Simon Harris #4 He lost 5 stone, and gained 457 thousand pounds

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
lilykestrel said:
View attachment 2635676 q

nope, crickets over in Manbehavingdadlyshire. Just humble bragging about his content getting recycled into a Xitter-watch write up in the local Mirror Group paper.
Click to expand...
Curious isn't it...?
---
Two things jump out of me from this shot - 1: the guy is doing his best to hurry along Prince Charles and get him away from the two of them, 2: They've both been at the trough haven't they - you know what I mean?

 
Last edited:
CookieZippy said:
Absolute drivel. The woman singing it is doing so in a manner someone would sing if they were entertaining two year olds. Which is fair as that is pretty much the mental level of it.


Click to expand...


there's another one with her on his YouTube that must have been done for the COVID group



whilst looking for that one, I stumbled across this



"No Simon Junior, it's not bath time, I'm filming a biting 15 minute long satire on building a wall across the channel to go with my satirical GoFundMe"
 
CookieZippy said:
bleeping hell. Surely nobody has watched all 15 minutes of that bath video? They can't have! I noticed as well that the Together for Suffolk page has been very active lately. I wonder if he's just been given another 100 grand or so for it?
Click to expand...

1702901917729.png


now that's a Harris graphic design masterpiece if ever there was one
 
CookieZippy said:
bleeping hell. Surely nobody has watched all 15 minutes of that bath video? They can't have! I noticed as well that the Together for Suffolk page has been very active lately. I wonder if he's just been given another 100 grand or so for it?
Click to expand...

1702906460589.png


Well Socialkind (the company that hasn't existed since July 22), just received their PO (from Nov 23 PO spreadsheet) for the next six months so best fire up MS Paint and crank out some graphics.

Whilst I'm not completely au fait with public sector procurement policy, I raise POs in my non-local authority public sector job on the daily. And it is odd to me that it's being raised for Socialkind rather than Social Kindness, but that could be a internal PO system quirk and a case of updating previous company details on the same supplier code - although that's odd, because it's technically a new/different supplier. (It's not a case of limited characters, there's much longer supplier names out there)
 
lilykestrel said:
View attachment 2637706 q

Well Socialkind (the company that hasn't existed since July 22), just received their PO (from Nov 23 PO spreadsheet) for the next six months so best fire up MS Paint and crank out some graphics.

Whilst I'm not completely au fait with public sector procurement policy, I raise POs in my non-local authority public sector job on the daily. And it is odd to me that it's being raised for Socialkind rather than Social Kindness, but that could be a internal PO system quirk and a case of updating previous company details on the same supplier code - although that's odd, because it's technically a new/different supplier. (It's not a case of limited characters, there's much longer supplier names out there)
Click to expand...

I'm guessing they would have sought that the contract just be novated accross. But it does raise issues that HMRC would be interested in - i.e. why close the old business when it was a going concern? The wider question is, why are councils falling for this?
 
Fred Santos said:
I'm guessing they would have sought that the contract just be novated accross. But it does raise issues that HMRC would be interested in - i.e. why close the old business when it was a going concern? The wider question is, why are councils falling for this?
Click to expand...

Might be a good one to send to Private Eye. They really do look into tips, especially around dodgy council stuff.
 
lilykestrel said:
It's like the Mirror Group, where you get the same article across all the "[insert county] Live" publications, but with Facebook statuses.


View attachment 2637847 q

View attachment 2637851 q




View attachment 2637849 q

View attachment 2637856 q
Click to expand...

Talk about money for old rope. This is a joke he’s made plenty of times before and now he’s charging the tax payers of Essex to publish it, then charging the tax payers of Sussex for doing a Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V onto their page. You almost have to admire how brazen the grift is.
 
Pkershaw said:
Talk about money for old rope. This is a joke he’s made plenty of times before and now he’s charging the tax payers of Essex to publish it, then charging the tax payers of Sussex for doing a Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V onto their page. You almost have to admire how brazen the grift is.
Click to expand...

I'll have you know, Pkershaw, that the people of Essex and Suffolk found it VERY HELPFUL last year

1702933943100.png
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top