Louise Pentland #24 The principles of the NSPCC don’t apply to ✨ me ✨

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I'm not a fan of family vloggers/creators who use their children as content in general but Louise is particularly egregious to me and here's why - she is a (former) nspcc ambassador engaged to a senior police officer.
I know this has already been discussed multiple times but I don't think it's acknowledged enough, or at all, outside of here how insane that actually is.
Other creators maybe be at least somewhat ignorant to what happens and what can happen to the images of their children and the risk they are putting their children in. Not to excuse them as its been talked about enough and I'm sure these people are aware but still, there is a plausible deniability, rightly or wrongly. A sense of 'well I haven't seen it so it doesn't effect me' mindset.

HOWEVER, Liam has 100% seen what happens to children's images online. He KNOWS AND HAS SEEN THE DISGUSTING THINGS HAPPENING TO CHILDREN ONLINE. And he still willingly let's Louise put his daughter and step daughter out there. He is NOT a good egg. I won't accuse him of anything, but I wouldn't trust his intentions.
Louise too, will have been told these things. She knows. And yet doesn't care at all.

They are HORRIBLE people and I hate seeing things online about how Louise is the best from the old brit crew and how she's stayed the most normal and down to earth. She is vile.

Rant over 😂
 
Jenbean1992 said:
I'm not a fan of family vloggers/creators who use their children as content in general but Louise is particularly egregious to me and here's why - she is a (former) nspcc ambassador engaged to a senior police officer.
I know this has already been discussed multiple times but I don't think it's acknowledged enough, or at all, outside of here how insane that actually is.
Other creators maybe be at least somewhat ignorant to what happens and what can happen to the images of their children and the risk they are putting their children in. Not to excuse them as its been talked about enough and I'm sure these people are aware but still, there is a plausible deniability, rightly or wrongly. A sense of 'well I haven't seen it so it doesn't effect me' mindset.

HOWEVER, Liam has 100% seen what happens to children's images online. He KNOWS AND HAS SEEN THE DISGUSTING THINGS HAPPENING TO CHILDREN ONLINE. And he still willingly let's Louise put his daughter and step daughter out there. He is NOT a good egg. I won't accuse him of anything, but I wouldn't trust his intentions.
Louise too, will have been told these things. She knows. And yet doesn't care at all.

They are HORRIBLE people and I hate seeing things online about how Louise is the best from the old brit crew and how she's stayed the most normal and down to earth. She is vile.

Rant over 😂
Click to expand...
Her stepdad is a police officer and her dad's a teacher who would have done safeguarding training and most likely childcare courses where you hear about all kinds of abuse all kinds of cases etc
 
Smudger said:
She’s not having her professional Christmas decorations this year due to costs? Has she tried budgeting and ✨manifesting✨?
Click to expand...

damn! an epic fail at budgeting skills this year Louise! I thought she said that ANYONE can spend £3k on Christmas decorations if they account for it in their budget at the beginning of the year?! and as you say, if - for whatever reason - she messed up with her budget, why isn't she simply ✨manifesting✨ the decorations she wants into reality? quite frankly, if that has worked, it simply means she doesn't want them badly enough.



although tbh, with her recent begging in an attempt to blag herself invites to PR events in London, it wouldn't surprise me if she is mentioning her inability to afford professional decorations this year in the hope a company feels sorry for her and offers her a freebie, in exchange for her promoting them - which she will then claim. happened as a result of manifestation. 🙄



it will actually be a nice opportunity for D&P to be allowed to get involved in decorating the tree etc - although I imagine Louise will be very controlling. they certainly won't be allowed to decorate the main tree - or it will be. amummy/Darcy event while P is in bed - and any decorations Pearl IS allow to hang on an additional tree that is displayed somewhere in the background will be hastily rearranged by Louise the moment Pearl has finished, as her efforts simply will not be good enough. it's not about having a NG. fun. together as a family and makin memories - it's about creating aesthetic instaworthy content. plus even without her £3K budget, it's not like she'll be popping out to B&M to stock up on. tinsel, baubles and decorations - it will all be fancy expensive top-of-the-range brands, like John Lewis, Selfridges, Harrods, Fortnum & Mason, Vondels etc - TOTALLY relatable. and guaranteed that Lady Louise will blag herself a whole load of gifted decorations from brands who take pity on her with all her financial woes. after all, Queen Camilla is her BFF. she is basically royalty so it's no less than she deserves. 🙄🙄
 
