Lucy Letby Case #74

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
O'lee said:
Afternoon fellas, happy Thirlwall Eve- our friend Richard is being as charming as ever.....
---

This sort of BS is causing witnesses from the Letby trial to be attacked in the street. These nutters need locking up
Click to expand...
These guys 🤣 so going to the trial puts you at a disadvantage to understanding the case 🤣 but then these people think not seeing the evidence also makes you better able to analyse and report on it so 🤪
 
O'lee said:
Afternoon fellas, happy Thirlwall Eve- our friend Richard is being as charming as ever.....
---

This sort of BS is causing witnesses from the Letby trial to be attacked in the street. These nutters need locking up
Click to expand...

hi Richard, I’m wondering if there is any statistical correlation between attending the trial as a member of the jury, and finding her guilty.

You misogynistic prick.
 
MmmB777 said:
These guys 🤣 so going to the trial puts you at a disadvantage to understanding the case 🤣 but then these people think not seeing the evidence also makes you better able to analyse and report on it so 🤪
Click to expand...
I was about to say those too. How stupid do you genuinely have to be to think that attending in person to hear all the evidence doesn’t give you an advantage to understand the case but relying on misinformed, cherry picked information allows you to have a much better understanding??? Huh???? These people are genuinely not ok. It’s embarrassing
 
Apostate said:
Richard Gill's latest is questioning why Letby's notes weren't covered by patient-therapist confidentiality
Click to expand...
Richard may want to have a listen to this from Court Room 2 Crime Scene, where Lucy herself explained why she wrote the notes. Spoiler alert, she doesn't say that she advised to write them by a third party at all. Surely Richard is not suggesting she lied on the stand, or during her police interviews? Not poor innocent Lucy.

Lucy Letby’s REAL Reason for Writing Alleged Confession Notes (youtube.com)
 
O'lee said:
Afternoon fellas, happy Thirlwall Eve- our friend Richard is being as charming as ever.....
---

This sort of BS is causing witnesses from the Letby trial to be attacked in the street. These nutters need locking up
Click to expand...

IJfc it's as if TEMU did Orwell.

Evidence is propaganda
Information is brainwashing
Injustice is Lucy LockedUp

The Stans told you to ignore the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their only strategy.
---
Orange lilly said:
Also there was Shaun and the daddy gate carry on.🤢 . They're both a pair of charlatans.
Click to expand...
Oh god I'd blotted Daddy Gate out. What he must hav got up to in the party scene he was the major drug dealer for doesn't bear thinking about.

So now he's sat there in his poor imitation of Joe Rogan's studio, making bank off telling a load of bereaved and traumatised parents that their kids were killed by a Masonic devil worshipping cult. Not that nicey-nice innocent English rose Lucy. Who only ever wanted to save them babies - and they done her down.
Though he never actually mentions the parents at all. None of them do. It's as if the parents and the tiny victims are peripheral characters in Princess Lucy's tragedy tale.

I know who I'd like to meet in the street.
 
Last edited:
Tofino said:
www.bbc.co.uk

Lucy Letby victims' families upset at 'innocence' claims

A solicitor says families of babies murdered by Lucy Letby are distressed by claims she is innocent.
www.bbc.co.uk

I’ve not seen it but the solicitor of six of the families has spoken on bbc breakfast and radio 4 this morning.
Click to expand...

Yes I heard this. They played the clip of statistics lady Jane talking about 'from what I've seen, I'm concerned' which had me eyerolling hard. Like unless you've seen everything relevant there is to see, maybe shut the duck up?

Then they interviewed the solicitor. Started with them saying Jane had volunteered to give evidence at the inquiry and would the families welcome that? Response: No. That would be completely inappropriate. This is about the hospital, not about the criminal trial, which has concluded.

She also went on to say that the speculation was really offensive and hurtful to the families. (I paraphrase all this, apart from the 'No', which made me snort.)
 
The pro Letby halfwits are ramping it up aren't they? I think it's because there are more people now out and defending the verdicts, the non guilty morons have had their day. Look at this vile tweet from that most disgusting of simps, I just can't fathom how any reasonable, sane and empathetic person could even think this let alone put it on socials. It's such a horrible thing to say, that man is warped and twisted.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240909_151307_X.jpg
    Screenshot_20240909_151307_X.jpg
    82.3 KB · Views: 17
AllieBee said:
The pro Letby halfwits are ramping it up aren't they? I think it's because there are more people now out and defending the verdicts, the non guilty morons have had their day. Look at this vile tweet from that most disgusting of simps, I just can't fathom how any reasonable, sane and empathetic person could even think this let alone put it on socials. It's such a horrible thing to say, that man is warped and twisted.
Click to expand...

