bowiethesdmn
VIP Member
Spotted this piece in Private Eye about who has been making claims for furlough money. They’ve been doing some digging. Anyone know how to access the list?
View attachment 534932 q
Awaiting 'mendicants' to pop up on
Spotted this piece in Private Eye about who has been making claims for furlough money. They’ve been doing some digging. Anyone know how to access the list?
View attachment 534932 q
I think it's fair and good manners to squiggle out their info (just imo)Question - why do we squiggle the squiggles if they have their tweets set to public?
Is it actually necessary @Pocahontas? x
I guess we squiggle cos they’re not blue ticks? And they may not want their stuff shared on a tattle thread? You have a point though if the tweets are public - anyone can see, right? (I’m following the thread precedent, which I think is a good one).Question - why do we squiggle the squiggles if they have their tweets set to public?
Is it actually necessary @Pocahontas? x
Yeah, I've always wondered about it as once you put something out in the public domain you essentially lose ownership of it??I guess we squiggle cos they’re not blue ticks? And they may not want their stuff shared on a tattle thread? You have a point though if the tweets are public - anyone can see, right? (I’m following the thread precedent, which I think is a good one).
I think it's fair and good manners to squiggle out their info (just imo)
I guess it’s just best to afford anonymity to people who aren’t directly linked to Jack on here. They may have a public twitter or Instagram but that doesn’t necessarily mean they want to be talked about on a Jack Monroe thread? Because if their names are shown here, then everyone goes to have a look see at their Twitter and they might not want the scrutiny. (Even though the trifle defender certainly is aware of Jack )Yeah, I've always wondered about it as once you put something out in the public domain you essentially lose ownership of it??
I just wondered if it was a Tattle rule or we were just being respectful.
Agree. I was just curious to know if it was just us or a Tattle necessity.
Are we sure these two are different people?
Seriously tho, how it it possible to be *this* irritating?First one is in response to her suggesting something with the tiger bread from yesterday. The ‘smol pixie’ one I posted is actually the most recent, I went back for these. View attachment 535060 qView attachment 535061 qView attachment 535063 qView attachment 535064 qView attachment 535065 qView attachment 535067 qView attachment 535068 qView attachment 535069 q
She doesn't understand proportions. She looks like Will Ferrell in Elf in that photo!She's posted the pic of her with her fake grin at the kiddie desk and tell me how this makes sense ....
View attachment 535053 q
If it's just that she's a smol pixie, she would look smoller (sorry) on a normal-sized chair at a normal-sized desk. But she looks like a giant in MEANING IT'S A SMOL DESK AND CHAIR.
Idiot.
Elf, pixie ... it’s all the same for smol dickheads.
Seriously tho, how it it possible to be *this* irritating?