Is this true? 👀
IMG_2515.jpeg
 
AliceInWanderLost said:
damn! an epic fail at budgeting skills this year Louise! I thought she said that ANYONE can spend £3k on Christmas decorations if they account for it in their budget at the beginning of the year?! and as you say, if - for whatever reason - she messed up with her budget, why isn't she simply ✨manifesting✨ the decorations she wants into reality? quite frankly, if that has worked, it simply means she doesn't want them badly enough.



although tbh, with her recent begging in an attempt to blag herself invites to PR events in London, it wouldn't surprise me if she is mentioning her inability to afford professional decorations this year in the hope a company feels sorry for her and offers her a freebie, in exchange for her promoting them - which she will then claim. happened as a result of manifestation. 🙄



it will actually be a nice opportunity for D&P to be allowed to get involved in decorating the tree etc - although I imagine Louise will be very controlling. they certainly won't be allowed to decorate the main tree - or it will be. amummy/Darcy event while P is in bed - and any decorations Pearl IS allow to hang on an additional tree that is displayed somewhere in the background will be hastily rearranged by Louise the moment Pearl has finished, as her efforts simply will not be good enough. it's not about having a NG. fun. together as a family and makin memories - it's about creating aesthetic instaworthy content. plus even without her £3K budget, it's not like she'll be popping out to B&M to stock up on. tinsel, baubles and decorations - it will all be fancy expensive top-of-the-range brands, like John Lewis, Selfridges, Harrods, Fortnum & Mason, Vondels etc - TOTALLY relatable. and guaranteed that Lady Louise will blag herself a whole load of gifted decorations from brands who take pity on her with all her financial woes. after all, Queen Camilla is her BFF. she is basically royalty so it's no less than she deserves. 🙄🙄
Click to expand...
I would take a tree five baubles on one branch over a asthetically pleasing tree anyday. My kids love decorating the tree and it's theirs as much as ours so we let them go mad and yeah it doesn't look amazing but who cares
 
Does anyone else remember back in the day Louise doing a post that her Dad first used the Xmas decorators in his own home, and then paid for Louise to have her’s done every year. Parents are allowed to “gift” their children £3,000 a year that falls out of IHT, and as Xmas decorations only qualify for tax relief & VAT if in an office and not WFH this would make sense. Could the real reason she is not having the decorators in be some sort of disagreement about the wedding costs which will no doubt be falling heavily on Louise’s Dad. She did a post recently to say the wedding honeymoon not happening as her family did not want to look after the grandchildren?!
 
Pafosluver said:
Does anyone else remember back in the day Louise doing a post that her Dad first used the Xmas decorators in his own home, and then paid for Louise to have her’s done every year. Parents are allowed to “gift” their children £3,000 a year that falls out of IHT, and as Xmas decorations only qualify for tax relief & VAT if in an office and not WFH this would make sense. Could the real reason she is not having the decorators in be some sort of disagreement about the wedding costs which will no doubt be falling heavily on Louise’s Dad. She did a post recently to say the wedding honeymoon not happening as her family did not want to look after the grandchildren?!
Click to expand...
Why should she expect her father to pay for the second wedding ?
A London hotel and a column on Hello , I’m sure there will be some sponsorship
 
Fingers in many pies as they say! Director of 13+ active companies, he specialises in technology & digital platforms. A real guru, hugely respected in his field with over 40 yrs specialising in producing worldwide sales promotional films, virtual reality, interactive systems software applications heavily experienced in the USA resort travel sector. Also owns village pubs, property portfolio, local councillor etc.
 
I hope her dad doesn't pay for her wedding. Imagine being a successful business man and knowing that if potential clients look you you there is a very high chance of them coming across your daughter slagging you off- despite your best efforts to reconcile. Yes, what happened to Louise was terrible but she admitted herself that her dad divorced the step mother as soon as he found out what had happened. She will forever hold a grudge because he didn't realise sooner what was happening and wasn't around enough to protect her. But what is he supposed to do now? She's going to be forever angry at him for not being able to go back in time and I he expect has continually tried to buy her love, only for her to continue to bash him publicly.
I would cut contact if I was him. She's going to play the victim forever regardless, so may as well bring yourself some peace.

I wonder if he's fearful that if he does put his foot down then she will REALLY hang him out to dry online, whether truthful or not
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top