mammywhite
Chatty Member
Is it possible that SS themselves have deemed the price clang unsuitable for difffent reasons ie
AFP and her husband are maybe seen to be to old and are at higher risk of passing before B&J reach 18 which would mean more uprooting for them
SFP maybe they see her flat as to small as there isn’t enough bedrooms to accommodate them
Like I said yesterday I’m not sure how SS would work in this situation are their checks for potential carers more stringent if the kids involved are being removed due to child protection the reason I ask this is my mam died when I was 4 I was an only child and no dad on the scene so I went to live with my mams sister and her family there was no legal process it was just done (although this was early 80s) are the checks more strict with child protection? Maybe skank herself said she wanted her family to have them and when checks were done they were found unsuitable and skank being skank would rather they went into care than back down over KH
AFP and her husband are maybe seen to be to old and are at higher risk of passing before B&J reach 18 which would mean more uprooting for them
SFP maybe they see her flat as to small as there isn’t enough bedrooms to accommodate them
Like I said yesterday I’m not sure how SS would work in this situation are their checks for potential carers more stringent if the kids involved are being removed due to child protection the reason I ask this is my mam died when I was 4 I was an only child and no dad on the scene so I went to live with my mams sister and her family there was no legal process it was just done (although this was early 80s) are the checks more strict with child protection? Maybe skank herself said she wanted her family to have them and when checks were done they were found unsuitable and skank being skank would rather they went into care than back down over KH