waffle maker
VIP Member
Because she was never doxed and it’s less embarrassing than the truth.I've just had a fought. Why is she plastering all over her twitter that she's been doxxed. If that was me I'd be too ashamed to let anyone know.
Because she was never doxed and it’s less embarrassing than the truth.I've just had a fought. Why is she plastering all over her twitter that she's been doxxed. If that was me I'd be too ashamed to let anyone know.
Why does she say her son "has agency over his own decisions"?
But then if someone is worried about their children being safe online it would be worrying that adults could easily bypass AML procedures to open an account.
And you only really have “agency” if you are in possession of all the facts upon which to make your decisions.Why does she say her son "has agency over his own decisions"?
What is wrong with saying her son "makes his own decisions"? "Has agency over" is redundant in that sentence, it's extra words for no reason. It doesn't make if clearer, it doesn't mean anything different and it doesn't make her sound clever.
I think it’s more about proving that GH have robust compliance procedures that must be followed if a complaint is raised.That bit I get, it was the jump then to kids being befriended by someone and trusting them more as they had a GH account that I think is pushing it.
I’m sure the accounts are used for county lines type things, which is likely why GH took action based on Jack’s claims (whether they were true or not) and I obviously know people lie about their age to prey on children, but I don’t think a GH is generally being treated as the gold standard of age proof - I mean, it’s a physical card so they can be stolen?
But she thinks it does though.Why does she say her son "has agency over his own decisions"?
What is wrong with saying her son "makes his own decisions"? "Has agency over" is redundant in that sentence, it's extra words for no reason. It doesn't make if clearer, it doesn't mean anything different and it doesn't make her sound clever.
Excuse me but don't you know she needs three pairs of poverty pants?Oh my gosh. Can you all imagine how it would look if Little Miss Poverty Pants was actually prosecuted for fraud and money laundering? It would be the ultimate poetic justice for all her role play fairy story nonsense.
I love this squiggle.Is this how you do screenshots? Hopefully I’ve done it properly
I've 'known' this twitter user for years (like, I don't know them, know them, and I don't follow them for some reason but I've seen their tweets around, I have a feeling we have similar interests and probably have some mutuals in common, so they sometimes appear on my timeline in conversation with others) and I have to say, I was really relieved someone like them saw through Jack when their screenshots first appeared here, because they're decent and intelligent and definitely not a troll. While I see what you're saying, I don't think it's too odd for them to be concerned that a child's pocket money account, used for their own children, is being used by adults, because beyond anything else, it's frankly a bit creepy? I know Jack has an almost non-existent embarrassment threshold, but I don't understand why even she wouldn't cringe with shame when handing it over to a supermarket cashier. I mean, obvs we know it didn't happen, but it's such an irresponsible thing to put on social media, advising other adults that this is a good budget tactic.For me it would kind of do the opposite though. It’s such an odd jump that it sounds like a made up concern to use as a reason for reporting
Every time a grifter lies, a Tattler is born.
I've 'known' this twitter user for years (like, I don't know them, know them, and I don't follow them for some reason but I've seen their tweets around, I have a feeling we have similar interests and probably have some mutuals in common, so they sometimes appear on my timeline in conversation with others) and I have to say, I was really relieved someone like them saw through Jack when their screenshots first appeared here, because they're decent and intelligent and definitely not a troll. While I see what you're saying, I don't think it's too odd for them to be concerned that a child's pocket money account, used for their own children, is being used by adults, because beyond anything else, it's frankly a bit creepy? I know Jack has an almost non-existent embarrassment threshold, but I don't understand why even she wouldn't cringe with shame when handing it over to a supermarket cashier. I mean, obvs we know it didn't happen, but it's such an irresponsible thing to put on social media, advising other adults that this is a good budget tactic.
At least we’d write some half decent recipesWe should write her book for her. It's not going to write itself Jack unless you have some Harry Potter style typewriter that works by itself
How dare you...she was gifted and talented don’t you know!Why does she say her son "has agency over his own decisions"?
What is wrong with saying her son "makes his own decisions"? "Has agency over" is redundant in that sentence, it's extra words for no reason. It doesn't make if clearer, it doesn't mean anything different and it doesn't make her sound clever.