Sendparent
Chatty Member
Theres a post on her page about it, she did write in her blog on it but shes took the blog down (because it's full of receipts). She said he didn't qualify for it, she had to really push for it at the time, I cant recall all the details, not sure if someone else here will, but I'm sure it was supposed to be a temp measure when he was first discharged? Someone else might remember more.WHAAAAAAT?
Its not fair. She said that the 60 hours a week was set when he wasnt at school, she could have told CHC that although she is appealing the decision to withdraw she agrees he does not need the full 60 hours and although the full 60 is reinstated during the appeal she agrees they're not needed so will happily accept less during the appeal process. Perhaps that would have worked in her favour if CHC felt she was meeting them halfway and being reasonable. Instead shes taking the full 240 hours a month whilst the appeal is done and still moans about "working from home as an unpaid keira". She would have a shock if she had to fight like the rest of the send community plus do everything with 0 hours of keiras.Wait a minute so he’s at school all day and then she has over night carers too?! How is that fair
Last edited: