Susie Verrill #6 Calm down Susan, you're hardly Judith Chalmers.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I think he was due to go to Tokyo for the Olympics and do pundit work for Eurosport, so I imagine that would have come with a nice fee. Obviously that didn’t happen so they’ll be feeling the loss of that and who knows if he’ll even go to the rescheduled version this year.
 
He will do pundit work once every two years for Olympics/commonwealth games and the rest of his workload will be appearances, getting £1k to speak at a golf dinner or whatever.

If he invested in property after his initial success then they will be able to live off that. I don’t find the idea of being a landlord particularly ethical though.

They will be comfortable forever, but never in the big leagues. Suspect Susie knows this. She would probably say she doesn’t care, but her Instagram account contradicts that fact. She definitely wants to be a somebody.
 
mrsminiver said:
He will do pundit work once every two years for Olympics/commonwealth games and the rest of his workload will be appearances, getting £1k to speak at a golf dinner or whatever.

If he invested in property after his initial success then they will be able to live off that. I don’t find the idea of being a landlord particularly ethical though.

They will be comfortable forever, but never in the big leagues. Suspect Susie knows this. She would probably say she doesn’t care, but her Instagram account contradicts that fact. She definitely wants to be a somebody.
Click to expand...
I can’t see how that little work would ever be enough to financially sustain a family of 5.
 
Of course she’s now sharing pictures of how she looked after birth and is jumping on the latest debate. Because she just has to doesn’t she!! I’ve really enjoyed reading some people’s take on the topic but somehow she makes it infuriating. HOW is she so condescending?!! She tries to be sarcastic and hilarious at the end of every post and it just doesn’t work does it.
 
BettyCrockerr said:
I can’t see how that little work would ever be enough to financially sustain a family of 5.
Click to expand...
Yes I agree, I don't reckon he commands £1000 PA fees. Maybe if he was a current reality star but he is so irrelevant now.

TV appearances don't usually pay a fee, esp for someone like Greg, even A listers wouldn't be paid; they do it for publicity/promotion of their project.

I think they have some "rentals" as Susie Verrill the racist likes to share, but they are two up two down. They did temp move into one of the "rentals" during the reno (before Rex was born) but it only lasted a couple of months, Susie complained about her neighbours having loud sex so obviously a terrace/semi, and they moved back home so couldn't have afforded to stay out of the building site. Their kitchen is cheap, if they had a good income they wouldn't be fitting a b&q kitchen themselves!
 
I think they will find a magazine deal hard if they wont show her face. They only pay the big bucks for exclusive shots. Former athlete and girlfriend shielding babys face on the cover isnt gonna make them fly off the shelves.
i think she stopped showing their faces because of the ‘death threats’ to try and gain some sympathy but she deeply regrets it as they are the money earners in the instamum world. Even rochelle hulmes ended up selling out to the highest bidder and shes way more famous (and loaded!)
Emma willis doesnt show her kids faces but she does little/no actual ‘mum’ work.
 
OutrageouslyScarlet said:
So relieved susie has explained what we can post online and how to feel about our own bodies..
Click to expand...

Imagine being so absolutely full of your own tit that you think you have to share it with other people. I cannot get my head around it. Loads of us are pregnant, love, crack on. I’m not taking mirror selfies in my underwear and putting them out in the world for everyone to see, like, why would I do that?! That’s just odd.

I’m not ashamed of my body, which is like two of hers stuck together, but neither will you find me twerking in my keks for all to see. Because why would I put that out into the world? Perhaps if I had a giant grief hole somewhere in my soul that I was trying to plug with the approval of others, I might...
 
The fact she’s offering her opinion (that no one asked for) about post birth bodies just shows how inflated her ego is.

I remember her going on about this before. I think it might have been before she had Rex (when I followed her and actually liked her 🙈) but I was beginning to dislike her because she was going on about this narrative online of mums bodies being ruined after childbirth and ‘that’s not always the case guys’🙄🙄. Then proceeds to show pics of her in a bikini saying ‘not all boobs and bodies are wrecked by pregnancy’. I remember thinking ‘I bleeping hate you’ 😂 a tad harsh, yes maybe. But no one needs that point hammered home via social media because for years it’s all we’ve ever seen with celebrities ‘bouncing back’ after having kids, and being celebrated for it. Yes some women’s bodies might not be wrecked but the majority of us will never be the same and the more that message is out there, the less tit women will feel. I’m sorry but a flat stomach a week after giving birth is not normal for 99% of mums so Susie sticking up for a fuckin SUPERMODEL, nah I’m sorry but you’ve lost me and hopefully thousands of others.

Just when you think she couldn’t possibly be any more unlikeable, she comes up trumps once again! 😂

Ps can you tell I’ve just had a strong coffee before writing this 🤪
 
weeweegie said:
The fact she’s offering her opinion (that no one asked for) about post birth bodies just shows how inflated her ego is.

I remember her going on about this before. I think it might have been before she had Rex (when I followed her and actually liked her 🙈) but I was beginning to dislike her because she was going on about this narrative online of mums bodies being ruined after childbirth and ‘that’s not always the case guys’🙄🙄. Then proceeds to show pics of her in a bikini saying ‘not all boobs and bodies are wrecked by pregnancy’. I remember thinking ‘I bleeping hate you’ 😂 a tad harsh, yes maybe. But no one needs that point hammered home via social media because for years it’s all we’ve ever seen with celebrities ‘bouncing back’ after having kids, and being celebrated for it. Yes some women’s bodies might not be wrecked but the majority of us will never be the same and the more that message is out there, the less tit women will feel. I’m sorry but a flat stomach a week after giving birth is not normal for 99% of mums so Susie sticking up for a fuckin SUPERMODEL, nah I’m sorry but you’ve lost me and hopefully thousands of others.

Just when you think she couldn’t possibly be any more unlikeable, she comes up trumps once again! 😂

Ps can you tell I’ve just had a strong coffee before writing this 🤪
Click to expand...
Notice everyone defending Em Rat against “body shaming” are the people who desperately want to share current or throw back pics of their great bounce back bodies. It’s so transparent it’s just an opportunity to brag rather than a feminist defending ALL bodies.
 
Lovestolurk said:
Notice everyone defending Em Rat against “body shaming” are the people who desperately want to share current or throw back pics of their great bounce back bodies. It’s so transparent it’s just an opportunity to brag rather than a feminist defending ALL bodies.
Click to expand...
You’re absolutely right. So many narcissistic people desperate to show off their half naked bods all in the name of ‘body positivity’ Aye, right 🙄 as we say in Scotland 😁😁
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top