Prince Andrew #2 Airmiles Andy - Randy Andy - The Toxic Prince

1
Mark81 said:
Both can be bad people, one doesn't excuse the other.

Andrew hasn't done or said much so there isn't a lot to talk about.
Click to expand...

Are you equating using a trafficked girl, being best mates with a human trafficker and his GF with someone who had a public split from a family? :/

Andrew one thread, plus 5 pages. How many for Harry and how maybe posts are all over the forum?

The truth is people don't give a tit because the media hasn't told them to. Well, they have, but only half-hearted and so we get a halfhearted response in return.
 
Purrrrrrr said:
Are you equating using a trafficked girl, being best mates with a human trafficker and his GF with someone who had a public split from a family? :/

Andrew one thread, plus 5 pages. How many for Harry and how maybe posts are all over the forum?

The truth is people don't give a tit because the media hasn't told them to. Well, they have, but only half-hearted and so we get a halfhearted response in return.
Click to expand...

No, and that's my point. One doesn't excuse or equat to the other. Both can be bad behaviour in different ways.

There isn't a lot to say on Andrew now, if he kept writing books and giving interviews ot would probably be different. But Harry and meghan keep on talking, and with the inconsistencies and ridiculous revelations there is much to talk about...its a gossip forum after all. If Harry and meghan had just got on with their lives quietly we wouldn't be talking about them either.

There are also plenty of influencer threads with more comments on than this one, and that has nothing to do with the media, should they not be spoken about either because there are more serious issues out there?

Andrew is a serious issue with not much grey area and therefore not much to talk about. His accuser also stopped the trial and took the money and has been gagged. Both things that could have kept the conversation going. Once the gag order is lifted and she talks, maybe more revelations will come out. Although I suspect we know most of it now, the interesting stuff is the names that have not been mentioned yet.

The reason H&M won't got for Andrew is Eugenie is their one ally left in the family.
 
Mark81 said:
No, and that's my point. One doesn't excuse or equat to the other. Both can be bad behaviour in different ways.

There isn't a lot to say on Andrew now, if he kept writing books and giving interviews ot would probably be different. But Harry and meghan keep on talking, and with the inconsistencies and ridiculous revelations there is much to talk about...its a gossip forum after all. If Harry and meghan had just got on with their lives quietly we wouldn't be talking about them either.

There are also plenty of influencer threads with more comments on than this one, and that has nothing to do with the media, should they not be spoken about either because there are more serious issues out there?

Andrew is a serious issue with not much grey area and therefore not much to talk about. His accuser also stopped the trial and took the money and has been gagged. Both things that could have kept the conversation going. Once the gag order is lifted and she talks, maybe more revelations will come out. Although I suspect we know most of it now, the interesting stuff is the names that have not been mentioned yet.

The reason H&M won't got for Andrew is Eugenie is their one ally left in the family.
Click to expand...


Apart from the fact that he's a dirty self entitled rapist who was best mates with a sex trafficker of underage girls.
 
Phil Anne Throw Pee said:
Apart from the fact that he's a dirty self entitled rapist who was best mates with a sex trafficker of underage girls.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree, but that's not new, it's already been said by many...so how does the conversion continue. The only option is to just keep saying the same thing over and over, until there is something new in the story
 
Mark81 said:
I don't disagree, but that's not new, it's already been said by many...so how does the conversion continue. The only option is to just keep saying the same thing over and over, until there is something new in the story
Click to expand...


The conversation needs to continue until he is in prison where he belongs. It might be 'saying the same thing over and over' but he needs to be held accountable and the only way for that to happen is for his actions and behaviours never to be forgotten.
 
Phil Anne Throw Pee said:
The conversation needs to continue until he is in prison where he belongs. It might be 'saying the same thing over and over' but he needs to be held accountable and the only way for that to happen is for his actions and behaviours never to be forgotten.
Click to expand...
A public outcry isn't going to lead to him being imprisoned. That's not how the law works. As disgusting as he is, she was over the age of consent and he'll claim that he didn't know she was trafficked. I don't think they have enough to charge him with anything. He's the only public figure that's been tainted by the Epstein scandal. If anything should be in the media more, it's the rest of them that are still getting away with it. His actions aren't forgotten just because they're not in the papers every day - it's just that the papers can't print the same story over and over with no new information. Who'd read it?
 
I am pretty sure that Charles has encouraged him to stay hidden from view and not say anything. I wonder if the pay off is he can do stuff like walk to church with them but no official stuff? So he is accepted as a family member but not a working royal dealing with the public.
 
Em_gardener said:
A public outcry isn't going to lead to him being imprisoned. That's not how the law works. As disgusting as he is, she was over the age of consent and he'll claim that he didn't know she was trafficked. I don't think they have enough to charge him with anything. He's the only public figure that's been tainted by the Epstein scandal. If anything should be in the media more, it's the rest of them that are still getting away with it. His actions aren't forgotten just because they're not in the papers every day - it's just that the papers can't print the same story over and over with no new information. Who'd read it?
Click to expand...

But they do with Harry, many times it's the same thing written in a different way. many times it's just some made-up old tit but because people still buy it and don't care about it. they carry on. Harry is public enemy No1 and the media make sure he stays there.

Do you really believe Andrew just sits at some sucking his thumb, No he still carries on his private life as he always did except the media don't tell us his every move,

This is why there was no outcry when he walked to the church because the Queen already before that spat in everyone's eye when she let him escort her to Philips memorial, all the people she could have chosen out of her children and grandchildren etc she chose him. The media could have created the biggest outcry then but it did.

If the media wanted Andrerw more hated then Harry , then that is what would happen. Every single move he made would be reported on. tristed and written in a way to wind the public up.
 
Purrrrrrr said:
But they do with Harry, many times it's the same thing written in a different way. many times it's just some made-up old tit but because people still buy it and don't care about it. they carry on. Harry is public enemy No1 and the media make sure he stays there.

Do you really believe Andrew just sits at some sucking his thumb, No he still carries on his private life as he always did except the media don't tell us his every move,

This is why there was no outcry when he walked to the church because the Queen already before that spat in everyone's eye when she let him escort her to Philips memorial, all the people she could have chosen out of her children and grandchildren etc she chose him. The media could have created the biggest outcry then but it did.

If the media wanted Andrerw more hated then Harry , then that is what would happen. Every single move he made would be reported on. tristed and written in a way to wind the public up.
Click to expand...
Harry is constantly providing new material for the media to work with. Of course they write about him. In his rare quiet periods there aren't loads of articles about him.
I actually don't think Andrew is doing anything majorly exciting. He lost all his trade envoy roles so he's not traveling and he lost his military roles as well. The DM have had a few articles about him going horse riding around Windsor but who wants to read about that. I don't know what he does in his private life - meet fergie, visit the grandchildren? - but I don't want to read about it unless it's actually interesting and I doubt it is at the moment.

To be honest it's the way that people bring up Andrew every time there's a new flurry of publicity about Harry that gets me. Reading articles about Harry having a quick ride in a field is on the same level as reading any other celeb gossip. It's for entertainment. The Andrew stuff I would consider a serious news story. The Epstein story isn't in the news as much as it was when it broke first so I wouldn't expect the press to still be writing regularly about Andrew either.
I'm genuinely interested to know what kind of article you want them to write about Andrew?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top