Gregg Wallace

1
Over 50 years ago, I took a shortcut to work through Smithfield Market. Most mornings a guy with a barrow full of pigs’ ears would call out “Morning Rose, get em off” I just used to laugh and roll my eyes.
It wasn’t sexual harassment then, it was banter. Some women would accept it as such. If they didn’t they would sort it out themselves or get a male friend to give the offender a visit.
I think Gregg Wallace is possibly like that man, though obviously worse, he should have been dealt with.
he is an inappropriate , lewd, lecherous idiot of a man who has never gone beyond the age when he should know better. He should be in The Inbetweeneers, where boys have just discovered sex and are trying to be more shocking than their mates.
If he said something to me, I would deal with it myself there and then. If women stood up to him in public, in the moment, he would stop. No use ignoring it and complaining later.
again the BBC is to blame for this. Letting it go on, giving him airtime, paying him probably huge amounts of money.
Everyone letting it slide, for years.
John Torode didn’t like it ? Why didn’t he man-up and do something.
sometimes I think the world is full of wimps.
Gregg Wallace should have had his balls kicked years ago. That would have given him something to think about.
 
I'm glad we are finally entering a society where 'banter' is no longer an acceptable excuse for bad behaviour. It's about time the Greg's (stick your 2nd G up your arse) of the world learned that you don't get away with dismissing women to little more than sexual objects, and humiliating and degrading them for your pleasure, just because you haven't physically done anything. Mental trauma is no less valid than any other variety. I have no doubt every woman here has at least 50 tales of their experiences with men like this. He's always come across as a sleazy prick, if reports like this come out about you and noone is surprised, that tells you everything you need to know.

I will say though, it absolutely is relevant that he was abused as a child and dismissed by his mother, which seems to have set off a lifetime if neediness and feeling unloved and desperate. It is also relevant if he is on the spectrum, to understand if there's a lack of awareness of social cues etc - or just blatant narcissism and disregard for others. What neither does though is justify his behaviour, but it is really important we look into the history of people like Greg - so we know what needs to change to try and prevent it in the future, or give people the help they need to be better in life.
 
HairyWeeTerrier said:
Over 50 years ago, I took a shortcut to work through Smithfield Market. Most mornings a guy with a barrow full of pigs’ ears would call out “Morning Rose, get em off” I just used to laugh and roll my eyes.
It wasn’t sexual harassment then, it was banter. Some women would accept it as such. If they didn’t they would sort it out themselves or get a male friend to give the offender a visit.
I think Gregg Wallace is possibly like that man, though obviously worse, he should have been dealt with.
he is an inappropriate , lewd, lecherous idiot of a man who has never gone beyond the age when he should know better. He should be in The Inbetweeneers, where boys have just discovered sex and are trying to be more shocking than their mates.
If he said something to me, I would deal with it myself there and then. If women stood up to him in public, in the moment, he would stop. No use ignoring it and complaining later.
again the BBC is to blame for this. Letting it go on, giving him airtime, paying him probably huge amounts of money.
Everyone letting it slide, for years.
John Torode didn’t like it ? Why didn’t he man-up and do something.
sometimes I think the world is full of wimps.
Gregg Wallace should have had his balls kicked years ago. That would have given him something to think about.
Click to expand...
Possibly because when women complain they are told things like “ it’s just Gregg. Ignore him.”
Or are accused of having no sense of humour, being hysterical, frigid.
Then you are classed as a troublemaker and that is reflected on your annual appraisal.
 
Mollywobbles said:
Possibly because when women complain they are told things like “ it’s just Gregg. Ignore him.”
Or are accused of having no sense of humour, being hysterical, frigid.
Then you are classed as a troublemaker and that is reflected on your annual appraisal.
Click to expand...
So true. Same back in the day I had to put up with racist "banter" that I found excruciatingly embarrassing and upsetting. I soon learned that if I didn't laugh along with it I was told I had a "chip on my shoulder". It's the same feeling.
 
IMG-20241206-WA0017.jpg
 
jackolantern said:
I'm glad we are finally entering a society where 'banter' is no longer an acceptable excuse for bad behaviour. It's about time the Greg's (stick your 2nd G up your arse) of the world learned that you don't get away with dismissing women to little more than sexual objects, and humiliating and degrading them for your pleasure, just because you haven't physically done anything. Mental trauma is no less valid than any other variety. I have no doubt every woman here has at least 50 tales of their experiences with men like this. He's always come across as a sleazy prick, if reports like this come out about you and noone is surprised, that tells you everything you need to know.

