Louise Pentland #23 Sprinkle of Bitter, content just gets sh...

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
She took Darcy off the internet during the Baby Glitter years. Made a massive fuss about it and it lasted about 6 weeks - when she was about 2.
She noticed she was losing £££ and engagement, so soon put her back online.

It was around the time that Sam (can’t remember her online name but was British with a semi US accent and lived in a double wide trailer with her hick husband and made videos from her closet) got stressed about how her kids had ended up on some other sites following her daily vlogging.

No way will this last.
 
Stegosauria said:
I think we’re giving Louise too much credit, she probably just thought Pearl didn’t look good.
Click to expand...
I thought so too, as I have no trust in Louise suddenly coming into her senses about the children's privacy. Then again, if the girls don't look the way Louise wants them, she'd take more pictures until she's pleased. So I'm curious, why'd she hide her face if it's not for privacy or looks :unsure:
 
I mean.. if it’s for privacy it’s a tad too late after you’ve shared where she dances, the play centre you frequently go to etc, every ounce of her life this far including her birth.

I suspect it’s more to do with how she looked in that particular picture. Drama Queen Pentland would have to film some ultra dramatic video, being passive aggressive/overly emotional/finding a way to relate it to her childhood, to explain why she’s stopping showing her. She’s never done anything with dignity
 
Pinkpen said:
I reckon she did the performative “can mummy post this picture of you?” And Pearl said no so Louise thinks the solution is just to put an emoji over the face and still post it 😵‍💫 which makes her a super great safeguarding expert parent obvs 🙄
Click to expand...
100% this. Next week we’ll have a story about how she always asks if her kids want to be posted and last week P said she didn’t want her face shown. She’s getting grief over D so this is a way of calming the waters and then she can do the whole D is of an age where she WANTS to be online, that’s her decision etc whereas with P I am always asking her if she wants to be online. Win win all round for her, she gets to look like the virtuous mother of the year, promote D Instagram and state that it’s D’s decision to be online and lastly she can then deflect and deflate the chatter about her posting her kids and her nspcc role by saying that P has her choice to be offline respected.
 
??? is something wrong with her insta or has she blocked me? 😂
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0139.png
    IMG_0139.png
    24.5 KB · Views: 17
yikez101 said:
I thought surely it can’t be that bad so I went and looked at her story… genuinely the worst ring I’ve ever seen View attachment 3212207 q
Click to expand...
I was on the fence about her ring, I thought she has large hands, nothing to do with weight, she's just a tall large woman, and perhaps the ring Liam bought looked lost on her finger, she kept the sentimental core he made and just wanted to make it more proportionate so that it didn't look 'silly' and invisible. However that redesigned ring is fugly! she could have made it so much prettier/classier! It looks cheap as hell, but I guess it's her ring, she's the one that has to look at it so maybe I'm back to you do you Louise.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top