Katie Price #418 Who is the owner of the secret 💩? Will it be revealed before she does bird?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
If this all about the 💩 pic and
A source close to the celebrity said: “She was absolutely mortified to see these pictures shared and took swift action.It is a terrible thing to do to someone and is a desecration of their right to privacy.”

Skank is selling nudes on OFs so how can she be mortified of this if she is happily flogging intimate videos pics for a quid to strangers
 
HistrionicSites said:
You need to look at the exemptions too.

Sexual Offences Act 2003

An Act to make new provision about sexual offences, their prevention and the protection of children from harm from other sexual acts, and for connected purposes.
www.legislation.gov.uk www.legislation.gov.uk
Click to expand...

This is the only one which seems relevant to me;

'(c)B was, or A reasonably believes that B was, in the intimate state voluntarily.''

But I don't really understand how it can apply as in the Stephen Bear case, the woman was in an intimate state voluntarily.
---
Chrisxo said:
I’ve not saw the pic same as the James Charles leak I put it into X and get WEIRD p-rn tweets coming up?!🫣😂
Click to expand...

Yess, it's just full of porn now, trying to get clicks on the back of it!
 
Ooh just reposted this ..slight dig I wonder at skank
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240814_211400_Instagram.jpg
    Screenshot_20240814_211400_Instagram.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 11
Helena-botham-farter said:
This is the only one which seems relevant to me;

'(c)B was, or A reasonably believes that B was, in the intimate state voluntarily.''

But I don't really understand how it can apply as in the Stephen Bear case, the woman was in an intimate state voluntarily.
---


Yess, it's just full of porn now, trying to get clicks on the back of it!
Click to expand...
It’s S66C(3)
A person (A) who shares a photograph or film which shows, or appears to show, another person (B) in an intimate state does not commit an offence under section 66B(1), (2) or (3) if—

(a)the photograph or film had, or A reasonably believes that the photograph or film had, been previously publicly shared, and

(b)B had, or A reasonably believes that B had, consented to the previous sharing.
 
Helena-botham-farter said:
This is the only one which seems relevant to me;

'(c)B was, or A reasonably believes that B was, in the intimate state voluntarily.''

But I don't really understand how it can apply as in the Stephen Bear case, the woman was in an intimate state voluntarily.
---


Yess, it's just full of porn now, trying to get clicks on the back of it!
Click to expand...
In the Stephen Bear case, she didn’t know she was being filmed. When she found out he had used the cctv to record it, she begged him to delete it but he shared it for money on his of.
 
NotTheDoctor26 said:
In the Stephen Bear case, she didn’t know she was being filmed. When she found out he had used the cctv to record it, she begged him to delete it but he shared it for money on his of.
Click to expand...
So, in that case, there was no consent. The poo case, in my opinion, is totally different and cannot be compared. Besides, the law changed on 31 January this year, clarifying certain areas and inserting exemptions.
 
HistrionicSites said:
It’s S66C(3)
A person (A) who shares a photograph or film which shows, or appears to show, another person (B) in an intimate state does not commit an offence under section 66B(1), (2) or (3) if—

(a)the photograph or film had, or A reasonably believes that the photograph or film had, been previously publicly shared, and

(b)B had, or A reasonably believes that B had, consented to the previous sharing.
Click to expand...

That still might not apply in a porn website type scenario which is why I think it possibly not relevant. There are websites that specialise in 'leaked' stuff, so someone surfing on there would know that and would probably know it was something not intended to be shared.

I suppose we'll see if someone gets charged or not....or possibly investigated for months and months.
 
NotTheDoctor26 said:
In the Stephen Bear case, she didn’t know she was being filmed. When she found out he had used the cctv to record it, she begged him to delete it but he shared it for money on his of.
Click to expand...

Yes, but she was in a voluntarily intimate state, that's the bit I was getting at, as it says it's an exemption, so I don't quite understand it.

'(c)B was, or A reasonably believes that B was, in the intimate state voluntarily.''
 
HistrionicSites said:
If they found it on a porn site, then they have a defence.

‘the defendant reasonably believed that the material was previously disclosed for reward and had no reason to believe that the previous disclosure for reward was made without the consent of the individual’.
Click to expand...
It is on Fapello, I looked yesterday, But I don’t know when it was uploaded, so it’s a possibility.
I’ve not seen any video, but lots of links from porn sites offering links to other things and using the Tag of KFP

I’m going throw another Name into the ring of the 30’s Exs, Alex Adderson, and he was accused by family and friends of being controlling and had access to Skanks finances, He also bought her a Black Range Rover, However he hasn’t been heard of for years

Also Junior has Attended a Film premiere in London this evening with his GF

In regards to the 💩💩💩💩 photo and location and could be the MM, the only thing that correlates is Grey carpet and bedding, from what I’ve seen you can’t see a headboard???
 
Rita Chevrolet said:
Who is responsible for this bullshit Helena?
---

I guess it would look tiny stuck onto that Space Hopper!
Click to expand...
I seriously don't know how her skin contains those ludicrous implants. One of these days her chest is going to explode and there will be silicone flying in all directions. I hope she isn't in the supermarket when it happens - "clean up in Aisle 4 .... jet wash needed". 🤣🤣🤣
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top