Louise Pentland #23 Sprinkle of Bitter, content just gets sh...

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
surreyeye said:
Dubai will be not a goto destination due to the issues in the Middle East
Click to expand...
The Foreign Office has NOT issued any advice not to travel to any of the UAE countries and are not expected to unless things escalate. It is classed as “risk” same as Egypt, Turkey etc. Flights and accommodation are continuing to be in very high demand. The same applies to Cyprus right next to the Syrian/Israel border, its business as usual even though the American military have helicopters flying over the island every night!!
 
Pafosluver said:
The Foreign Office has NOT issued any advice not to travel to any of the UAE countries and are not expected to unless things escalate. It is classed as “risk” same as Egypt, Turkey etc. Flights and accommodation are continuing to be in very high demand. The same applies to Cyprus right next to the Syrian/Israel border, its business as usual even though the American military have helicopters flying over the island every night!!
Click to expand...
But they have issued advice that things can change quickly and to remain vigilant , also the flight paths are at risk due to the area the missles are currently being fired . Hopefully nothing more will occur but it’s an unknown situation at present
 
surreyeye said:
But they have issued advice that things can change quickly and to remain vigilant , also the flight paths are at risk due to the area the missles are currently being fired . Hopefully nothing more will occur but it’s an unknown situation at present
Click to expand...
What the Foreign Office says goes. If one has a holiday/flight booked to say Dubai, Cyprus even UK or USA etc and the jitters set in that you no longer wanted to go as you felt it wasn’t safe, that’s too bad, no tour operator, airline, hotel, travel insurance will refund you unless the Foreign Office have declared it not safe to travel. Doesn’t seem to be putting travellers off, bookings are really high for 1/2 term and Christmas/New Year.
 
Oof, that "she*, not 'it'" response has REALLY rubbed me up the wrong way. Why is it that influencers start picking up on grammar and spelling issues when they have nothing useful or constructive to respond with in an argument? And the funny thing is, 'it' was perfectly acceptable in that context, if we imagine the OP was intending to say 'it's not my child that we are talking about' (which she was!).
 
myra1409 said:
Oof, that "she*, not 'it'" response has REALLY rubbed me up the wrong way. Why is it that influencers start picking up on grammar and spelling issues when they have nothing useful or constructive to respond with in an argument? And the funny thing is, 'it' was perfectly acceptable in that context, if we imagine the OP was intending to say 'it's not my child that we are talking about' (which she was!).
Click to expand...
She actually got the correction wrong. Should have been *her*
 
Smca53 said:
Wouldn’t it be a shame if someone complained to the NSPCC about her grim, dangerous and money-oriented behaviour and them using her as an ambassador

Anyway, in unrelated news 👀, I predict that we’ll know the NSPCC’s stance in 15 working days
Click to expand...

I am glad someone has done this. It’s completely hypocritical for her to be a NSPCC ambassador!
 
Violet07 said:
I see she doesn't have NSPCC ambassador in her bio on insta, I wonder if they've already parted ways👀
Click to expand...
She’s still listed as an ambassador on their website. So are Jim and Sarah so it’s clearly a meaningless title.

Edited to add: I’m not saying it’s right she should be able to use the NSPCC brand to make herself look better when she’s clearly rubbish at safeguarding her own daughter, just going by some of their ambassadors, they have clearly only been chosen based on their following and not on their commitment to protecting children.
 
Isn't she mates with the owners? Imagine seeing that? All comes back to money stupid cow.

Screenshot_20241006_102001_Instagram.jpg
 
I have a theory that Matt is completely offline now in order to give Darcy a safe space she can go to, whether she knows that yet or not
---
Not Louise related but family vlogger related:

In California, they're passing a law where "a percentage of earnings from content featuring minors will be placed in a protected trust that is accessible only when the child reaches adulthood. The legislation also mandates that records of income and the amount of time children appear in online content must be maintained."

Will be interesting to see which California based families suddenly decide to move out of state 👀
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top