The inquiry starts tomorrow and they didn’t get what they wanted, for it to be postponed or to at least include a re-look at the criminal evidence .

From tomorrow the media will be focussed on what comes out from the inquiry. Which will still be critical of the hospital but under the lens of Letby killed or harmed those babies, and what did the hospital do (or not do) to try and stop her.
 
Tofino said:
The inquiry starts tomorrow and they didn’t get what they wanted, for it to be postponed or to at least include a re-look at the criminal evidence .

From tomorrow the media will be focussed on what comes out from the inquiry. Which will still be critical of the hospital but under the lens of Letby killed or harmed those babies, and what did the hospital do (or not do) to try and stop her.
Click to expand...
Imagine what they will be like if she ever gets to the criminal case review panel! I think that none of them realise just how stupid they are.
 
dfsdfsdfadfs said:
Can anyone give me a short breakdown of why there seems to be a lot of pro Lucy Letby posts and articles lately? People keep talking now like there is a lot of doubt and as if she's been locked up unfairly. Is this just nonsense or did something come out that made people question things?
Click to expand...

I was just listening to the murder sheet podcast and they discussed that from a journalist perspective, it’s just more interesting. It’s more interesting and sort of entertainment to question is this a miscarriage of a justice. Especially so soon after the post office and andrew malkinson cases.

There was an article in the New Yorker that a lot of doubters refer to however it’s littered with misconstrued evidence and leaves out other important evidence. But people have clung on to it.

There was also (quite rightly) media restrictions until the conclusion of the retrial which is only two months ago so none of these views could be reported in the UK until then so I think it’s why there seems to be so many at once.

The public inquiry starts tomorrow so it’s also topical, especially since some people have been trying to get it postponed or the terms of reference changed.

You have some ‘experts’ weighing in but even they have had to admit they haven’t even read full court documents or followed the trial. Even those that have, haven’t had access to the thousands of pages of medical records.

You then get the people who just lack any trust in the ‘establishment’ and think this is some huge conspiracy against a young, ‘pretty’, blonde, white nurse by nhs management, police, the justice system.

Add ALL of that to social media and it’s like a perfect storm. If I put aside my anger I’m actually quite fascinated in the psychology behind it all.
 
Tofino said:
I was just listening to the murder sheet podcast and they discussed that from a journalist perspective, it’s just more interesting. It’s more interesting and sort of entertainment to question is this a miscarriage of a justice. Especially so soon after the post office and andrew malkinson cases.

There was an article in the New Yorker that a lot of doubters refer to however it’s littered with misconstrued evidence and leaves out other important evidence. But people have clung on to it.

There was also (quite rightly) media restrictions until the conclusion of the retrial which is only two months ago so none of these views could be reported in the UK until then so I think it’s why there seems to be so many at once.

The public inquiry starts tomorrow so it’s also topical, especially since some people have been trying to get it postponed or the terms of reference changed.

You have some ‘experts’ weighing in but even they have had to admit they haven’t even read full court documents or followed the trial. Even those that have, haven’t had access to the thousands of pages of medical records.

You then get the people who just lack any trust in the ‘establishment’ and think this is some huge conspiracy against a young, ‘pretty’, blonde, white nurse by nhs management, police, the justice system.

Add ALL of that to social media and it’s like a perfect storm. If I put aside my anger I’m actually quite fascinated in the psychology behind it all.
Click to expand...
And even the 'experts' aren't convinced enough to actually put their names to anything, most of them prefer to remain anonymous. Wonder why!
 
Apostate said:
I've defended the operation of the unit but if this is true it's very poor.
Click to expand...

Yeah this was exactly the sort of stuff I mentioned when I said the unit was poor. Was it worse because of Letby? Unquestionably but my opinion remains it sounds generally poor around a lot of other aspects.

ETA: I’m pretty sure I’ve heard before that the first some parents heard of their children’s collapses was when they were contacted by the police which seems to be what this is saying too. So it really does make me think the attitude, as stated re:insulin overdoses was “they’re fine now, no need to investigate anything!” which is poor practise for a multitude of reasons set aside from them identifying a serial killer.
 
I think certain people have a thirst for a miscarriage of justice story since the post office scandal and will cling onto anything. I think Gill wants to be relive past glories and decided that he was going to protest her Innocence before the trial had even started. I have noticed that many of her supports also seem to be anti establishment and anti vaxxers.
 
Last edited:
Hazara04 said:
I think certain people have a thirst for a miscarriage of justice story since the post office scandal and will cling onto anything. I think Gill wants to be relive past glories and decided that he was going to protest her Innocence before the trial had even started. I have noticed that many of her supports also seem to be anti establishment and anti vaxxers.
Click to expand...
Exactly this!
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top