Louise Pentland #24 The principles of the NSPCC don’t apply to ✨ me ✨

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Anyone who has had an experience with trying to bring an historical abuse case to the police & CPS will know why she might have hesitated to do so, the specific dates and times and bruises and cuts that she’d have to prove as a 40 year old woman?
Not so much the police, I'd simply ruin her life and ensure EVERYONE knew about it, including her high brow business buddies....but yano thats just me :ROFLMAO:
 
Can’t stand her! Can we request a thread for her? Her insta is like watching a car crash. I also can’t with her playing up her depression for shits and giggles.
Her personality has basically become “I smoke and take photos in my underwear”

Back to Louise - I wonder if she’ll see any of the stuff about Shari Franke’s new book and feel any level of self awareness. I mean obviously not but one can hope.
---
What on earth is this supposed to mean 😭😭😭


View attachment 3227352 q
She did a video about this once I think about how she has a whole imaginary world in her head with a lot of deep lore. Maladaptive daydreaming I suppose, which I don’t blame her for given her past!
 
This is my first post on here so please say if anything not allowed. But I saw and spoke to Louise and Darcy at MusicalCon. Louise was nice enough but when we saw her just on her own she was just sat on a chair looking board to tears and literally looked like she was asleep at some point and when she wasn’t doing that she was just on her phone. Bit rude when there’s a live performance right there in front of you. I also saw them leaving after only like 3 hours which obviously doesn’t matter but they had VIP tickets which is £195 each. That’s a lot for only a few hours. My friend’s daughter wanted a picture but would only allow her to be in it and not with Darcy so that’s interesting?
 

Attachments

  • 4216ef02-d699-4b85-9a51-9d247ac8c068.jpeg
    4216ef02-d699-4b85-9a51-9d247ac8c068.jpeg
    25.5 KB · Views: 8
  • 256d5c12-0672-4681-b871-50a6a200892b.jpeg
    256d5c12-0672-4681-b871-50a6a200892b.jpeg
    55.3 KB · Views: 5
  • IMG_0973.mov
    24.8 MB
I’ve not seen anything from Louise in ages . But her daughters Instagram popped up on my feed. I was shocked she has gone down that route .

I’m of the opinion kids should be kids for as long as possible . It’s such a short time of your life . Yet here’s a kid going on about day in her life , which has been clearly coached and make up etc.

cynical side of me thinks , is that in the hope some kiddy ‘make up ‘ company get her to front it.

It’s interesting she is using Louise’s surname , and not her fathers , is that because Louise is worried people will think ‘who’s this Darcy child?!’ If her name isn’t attached.
I wonder what he makes of all this . Pushing her out on social media.
 
I’ve not seen anything from Louise in ages . But her daughters Instagram popped up on my feed. I was shocked she has gone down that route .

I’m of the opinion kids should be kids for as long as possible . It’s such a short time of your life . Yet here’s a kid going on about day in her life , which has been clearly coached and make up etc.

cynical side of me thinks , is that in the hope some kiddy ‘make up ‘ company get her to front it.

It’s interesting she is using Louise’s surname , and not her fathers , is that because Louise is worried people will think ‘who’s this Darcy child?!’ If her name isn’t attached.
I wonder what he makes of all this . Pushing her out on social media.

I’m so sure that ‘Pentland’ is her ‘stage name’ if she was ever to do acting? I could be wrong but we also don’t know if there’s been a falling out with her dad.
 
Where did they confirm this?

Funny that it’s only been confirmed since they got a formal complaint a couple of weeks ago!

I emailed them a few weeks ago to ask for their stance on children of influencers being encouraged into having public profiles, and asked them to justify that against their ambassador doing it. I believe another poster did something similar around the same time, and posted here about it

Their response came through this week and said:

Thank you so much for your question and feedback.

Louise Pentland was an NSPCC ambassador for over 3 years, but this relationship ended over a year ago. We are grateful to Louise for her support during her time working alongside the NSPCC. I’m sorry the information on our website was not up to date to reflect that Louise was no longer an ambassador. We have now updated this.

Any relationships with ambassadors are carefully considered and assessed against a set of organisational due diligence criteria. Louise has spoken openly of her lived experience of abuse when she was a child. Her personal experience of our cause and her profile as a parenting blogger gave us the opportunity to reach and connect with parenting communities to work towards our vision of ending child abuse and neglect together.

When we first on-boarded Louise as an ambassador, we didn’t see social media activity featuring her children. When posts featuring her children emerged, a review did not highlight anything concerning and the relationship continued with no further action taken.

We believe that the online world is an integral part of children’s lives, which we would want children to be able to enjoy and participate in without being put at risk of harm. With that in mind, we would always advise that it is important to follow the terms of service, and the recommended age settings for any social media platforms. Furthermore, we continue to campaign for the online world to be designed with children’s safety in mind and for technology companies to be held accountable for putting children first and taking action to deal with avoidable harm taking place online. Importantly, we are working with children and young people to understand what they need from online platforms and services and working to share these insights with the technology sector. And finally, we are continuing to educate children and young people, provide awareness raising sessions for parents and carers and training for professionals on the risks and benefits of the online world.

As I mentioned earlier, Louise’s relationship as an ambassador has now come to an end. If we were to onboard Louise again in the future, we would restart the due diligence process, and any concerns (including your points) would be reviewed as part of this process.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top