Harry and Meghan #70 Two weddings, lots of lies, someone's telling porky pies

How long do you think Harry and Meghan will last?

  • 3 years and they'll breakup in 2021

    Votes: 156 14.2%
  • 4-5 years

    Votes: 530 48.2%
  • 6-7 years

    Votes: 171 15.5%
  • 8-9 years

    Votes: 41 3.7%
  • Until death does part

    Votes: 202 18.4%

  • Total voters
    1,100
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I do hope someone in BP is reading these threads and relaying to HM The Queen exactly what we think of Haznoballs and Minge.

I know she won’t but wouldn’t it be so fabulous if HM The Queen came out with a statement listing all the problems with Meagain, particularly her snooping and trying to take photos, her bullying and the fact Archie is Farchie and a surrogate. We can but dream.
 
But William also appeared to be an angry man for years.... This one definitely did get therapy and it worked!
William learned how to live with it and understand it. No-one moans about not seeing their children because they are seen in appropriate settings doing exceptionally normal things. Obviously they have been lucky enough to meet the Attenborough and the Berry. However, both settings worked and the kids were simply kids. William and Kate do what Diana did - involve them in things at an early age to value their position. Harry was maybe too young and his father too distant.
 
Best thing the RF can do is not stoop to their level and not to comment. It will drive Meghan crazy. She's a phoney and is just annoyed she didn't get her way (to take the bits of royal life she likes and disregard the rest). You can't marry a senior royal and then ask to do the role as lower level ones. Harry is as much at fault here.Can the pair of them just bleat off into the supposed simple life they want now please.
 
I definitely think a lot of Meghan wanting to do the interview was to stick the knife into Kate, more so than others! She holds a lot of resentment that everyone looks up to Kate and she is well liked in the media and seen this as her chance to tarnish that. She did say in the interview that she wasn’t saying this stuff to paint Kate in a bad light, but what other way could it have been perceived? Meghan was very, very clever in the way she spoke about Kate, making sure to mention she’s accepted her apology etc. If she wholeheartedly accepted her apology privately, she shouldn’t even be discussing it on the interview. She really did see it as a big opportunity to stick the knife into Kate
She’s jealous that Kate has taken well to becoming royalty and that she’s liked within the family because they know she isn’t out for her own personal gain. Kate is the perfect senior royal - always polite and respectful to people, never airs her own opinions, charitable, maternal and follows protocol which shows she respects TQ and what the monarchy stands for.
 
Does anyone have any thoughts on why Camilla wasn’t mentioned? Not once did I see any inference to her.

I wondered this too. I think that despite the affair- William and Harry got on really well with Camilla. I genuinely believe that she has been good to them and their wives and she’s not the bitch that people like to make out. He’s probably watched her get torn to shreds daily. I think Harry knew if she said anything wrong about Camilla she would get ten times over especially by the Americans. Despite the fact this is all really grim I really don’t think he himself knew it would end up as bad as this- he does come across a bit dim.
 
The idea of Megs going to the palace HR for a mental health issue is absurd for two reasons. Firstly she ranks above HR in the totem pole. When you have a work grievance you seek help from those with more power/influence than you to enact change. In her situation the appropriate higher ups would be her employers Charles or the Queen, not the people below her working as her staff. Secondly her feeling suicidal isn't actually a work responsibility. Its a private medical matter that should have been taken up with a trained medical professional, not the poor staff that she uses as her emotional punching bags.

The mental health angle while pregnant is just another check point in the Archie was born by surrogate list for me. If she was pregnant herself she would have been screened throughout the pregnancy for mental health triggers and those acted on swiftly. Its literally part and parcel of regular pregnancy care.
 
100% agree with this. People predicted she’d do a tell all with Oprah as soon as they saw her at the wedding (despite not being friends with either the bride or groom). True to form she has, less than 3 years after they got married.

where next? Another tell all interview? She was only in the family for a couple of years, soon the information will be out of date and the tide of public opinion will start to wonder why she’s rehashing old ground, she can only look more and more desperate.
what has she now got to offer? Neither of them are of particular interest.

she played her only card too soon. I think she’ll break up with Harry in a year or so amid the harsh criticism and blame the media.

she’ll go on to marry someone even wealthier (maybe an oil baron), while referring to herself as a duchess.

I used to think the comments about her planing her way out from the start were OTT but having Oprah and James Cordon at their wedding, was an interesting move and they’ve confirmed they planned to leave six months in. I’m starting to think Megan had her plan much earlier, she just included Harry six months after she’d gotten married.

I think if she intended on staying with Harry longer term then she would’ve held off with the interview. This interview is a sign that a divorce is on the horizon.He even looked uncomfortable, like hed been prodded and coerced into responding to some of the questions. A victim of narcissism clinging on and doing whatever it takes to keep the narc happy, if there every was one
I think she timed the interview so that it coincided with pregnancy, shortly after the miscarriage one-pager (thank you Chrissy Teigen for that helpful melodramatic slightly murderous reminder) and just after the patronages were stripped. I think it was brought forward because the whole megxit/patronnages discussions and decisions were brought forward to end of feb rather than end of March due to Chris Ship leaking that an interview was being planned. I think that the original timing was end of March to coincide with the announcement of a full cut by the queen.... Megsy still knocked up but bigger moonbump so upping the ante on the optics of harassing a pregnant meggy. I am surprised that Harpo didn't go on about that - but as she hasn't had kids, maybe that would have appeared awkward.
 
