Jack Monroe #542 A dullard talking about Vienetta

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Didn’t anyone ever tell her libraries have free internet. They’re also warm and there are books/toys for small children to mess about with to keep them amused.

Im sure she said something about other people being given flexible working and not her. Unless something else was going on then that would be constructive dismissal.
No one is going to be able to do a job 30 miles away with a tiny child without a strong support network, even if they drive. Either something changed or she never actually returned from maternity. It was never going to work even if it was part time/ days only without extended childcare anyway.
 
rage naan said:
bleeping hell at this. In lieu of maintenance? What's that supposed to mean? I've never seen a custody arrangement described like that. This is pure conjecture but it sounds like she described him in the most disparaging possible way. "Oh yeah he won't pay up so instead I force him to look after the kid."
Surely he's paying for the kids upkeep while he has him, & surely joint custody is so the kid can be looked after by both parents, both of whom want to spend time with him, not a punitive financial arrangement. This one really annoys me and I'm struggling to express exactly why but you get the idea.
Click to expand...

Don’t forget, that guest’s level of parenting is to pay her son - then too young to be on Twitter, according to their terms and conditions - to experience the snipes and abuse and threats and harassment and defamation aimed at his own mother.

D30F849A-5057-4172-BDEE-BC02F8B6F5B0.jpeg

AA62AFDB-BF4B-400A-82BD-0A2B194C6A30.jpeg


Maybe don’t just don’t expose a CHILD to the despicable horrors of social media in the first place, pet.
 
I noticed the other day that a friend of mine has a Mulberry Bayswater bag and she was thinking of selling it on as she's got a small kid and is feeling the pinch. She told me it cost £1000!!! but that she might get a couple of hundred for it now, given that it's in really good condition with no marks on it and the original dustbag, accessories etc. I personally cannot imagine spending that much on a handbag (and instantly became paranoid I was going to have some kind of wild spasm and tip my drink on it).

The more I think about guest pleading poverty and PTSD of envelopes while repeatedly double dipping into her book allowances for designer goods, the more furious I get. She's wasted THOUSANDS that she genuinely earned that she could have saved to help her and SB get their forever home, and instead she's begging on the internet for money and fleecing hundreds of idiot Patrons every month for SFA. bleep.
 
Just mithering about this and if they’d actually given her the job.

IMG_4430.jpeg


IMG_4432.jpeg

“Hello, is this Mr. C. Helmsford-Essex, of Chelmsford, Essex?
☎ “This is he”.
“This is Dr. Dr. (to be) Jack ‘Military Around The Edges’ Monroe of my Daddy’s the FIRE service speaking. I’ve got you on my list for installation of a smoke alarm today, and (it’s the tiny shiny buttony cutest thing!) I’m a smol adorable pixie ex-grammar school and book token award-winning scamp who doesn’t drive FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REASONS, so what I’ll need you to do is come and pick me up from my luxury executive £725 a month Royal Mews flat in Southend and bring me to your house. Then five hours later when I’m done installing your one smoke alarm and giving you my expert opinion on dogs on beaches, dog fouling, iPads in the hospitals, classrooms in portakabins, painting the Civic, truants, the lack of haberdashers, and the COUNCIL, if you could nip me over to Mr. Basil Don-Essex of Basildon, Essex’s gaff cos I’ve got to do one for him too.”
☎….(confused speechless silence)
“Oh, and I don’t have a parking space in this damp mouldy carpetless shithole so you’ll have to wait on the double yellows. If you’re waiting longer than 4 hours, call my agent that I don’t yet have and DEFINITELY my ex girlfriend!”
☎…(confused speechless silence)
“Oh and on your way here, pop into the big Sainsbury’s and get me some bread and jam (Mummy) would you? I’m waiting in for my Abel and Cole delivery! They’re late again this week 🤬Those Jerusalem artichokes don’t deliver themselves you know!”
☎ (the line goes dead)
“Thanks! My Daddy’s Essex Fire Service at YOUR service! Don’tputmetalinthemicrowave! BYEEEEEEE!!!”
 
Last edited:
MavisBeacon said:
I noticed the other day that a friend of mine has a Mulberry Bayswater bag and she was thinking of selling it on as she's got a small kid and is feeling the pinch. She told me it cost £1000!!! but that she might get a couple of hundred for it now, given that it's in really good condition with no marks on it and the original dustbag, accessories etc. I personally cannot imagine spending that much on a handbag (and instantly became paranoid I was going to have some kind of wild spasm and tip my drink on it).

The more I think about guest pleading poverty and PTSD of envelopes while repeatedly double dipping into her book allowances for designer goods, the more furious I get. She's wasted THOUSANDS that she genuinely earned that she could have saved to help her and SB get their forever home, and instead she's begging on the internet for money and fleecing hundreds of idiot Patrons every month for SFA. bleep.
Click to expand...

