part I absolutely hate Johnson, and am not a Tory voter.

Secondly, the post refers to how much MH gave himself to eat, so I pointed out that he would not be the first person to do that either in camp or outside of it and further that when compared with other campmates selfish acts, this is hardly the crime of the century.
 
I don't think he was condemned to hell and leaving your crap in the sink for your family is one thing but expecting a relative stranger to do your dirty work is a bit rich. Sue was right to call him out on it, and the little weasel seemed quite surprised that she did.
I suspect it was an oversight on his part, just doing what he normally does. His "couldn't you just rinse it down, was probably stating the obvious solution and not an expectation as such. She just wanted to expose him, and he knew that.
 
I suspect it was an oversight on his part, just doing what he normally does. His "couldn't you just rinse it down, was probably stating the obvious solution and not an expectation as such. She just wanted to expose him, and he knew that.
Not the first time he has "forgotten" to leave the bowl ready for the next user though. You would think he would be a little more aware having had this pointed out previously.

The post is incorrect in saying that there is a connection between those who support Matt Hancock being the same as those who overlooked Johnson's many flaws. For my part I absolutely hate Johnson, and am not a Tory voter.

Secondly, the post ( refers to how much MH gave himself to eat, so I pointed out that he would not be the first person to do that either in camp or outside of it and further that when compared with other campmates selfish acts, this is hardly the crime of the century.

It may not be the "crime of the century" but certainly demonstrates very clearly that he looking out for Number one! (That wasn't my post btw)

I haven't really warmed to many of this year's campmates. I hope that the winner will either be Mike or Jill, possibly Owen.

Chris, Baba and Seann are lazy. BG has shown a very unpleasant side.
 
Last edited:
Is anyone else really struggling to warm to Mike? He seems a bit cold to me. I didn't like his palling up with Sue either.
I really like Mike. He hasn't any edge to him and has been happy to get stuck in to whatever is needed. He may be a little aware of his position with the RF and perhaps is a little more mindful that he doesn't cause embarrassment but the edits have certainly shown that he has a sense of humour and doesn't take himself too seriously.
 
I can't get past the image of him nicking an apple and hiding behind a tree. 😆 It's so funny.
😁 I've got a sneaky exclusive for you 😉
Polish_20221122_131713597.png
 
To be honest I don’t like Matt and I think they’ve been fair about their depiction of him. He is happy to do the trials, he is polite, he’s clearly good at keeping his nerve, but he also can be self-centred and scuzzy (bird poo, leaving his shaving crap behind, sneaking food etc). he picked his own ball for the lottery and I think he was a bit dismissive of Owen during their challenge. Even if you think someone is stupid I don’t think it’s necessary to patronise them etc. With that logic it’s totally fine for the camp mates to talk to Matt the same way on account of his many failures.

I also agree with whoever it was that said he was the fall guy. IMO that happens with the tories - they close ranks and periodically kick out a fall guy for the public to be distracted by. Usually the fall guy has to have done something bad and look a bit stupid so they make a PR mess as they fall. it keeps people off the tail of others the party wants to retain. Matt Hancock was perfect as a fall guy - hes actually screwed up and looks a bit hopeless in the press. I understand why they do it bc it clearly works. Notice how they all fall in rank and just say it’s boris’ “time” to go. despite being very positive about his party, MH’s being roasted by them for going on IAC.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top