I will say though, it absolutely is relevant that he was abused as a child and dismissed by his mother, which seems to have set off a lifetime if neediness and feeling unloved and desperate. It is also relevant if he is on the spectrum, to understand if there's a lack of awareness of social cues etc - or just blatant narcissism and disregard for others. What neither does though is justify his behaviour, but it is really important we look into the history of people like Greg - so we know what needs to change to try and prevent it in the future, or give people the help they need to be better in life.
Click to expand...

Thoroughly agree with you here. Greg does come across as needy but also full of himself, he thinks he's God's gift but I wouldn't touch him with a bargepole. I've always thought he was odd and didn't like him, couldn't put my finger on why though.

Does anyone else remember Harry Hill's programme years ago (TV Burp?) where he ripped the piss out of Wallace every week, then a few weeks later Wallace is on the programme sitting there looking ecstatic whilst Harry is taking the piss out of him?? Cringe.

The comments that have got on my nerves this week though have been the usual..... this is unfair, it's a pile on, remember Caroline Flack.... where was people's outrage over grooming gangs...... it's only banter, stop being woke..... why did people wait 14 years to come out with this?

I honestly cannot believe that the BBC have let him behave this way for so many years, what the duck goes on there? They knew all this and they let it go on AGAIN. Who is still to be exposed, because there's got to be others?

Wallace told one woman she was handling a fish like a 'rapist doing foreplay'. That's not banter or acceptable AT ALL. He's said he's on the spectrum and was getting his friends to speak to the media last weekend to remind them of that but it's no excuse. He's a grown man trying to get out of trouble so he's fully aware of what he does IMO.

I can't see this marriage lasting long. He must be like a caged animal at home not able to get out and be a sex pest. His wife must have known what he was like so I'm not sure I can sympathise, sorry to say but she's never looked the full ticket to me. I bet he really thought last weekend that blaming 'middle class women of a certain age' would turn it all around and he'd be back on TV before he knew it which just shows what an appalling thought process he has.

His 3rd and 4th wives he met through twitter after they tweeted him. I bet his private messages on twitter would be an eye opener, he must have been messaging women left, right and centre to meet up.

Last word is for Greg's lawyers who says he does not sexually harass women. Projection, much? I would say the people suffering their client's pathetic behaviour get to decide whether it was sexual harassment. The fact they mentioned sexual harassment says it all.
 
lilyannrose said:
the man should be in some sort of treatment program.
Click to expand...

GB News?
---
Tangerine Cat said:
Wallace told one woman she was handling a fish like a 'rapist doing foreplay'. That's not banter or acceptable AT ALL. He's said he's on the spectrum and was getting his friends to speak to the media last weekend to remind them of that but it's no excuse. He's a grown man trying to get out of trouble so he's fully aware of what he does IMO.
Click to expand...

It's just the same tired old schtick Clarkson does ... then he says: "Oh it's just a joke". :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
A predator may happen to have autism, but autism does not cause their sick behaviour or prevent them from knowing better. How many people, both men and women, with autism manage to live their entire lives without sexually harassing others? I imagine the vast majority. It's sickening that horrible people like Gregg will feed into negative stereotypes of autism.
 
Also just to add, he was obviously well able to tone down/ hold back on his nasty inappropriate comments and behaviour with certain people. So that in itself says that he knew well what he was saying and doing was totally wrong. I never could stand him and I didn't actually know why. Now I do. It's a disgrace that he was allowed to get away with his abhorrent behaviour for so long.
 
Mental elf used as an excuse to slaughter innocent citizens in our streets and excuse pedophilia and grooming (Huw edwards and Schofield) now autism to excuse sexism :mad: bleeping jellyfish

They will always be a problem to society if they can't own up to their perverted and disgusting ways. Using mental illness as a shield. duck off and take your punishment like a man!
 
lilyannrose said:
If anything in the latest Popbitch mail out is true, the man should be in some sort of treatment program.
Click to expand...

Give it time, and it will happen... I'm betting as soon as he realizes the bullshit apologies aren't working, as that is what usually happens.

That's when we will get reports about him going to some rehab/MH place to try and 'sort himself out' which will be enough for the 'everyone deserves a second chance' and 'did he actually do anything that bad?' lot that appeared when the news came out about Schofield.

The rest of us with brains will know he is only doing it because he was told it would get him sympathy and he will come out after and do interviews peppered in bullshit like 'I learnt my lesson' and 'I am so sorry I used to act that way.' only for him to slip up pretty soon after and show he has learnt nothing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top