Yup. I’ve got a Gucci bamboo medium bag with extra accessories which costs well in excess of £4,500 new. I paid £520 fully authenticated at a very posh auction, so the vendor would only have received about £430 after fees. The second-hand designer goods market is thriving but if you’re selling, you are doomed to lose at least 80% of what you paid for it, even if you have cared well for it. And we all know how well guest treats her easy-come, easy-go thankyou-patrons purchases. She’d be lucky to get £30 for her battered Mulberry at auction, as even superb condition ones go for around £100-200 (more likely that it would be rejected though, they are VERY fussy about consignments). Much investment.

ETA to pop under a spoiler.
 
Last edited:
rage naan said:
View attachment 2448173 q

bleeping hell at this. In lieu of maintenance? What's that supposed to mean? I've never seen a custody arrangement described like that. This is pure conjecture but it sounds like she described him in the most disparaging possible way. "Oh yeah he won't pay up so instead I force him to look after the kid."
Surely he's paying for the kids upkeep while he has him, & surely joint custody is so the kid can be looked after by both parents, both of whom want to spend time with him, not a punitive financial arrangement. This one really annoys me and I'm struggling to express exactly why but you get the idea.
Click to expand...
IMG_4436.jpeg


I suppose it’s a step up from this at least.
IMG_4434.jpeg
IMG_4435.jpeg

www.mirror.co.uk

Living in poverty: Young mum has just £10 a week for food

No heating and no Christmas tree as mother strives to feed herself and her son
www.mirror.co.uk www.mirror.co.uk
 
BeardyBap said:
At a glance (happy to be corrected):
AirPods
A smart watch
KitchenAid copper mixer
Multiple tins Del Monte prunes (freebies from £10k? sponsorship deal)
Oh yeah. Desperate, crushing, grinding poverty. Boiling candles to make firepit lighters. Won't anyone think of the Povs, some of them don't even have a single BAFTA on the mantle piece.
(Beaten to it by @Lazarus )
Click to expand...
Every time I see a picture of her kitchen I just get the ick
Ignoring the very spenny kitchen aid, everything looks sticky and over crowded - you can’t seriously prep food on those counters
 
Lumpyspaceprincess said:
Didn’t anyone ever tell her libraries have free internet. They’re also warm and there are books/toys for small children to mess about with to keep them amused.

Im sure she said something about other people being given flexible working and not her. Unless something else was going on then that would be constructive dismissal.
No one is going to be able to do a job 30 miles away with a tiny child without a strong support network, even if they drive. Either something changed or she never actually returned from maternity. It was never going to work even if it was part time/ days only without extended childcare anyway.
Click to expand...
Who knows what really happened given she can’t get through a paragraph of text without throwing in a whopper. But yes, what she described does sound like maternity discrimination/ constructive dismissal.

I used to have an acquaintance who was an emergency call handler and did work bonkers shifts from when her kids were still babies. But she had a lot of support from her partner and family.
 
Valiofthedolls said:
View attachment 2448342 q

I suppose it’s a step up from this at least.
View attachment 2448344 qView attachment 2448346 q
www.mirror.co.uk

Living in poverty: Young mum has just £10 a week for food

No heating and no Christmas tree as mother strives to feed herself and her son
www.mirror.co.uk www.mirror.co.uk
Click to expand...

I’m inclined to believe there’s some truth to it, because he’s never (that we know of) objected or demanded a correction - and his tweet saying she’d changed SB’s name revealed quite a bit about the formal responsibility he’d taken at that point (ie not even the bare minimum if she could do that).

I am firm in my belief that he’s been consistently failed by both parents. Jack is a narc bleep and his dad may well be better than her, but that’s damning him with faint praise.

Neither of them have done what they need to ensure he and his privacy are respected and while I doubt Jack cares to, his dad has evidence most parents could only dream of to ensure he could indeed protect his son - if he hasn’t which it doesn’t seem he has, he has chosen not to and by that token he’s enabled Jack to do what she does to SB as much as he enabled the absolutely reprehensible kitten treatment when he allegedly gave her the kitten.
 
rage naan said:
View attachment 2448173 q

bleeping hell at this. In lieu of maintenance? What's that supposed to mean? I've never seen a custody arrangement described like that. This is pure conjecture but it sounds like she described him in the most disparaging possible way. "Oh yeah he won't pay up so instead I force him to look after the kid."
Surely he's paying for the kids upkeep while he has him, & surely joint custody is so the kid can be looked after by both parents, both of whom want to spend time with him, not a punitive financial arrangement. This one really annoys me and I'm struggling to express exactly why but you get the idea.
Click to expand...
She's probably coining about five times what SB's dad is anyway. I would have thought that she would have to pay him. (Or would if she admitted how much she was grifting)
 
RandomFishOils said:
Don’t forget, that guest’s level of parenting is to pay her son - then too young to be on Twitter, according to their terms and conditions - to experience the snipes and abuse and threats and harassment and defamation aimed at his own mother.

