Musings30
VIP Member
Completely agree with you on each of your points. I'm interested to hear people's authentic, lived stories, and about their cultures, rather than the media and Hollywood etc disingenuously jumping on the equality bandwagon and pretending they care about diversity, when really they're just doing it for the brownie points. There's still a lot of shameless tokenism and diversity box-ticking in films and TV shows, including MiC...I can only imagine how frustrating it must be for people seeing this time and time again, and nothing really changing.I am a minority so I will say this, I understand the annoyance that people have about everything being political. And I don't personally require everything have someone like me represented in order to enjoy it. But I do have a problem with people in general thinking people of my race should almost exist outside of history. To have any representation at all even in fictional/fantasy/historical roles for people of my race seems to get not only a lot of white people irrate but also other races of people.
I do think it is lazy how Hollywood likes to racebend instead of giving creative of other races chances to tell unique stories. Thar would be a good example of true inclusivity having diversity in front and behind the camera.
With Made in Chelsea it is neither here nor there for me. But if they are going to have someone like Paris, at least give her an opportunity for storylines. It is all just surface. Same with Akin. He was just sort of there. Paris barely got a moment to talk about her dating struggles/racism and I don't get the impression that the other girls really interact with or care for her to include her in activities. I notice they don't really engage with her comments on social media like they do with everyone else. So for me, seeing this attempt at diversity just triggers life memories of being excluded the same way or just being treated like the scenery. You're just there so they have "proof" and people will stop the complaining.
As for the political, I think it is also the fact that when people are considered the standard and default in society they won't see things that are political as that. It is interesting to see things people say that are becoming too political not realizing that those things in part have always kind of been political. There is obviously a political and cultural meaning behind why certain groups and genders etc. are often portrayed to reinforce and justify all sorts of things.
But MIC is not the hill I would die on for all this. It is just messy reality TV and escapism. I feel a lot of people want to virtue signal and just say they want diversity of all kinds for internet points. It is the in thing to do.
You're absolutely right about Paris. I've found myself feeling bad for her and her complete lack of meaningful screentime. She seems to be used for "filler" scenes, to pad things out a bit, rather than being given any meaningful storylines. It's a huge shame as she's got a lot to offer and has way more integrity, self-respect and personality than most of the other cast members combined. I'm so sorry to hear about your personal experiences, and I 100% agree that her presence on the show feels very tokenistic. I also liked Akin back in the old series. He was an interesting bloke (and put his friends' asshole behaviour to shame), but like you say, he was completely under-utilised and more of a "sidekick" cast member.
To address your point about things being "politicised", I may have been using the wrong term there, and completely get where you're coming from. What I was more getting at was that, representation is of course so important, but I don't think Made in Chelsea and what it's become (i.e.very badly-acted tosh filled with vacuous fame-seekers) is the right show for engaging with this debate over. Like you say, it feels like the producers have only ever brought on people of colour as lip service, which is massively disappointing.