Reflecting back on how it all panned out, it was gratifying to see Wilf given a taste of his own medicine. He totally lost the plot in the end and was the architect of his own downfall with his ranting, tantrum-y reaction to Kieran's "parting gift". If he'd had his head on straight he would have celebrated more at the Round Table that they'd eliminated the (last?) traitor and then could have downplayed Kieran's vote as a petty-minded personality clash or something.
Personally I think he'd have been better recruiting Hannah. She'd probably have been impressed with his ruthless self-preservation rather than disdainful of him like Kieran was. He could have buttered her up and said he knew he'd get the chance to recruit again and was always going to choose her so they could split the money. It would have been pretty easy for them to influence the gormless Meryl to banish Aaron and then, when he was revealed as a Faithful, to banish Kieran next. But maybe greed and arrogance got the better of him after having seen off his fellow traitors previously?
I suppose it's easy to suggest all that with hindsight and not so likely in the heat of battle. However, I found Wilf's fake reaction of "relief" at being eliminated and claiming he wanted the other 3 to share the money to be completely laughable.
He looked like he couldn't even convince himself of that BS (but of course the largely clueless winners took it at face value at the time).
What a great series this has been. I've found myself discussing it with a wide range of friends and it seems to have totally hooked viewers in, in a way very few new programmes have in recent years.
It'll be very interesting to see what tweaks (if any) they make to the format for the second series. I hope they cast well and avoid any obvious wannabe types, but it's always going to be more tricky when potential contestants will have an understanding of the best ways to progress in the game (though going by the 3 winners, that means being under the radar, slightly dim and easily-led).