View attachment 2448269 q
View attachment 2448270 q

Maybe don’t just don’t expose a CHILD to the despicable horrors of social media in the first place, pet.
Click to expand...
Especially the "I had to resort to sex work" and "I shagged Burgerboi for six hours straight" and "I drank a gallon of whisky and lay in a bath of cold water and tried to unalive myself" and "Having a child ruined any chance I ever had of getting a decent job and this is why I have to eat gravel" sort of stuff.
---
BlendedSlop said:
Found the pic of the spray-painted Kitchenaid. Lol:

View attachment 2448387 q

How very Jack to buy something so expensive then, rather than take care of it, completely ruin it with a botched DIY job.

Oh, wait - it was a gift (because of course it was :rolleyes:) and she never would have done this if she'd spent her own money on it.

View attachment 2448391 qView attachment 2448393 q

What a bleep.

SS @Marmalade Atkins and @Silver Linings
Click to expand...

What a bleep.

Isn't she just! 😡

If I was lucky enough to be given something like that I would treat it with respect and take care of it. She has no idea of gratitude.
 
Last edited:
Valiofthedolls said:
It’s the absolute level of entitlement, arrogance (and downright bleeping disdain for everyone and everything she clearly thinks is beneath her) oozing from her every bleeping pore that really gets to me. bleeping Macebearer to the Mayoralty, the Commonwealth Political Affairs Division and Overseeing hospital food provision in the UK. Oh, and ghastly minimum wage jobs from people who won’t even take my CV
View attachment 2448021 qView attachment 2448022 q

View attachment 2448068 qView attachment 2448069 q

View attachment 2448025 q
View attachment 2448023 q
View attachment 2448024 qView attachment 2448071 q

View attachment 2448072 q
Actually, every single word of that post from March 13th.
View attachment 2448028 qView attachment 2448030 qView attachment 2448031 qView attachment 2448032 q
She could be the Chief Executive of being perennially bleeping deluded though, I’ll give her that.
View attachment 2448033 qSeriously, how can anyone be that much of an insufferable bleep at 24?

Wankee Wanker indeed (as always ❤to @People-huv-tae-know for one of the best ever tattle posts)
Click to expand...
Nibbling a raw mushroom?! 🤣🤣🤣 that has finished me ☠️
 
CabalofBolorneaise said:
I’m inclined to believe there’s some truth to it, because he’s never (that we know of) objected or demanded a correction - and his tweet saying she’d changed SB’s name revealed quite a bit about the formal responsibility he’d taken at that point (ie not even the bare minimum if she could do that).

I am firm in my belief that he’s been consistently failed by both parents. Jack is a narc bleep and his dad may well be better than her, but that’s damning him with faint praise.

Neither of them have done what they need to ensure he and his privacy are respected and while I doubt Jack cares to, his dad has evidence most parents could only dream of to ensure he could indeed protect his son - if he hasn’t which it doesn’t seem he has, he has chosen not to and by that token he’s enabled Jack to do what she does to SB as much as he enabled the absolutely reprehensible kitten treatment when he allegedly gave her the kitten.
Click to expand...
I think you’re right, though I do definitely get the sense (from Jack and Big D at least, if not Ma Ev too) that they think the Hadjs are his family’s “betters”. I can see his family being deferential to hers, them absolutely expecting and feeling entitled to that (and her family being patrician pricks to his). I can also see them bring impressed with/deferential to her “fame”.

Those Hadjs of the Watches! Their Jack may duck down, but (as befits the good family name and reputation), she marries up. Well she’s been unsuccessfully attempting it for over a decade, at least.
 
BlendedSlop said:
Found the pic of the spray-painted Kitchenaid. Lol:

View attachment 2448387 q

How very Jack to buy something so expensive then, rather than take care of it, completely ruin it with a botched DIY job.

Oh, wait - it was a gift (because of course it was :rolleyes:) and she never would have done this if she'd spent her own money on it.

View attachment 2448391 qView attachment 2448393 q

What a bleep.

SS @Marmalade Atkins and @Silver Linings
Click to expand...
bleeping fucker.

I don't know why exactly but this Kitchen Aid thing has me seething.

Jokily, she says it's fine to mess it up with paint because it was gifted? Are gifts less precious than things you buy yourself in your world Jack? Or by "gift" do you mean a corporate freebie which we should interpret as meaning that there's lots of those knocking around?

And did you use food safe paint, eh, guest? Cos I don't think nail varnish flakes sparkling in a bowl of slops is very healthy?

I dunno, folks. Gonna have to go out and touch some grass.
 
BlendedSlop said:
Found the pic of the spray-painted Kitchenaid. Lol:

View attachment 2448387 q

How very Jack to buy something so expensive then, rather than take care of it, completely ruin it with a botched DIY job.

Oh, wait - it was a gift (because of course it was :rolleyes:) and she never would have done this if she'd spent her own money on it.

View attachment 2448391 qView attachment 2448393 q

What a bleep.

SS @Marmalade Atkins and @Silver Linings
Click to expand...
So if you bought it yourself it would be looked after like your second born child but if someone else bought it for you you’re happy to ruin it?

Reason #27943469 why she has no real friends.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top