Katie Price #314 Skankys latest egg is a psycho killer - anything for Podcast filler

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
265 said:
Grifters will Grift.... Please Take Skanky with you.

screenshot-2023-09-02-210244-png.2422017
Click to expand...
All her plastic would melt 😂😂😂
---
Salyara said:
View attachment 2422149 q

He's wearing JY Would you knockoff slippers isn't he?
Courtesy of bffs Skank and Jeyda, think he won a double up and got them in black too?
Click to expand...
Got his skinny filter back on I see ...too late, everyone has seen the real FLF in his jiggly pot bellied flesh... and we know that's not your jawline 😂😂😂
 
Cowpat said:
Going back to the previous thread and the chat about KP's family saying no to taking the kids on if it goes to prison, do you think they have said no in the hope that that means she won't get sent down, as there will be no-one to look after Jett and bunny, as it seems like they are arrogant and stupid enough to believe that.
Click to expand...
I’m m thinking they may think if they say no J & B will be left where they are, they might have suggested they keep distant supervision ( no that that’s helped up til now ) . I’m sure it’s been spelled out though. I think it’s positive if they are going to be removed , it means one step closer to getting back home. As others have said they may need slow integration back to their blended family. The whole thing is a tit show if her making, leaving 2 vulnerable children in the middle of it, and glad people in authority are challenging her on it now.
 
Last edited:
Angelic37 said:
Tbf there's it not being financially ideal and then there's having to give up work and being unable to pay for bills or food. For some it wouldn't just be difficult or tightening belts, it would be literally financially impossible.
Click to expand...
I just had another thought. Highly unlikely but bear with me. AFP knows skank us a nightmare, she knows about the drugs What if they only defend her in public but give her hell behind closed doors. Maybe in this scenario they think by refusing/ not being able ti take them it will shock her into doing something , or taking accountability for her actions. I know it’s a long shot 🤷‍♀️
 
Last edited:
Angelic37 said:
Tbf there's it not being financially ideal and then there's having to give up work and being unable to pay for bills or food. For some it wouldn't just be difficult or tightening belts, it would be literally financially impossible.
Click to expand...

And so many families do that anyway, many, many people aren't necessarily well off or in full-time employment. People who don't work and care for people do have entitlements. I just hold that view I suppose, better off poor with caring relatives rather than in care. Each to their own.
 
life’s a car crash said:
I just had another thought. Highly unlikely but bear with me. AFP knows skank us a nightmare, she knows about the drugs What if they only defend her in public but give her hell behind closed doors. Maybe in this scenario they think by refusing/ not being able ti take them it will shock her into doing something , or taking accountability for her actions. I know it’s a king shot 🤷‍♀️
Click to expand...
I keep trying to think like that, for a long time I have tried to give SFP and AFP the benefit of the doubt. However, what finally made me realise they don't have a single decent bone in their bodies was the book of lies from AFP. That did it for me and much as I would like to think they have good motives, everything they have ever done in regards to enabling the Skank, tells me otherwise 😞
 
Helena-botham-farter said:
So the alternative is accepting young relatives in care. I would work round it personally. work less hours and take the child benefits and other help available but that's just my opinion. (y)
Click to expand...
I think there would be more help available, some employers give the equivalent of maternity leave in these circumstances, also I think I would be insistent that they both went to school which would mean less upheaval .
 
Helena-botham-farter said:
And so many families do that anyway, many, many people aren't necessarily well off or in full-time employment. People who don't work and care for people do have entitlements. I just hold that view I suppose, better off poor with caring relatives rather than in care. Each to their own.
Click to expand...
I'm not talking about being poor though. Millions are sadly, and just about manage bless them. I'm talking about losing the roof above their heads and being unable to eat. I got pregnant at 25. I had a mortgage and lived alone. If I'd had the baby I would have had to give up work. I wouldn't have been eligible for housing benefit with a mortgage. I would have ended up homeless. I was estranged from my family and there was no one who could take me in. So I had no choice but to have an abortion. It's not about money being tight. Sometimes it's about literally not being able to keep the roof above your head. Entitlements aren't always enough to survive off. I know. I've lived it.
 
Winepig said:
I’d not even noticed it to be honest lovely 🖤

I prefer to concentrate on positivity .
And getting The Skanky , getting the Skanky, getting The Skanky 🎶
Click to expand...

Ooh winey, could that be a New Model Army reference? ;)

Well my heart goes out to all you Krusties that have had some serious troubles (and not made-up dwamatic twaumas for newspapers / tv etc) bless you all for sharing 🥰 x

I am so grateful to have had the best 70s, Northern, cheapskate, happiest childhood ever - I know, pretty rare!

I've forgotten what i came on here to say now, but anyway - no, I'm still not taking any of you in, you'll have to make your own way in life now. 😜
 
Just in case I don’t catch up before midnight, happy birthday for yesterday Dolly, I’m so happy you had a (mostly) good day 😘😘😘

Skanky is obviously still a bleep, but now the Price Clan really are outed as the uncaring, self-involved/obsessed, money grabbing, bunch of begging freeloaders who are bleeping off to the IOW now the gravy train has derailed and crashed head on into the Skanky bleep’s mountain of bleeping consequences. Yes they are all clearly mothers of the year - if you put them amongst the ranks of Rose West, Baby P’s mother, Karen Matthew’s and the bleeping McCann’s.
 
Angelic37 said:
I'm not talking about being poor though. Millions are sadly, and just about manage bless them. I'm talking about losing the roof above their heads and being unable to eat. I got pregnant at 25. I had a mortgage and lived alone. If I'd had the baby I would have had to give up work. I wouldn't have been eligible for housing benefit with a mortgage. I would have ended up homeless. I was estranged from my family and there was no one who could take me in. So I had no choice but to have an abortion. It's not about money being tight. Sometimes it's about literally not being able to keep the roof above your head. Entitlements aren't always enough to survive off. I know. I've lived it.
Click to expand...

Sorry to hear that, it sounds a grim time but there are other entitlements available for people taking on kids, fostering allowance so a different situation really. That's the situation I'm trying to describe.
 
Facehugger said:
I'm still catching up with the last thread, but peoples expectations of that Skanks family members should put their lives completely on hold to accommodate J & B if the worst happens isn't realistic. As much as everyone would like to be able to do that, in the real world it might not be possible for a variety of reasons.

In my opinion only, if that were me having it presented to me that I'm the kids' Granny or Auntie so it's expected that I should drop everything to take them on, well I'd be saying no I can't, sorry. I've got to work 7.30am to 5pm every day just to pay my own bills and keep a roof over my own head, how do you expect me to accommodate these kids and not earn a living at the same time?

I feel some people might think they know everything about her family's finances, but maybe there are very good reasons that NONE of them can take these children on without question just at the moment.
Click to expand...
You make it work between you if one person can’t manage alone. My sister was killed by a drunk driver nearly two years ago leaving 4 children behind. I’m a nurse who works in A and E full time and my husband works full time too. We have three children of our own and instantly took them in as our own. It’s bloody hard work but we manage. For family, especially children, you move heaven and earth to look after those children.

sorry, this is a very emotive subject for me. At least one of her relatives could take them.
 
Don't cuntlung and Mr PP own their house outright (maybe wrong) but no mortgage payment and cuntlung doesn't work and Mr PP owns his own business so he could price a job up cut down his hours and leave his minions to do the work (he'd still be on the same amount of money) and as it's been pointed out there would be help both financially and i'm sure SS would provide a carer to help cuntlungs daily with school runs and around the house. So the question is WHY haven't any of the gravy train cunts stepped forward. 🤬
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top