Jodie Marsh and Fripps Farm #33 Pipe down Bin Shady. You can't touch us! STOP! #hammertime

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
NotClaire said:
It was under the new post which showed her friends replies but the whole post has now been deleted! 😮
Click to expand...
Here's the text transcribed from the image, so that it can be searched for and found in the future (with some spelling corrections and altered punctuation) :

Jodie is struggling all her friends and family know she is struggling. She's got an addiction to hoarding, animals, cloths, bags etc. She is struggling to cope with the animals. There's around 700 animals in her garden. She doesn't show half of them. She has a group of hedgehogs in a tiny enclosure, living in filth and boredom. There's rats everywhere, 1000's of rats. They are out of control. Her house is a mess; boxes, shoes and filth in every room. The cat room isn't cleaned daily; the cats are miserable and the smell is horrendous. The genet died; the 3-legged fox died; another fox died. The poor dogs are abused; not walked or loved - forgotten toys. This situation is only going to get worse, much worse. The poor animals are suffering, really suffering. Steph has proof, lots of proof. The truth will come out very soon.
Click to expand...
 
Is Randolph the 3 legged fox?

The comment above says the 3 legged fox is dead.

Jodie says Randolph is fine.

Screenshot_20241128-155440_Instagram.jpg


Am I getting the foxes mixed up?
 
Amanda abingdon is an utter bleep anyway so no shock there. I can't bear watching anything with her in it.
Jodes has tarted herself up today, she's looking for a man for Christmas. Whatever she does she looks bleeping dead behind the eyes.
I thought about the animals a lot last night when I put my horses to bed with thick rugs and huge nets full of hay. Her poor lot never get that luxury. She's too busy eye bleeping the camera and playing with her new toys.
bleep.
 
UtterlyLiterallyAmazing said:
I wonder if she’s having photos done today to go with an article because that’s when she slaps on the bisto.
Click to expand...
It’s amazing that it’s changed so much, I totally had the years of it being a me problem if I was to speak up. Shouting out when someone got touchy on the tube and being told be everyone to shut up.
Jodie will never reveal this evidence as it probably doesn’t exist, but she’s thicker than the bisto on her eyelids if she thinks complaining about these things happening on her watch will help. We all saw Only Grans Jodie. None of those participants are still doing one tit modelling online, we all see how you behave.
---
Marmalade Atkins said:
Is Randolph the 3 legged fox?

The comment above says the 3 legged fox is dead.

Jodie says Randolph is fine.

View attachment 3292680 q

Am I getting the foxes mixed up?
Click to expand...
Which fox was Sirius?
 
Phil Anne Throw Pee said:
Why can't the authorities/council intervene and get her shut down or at the very least stop her getting any more animals? I genuinely don't understand how she's allowed to get away with it.
Click to expand...
This is the problem though. There’s no “laws” against hoarding animals. It was always going to come to a public slandering match because she hasn’t been doing anything really wrong. And inspections by each body RSPCA, APHA etc will tell you what to do to improve firstly, I reckon that’s what has happened in the past. Nobody wants to have to step in and close it down overnight unless it’s a literal past-the-point of no return (it’s nearly there). It actually needs public pressure to prise the animals out of her hands.
 
HotesTilaire said:
It’s amazing that it’s changed so much, I totally had the years of it being a me problem if I was to speak up. Shouting out when someone got touchy on the tube and being told be everyone to shut up.
Jodie will never reveal this evidence as it probably doesn’t exist, but she’s thicker than the bisto on her eyelids if she thinks complaining about these things happening on her watch will help. We all saw Only Grans Jodie. None of those participants are still doing one tit modelling online, we all see how you behave.
---

Which fox was Sirius?
Click to expand...
Sirius was the one with pins in his front leg. He was captured and limping badly and taken to a vet. The pins had moved and he was PTS.
 
Phil Anne Throw Pee said:
Why can't the authorities/council intervene and get her shut down or at the very least stop her getting any more animals? I genuinely don't understand how she's allowed to get away with it.
Click to expand...
I asked google :

what crime are animal hoarders most commonly charged with in the UK?
Click to expand...

Reply :
The most common charge for animal hoarding in the UK is a breach of the Animal Welfare Act 2006. This act requires those responsible for animals to take reasonable steps to meet their needs, including providing a suitable diet and environment, and protecting them from pain, suffering, injury, or disease.

Animal hoarding is considered a form of cruelty to animals because it can lead to disease and death. Hoarders often fail to provide basic care for their animals, and the consequences can be long-lasting.

Penalties for animal hoarding can include: Fines, Forfeiture of the animals, Jail time, A ban on owning animals in the future, and A limit on the number of animals that can be owned.

In 2021, Parliament passed the Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Act, which increased the maximum sentence for animal cruelty offences to five years' custody.

Generative AI is experimental.
Click to expand...

Needless to say - and to answer your question - there would have to be sufficient evidence prior to a prosecution, and because the law specifies qualitative factors, it's not always clear when the legal line is crossed. Authorities will want to have high confidence that intervention is the right thing, in part because the costs of getting it wrong can be high. (For example, stepping in to "rescue" an animal from someone who is ultimately able to satisfy the courts that they are taking proper care of the animal effectively puts authorities into the position of being animal kidnappers).
 
sweeetcorn said:
I asked google :



Reply :


Needless to say - and to answer your question - there would have to be sufficient evidence prior to a prosecution, and because the law specifies qualitative factors, it's not always clear when the legal line is crossed. Authorities will want to have high confidence that intervention is the right thing, in part because the costs of getting it wrong can be high. (For example, stepping in to "rescue" an animal from someone who is ultimately able to satisfy the courts that they are taking proper care of the animal effectively puts authorities into the position of being animal kidnappers).
Click to expand...
Luckily, Jodie has been generating loads of evidence
 
littleBeeMe said:
I can't find that post on FF now; I'm hoping its because action has at last been taken against JM, and they have been advised to remove it
Click to expand...

i agree and considering the sheds and breaking rules on the covenants that if i remember the council are investigating why cant the council use their powers and do a check under the covenants fripps is breaking,the council would be able to inspect the sheds etc and probably see the utter mess that is fripps and then contact rspca etc as im sure they would have good reason

i just dont understand why the council being so slow the covenants has been going on for months and months and im guessing the winter paddocks should not of been built as a permanent structure,so many reasons the council have the right to visit

its all so fustrating
 
lovesthegossipmx said:
i agree and considering the sheds and breaking rules on the covenants that if i remember the council are investigating why cant the council use their powers and do a check under the covenants fripps is breaking,the council would be able to inspect the sheds etc and probably see the utter mess that is fripps and then contact rspca etc as im sure they would have good reason

i just dont understand why the council being so slow the covenants has been going on for months and months and im guessing the winter paddocks should not of been built as a permanent structure,so many reasons the council have the right to visit

its all so fustrating
Click to expand...
The covenants unfortunatley are nothing to do with the council. The neighbours house imposed the covenants when they sold Jodie's house to protect themselves and future owners of any development. We had a house that had restrictive covenants and it's a civil matter.
The containers and sheds in the paddock fall under the jurisdiction of the council, but they seem to be doing f*ck all about them.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top