I debated whether to bring this up, because it's very difficult for me to be objective when someone ends up being your personal bugbear, but it still seems insane to me how Anna pulls off these marathons and never gets injured when she does them back to back and goes back to running 24-48 hours afterwards, not at a gentle pace as she claims either. Surely when you run a marathon at 7:30, even if you insist it was easy, your
gentle pace still isn't in the 7:50s? I mean we have a marathon in 3:17, two days off, then a 4 mile run and a 10k, both in the 7:50s.
And it's hard not to read her odd obsession with festive running as needing to get back to it as soon as a possible to burn off all those Christmas calories. I just wish her body would finally have had enough of her exercise bulimia, because a long-term injury would force her to face the obvious issues excused by her friends and family and masked by a love for (read: obsession with) running. Her post today seems pre-emptively defensive.
View attachment 1825067 q
Part of this is bitterness because I run or spectate that race every year and this year I was on crutches, stuck in the house, despite being more sensible with training than she has ever been. It's just so difficult to separate truth from fiction with her. Like, the two ladies who finished ahead of her weren't *that* much faster and if the entire race was so easy for her, despite being her second fastest marathon, why not push yourself a bit and go for the win? It just makes no sense to me. She runs all her runs sub-8:00/mile pace now as well, even with the buggy. All her long runs were getting faster and faster. It doesn't really add up that this race was truly easy and not an intentional attempt to get close to her PB, but at the same time how on earth can she get back to running so quickly if it was a hard effort?