I definitely think a lot of Meghan wanting to do the interview was to stick the knife into Kate, more so than others! She holds a lot of resentment that everyone looks up to Kate and she is well liked in the media and seen this as her chance to tarnish that. She did say in the interview that she wasn’t saying this stuff to paint Kate in a bad light, but what other way could it have been perceived? Meghan was very, very clever in the way she spoke about Kate, making sure to mention she’s accepted her apology etc. If she wholeheartedly accepted her apology privately, she shouldn’t even be discussing it on the interview. She really did see it as a big opportunity to stick the knife into Kate
She wishes she was Kate. Meghan is a narcissist so is used to positioning herself as the most interesting, intelligent, beautiful woman in the room (even if it isn’t true). Stood next to Kate however it was so blatantly obvious that she just doesn’t have the class, elegance and grace to be where she was.
 
I know that they will consider it more dignified not to respond but the outright lies need to be addressed along with Harry's accusation of racism. If they continue to say and do nothing then guilt will be assumed.

unfortunately it’s hard to say “I’m not racist” in the face of someone calling you racist, especially if you’re a figurehead of a institution which does have imperialist/colonial history.

equally if they engage with MM it becomes her Vs them. And they are a big institution with influence and history and money on their side. She’s a single woman of colour. There is no way they can engage without looking like the bad guy, and without it becoming super tacky.

The RF I’m no a fan of as an institution, but they’ve weathered worse than this. Keeping a dignified silence is sometimes the best you can do (even though it’s galling).

people like Meghan always show their true colours in the enD, sometimes it’s best to give people enough rope to hang themselves with.

at the end of the day they threw mud but not at anyone in particular, so it won’t stick the same way.

history won’t look kindly on this couple, if it pays any attention to them at all
 
I definitely think a lot of Meghan wanting to do the interview was to stick the knife into Kate, more so than others! She holds a lot of resentment that everyone looks up to Kate and she is well liked in the media and seen this as her chance to tarnish that. She did say in the interview that she wasn’t saying this stuff to paint Kate in a bad light, but what other way could it have been perceived? Meghan was very, very clever in the way she spoke about Kate, making sure to mention she’s accepted her apology etc. If she wholeheartedly accepted her apology privately, she shouldn’t even be discussing it on the interview. She really did see it as a big opportunity to stick the knife into Kate
agreed. It was very ciceronian.... "I'm not going to speak ill of my SIL" and proceeds to speak ill of her SIL
 
Black people are their own worst enemies. When a situation or narrative doesn't suit them or play in their favour, they like to pull the race card. They constantly view themselves as victims and live up to the self-fulfilling prophecy. Should Meghan recieve preferential treatment simply because she is mixed race? NO!!!!!!

I think this is a really dangerous and offensive generalisation- like saying all white people are racist.
 
I did a little Googling on how much Harry was left by both Diana and the QM. When Diana died, she left £13m to be split between Harry and William. After death duties, that went down to £8m, so Harry would have inherited £4m on his 30th birthday. When the QM died, she left them £14m, with Harry getting the larger share. Add to that the money he's been given by Prince Charles, and what he and Smegsy got through the Sovereign Grant, and they weren't exactly impoverished before they sulked off to LA.
They will need a lot of income to keep up with the property taxes and never mind the water bill for their mansion. And their security is what estimated at $4M a year? Then there is the gardening staff and horses for Harry unless MM is against that now too. Wait, I’m sure she would allow him some ‘rescue’ ponies. Meaghan spends what $1M on outfits but I guess Haz only needs his one ratty gray suit. The IRS had been circling since they first we married. Honestly there is no way they consulted with any advisors when they took on such a massive unnecessary property. They might be billionaire adjacent but they aren’t next level rich. And if MM makes it 10 years it will all be split in half since California is a community property state.
 
Haz and M’s lies smells Jussie
 

Attachments

  • 22171D98-6266-4ED0-9DF1-B6CFE1786E4C.jpeg
    22171D98-6266-4ED0-9DF1-B6CFE1786E4C.jpeg
    37.8 KB · Views: 37
She couldn't go out for lunch or meet up with friends
.
Poor deprived dear 😭 - or LIAR?
 
Black people are their own worst enemies. When a situation or narrative doesn't suit them or play in their favour, they like to pull the race card. They constantly view themselves as victims and live up to the self-fulfilling prophecy. Should Meghan recieve preferential treatment simply because she is mixed race? NO!!!!!!
I think that’s a bit discriminating. Not all black people have that view - from what I’ve seen, it’s the minority that play that card and the majority can look beyond the past and not blame present day white people for past atrocities.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top