Jwren
VIP Member
As you say that’s your opinion, it’s not mine. As I said I don’t know enough about them to make that judgement.I would say IMO it's not really for the parents to profit off this whole sorry situation, is it.
As you say that’s your opinion, it’s not mine. As I said I don’t know enough about them to make that judgement.I would say IMO it's not really for the parents to profit off this whole sorry situation, is it.
Yep, me too, and the countdown to Linzi Dawn Mckenzies 16th birthday so they could do “the big reveal” of her page 3 photosI'm old enough to remember the days of page 3 of the Sun when they were showing 16 year olds topless. I know it was a few years ago but it's largely the same people in charge - and I find this outrage they seem to display over this 17 year old quite disingenuous.
"That little witch "And Queen Kim!
That's very much the experience of many people suffering from sex or porn addiction. I think that would explain much of Huw's behaviour.I’m really beginning to wonder whether his way of getting his kicks was the risky behaviour rather than the sexual element of it all.
He could’ve saved us all from a lot of anxiety and just shoplifted some booze like Richard Madely
IMO the difference between those situations is it is not the parent's story to tell, it is their (adult) child's.
I'm curious to know what about that situation would make it OK for them to profit off giving an interview against their own child's wishes.As you say that’s your opinion, it’s not mine. As I said I don’t know enough about them to make that judgement.
Yes but their child is (allegedly) a drug addict and they are quite clearly terrified he's going to die. Whilst it may not be the way I'd go about things, I'm not going to condem them for trying to save their child's life. They must be desperate. Perhaps they've decided estranged is better than dead. At least that has hope.IMO the difference between those situations is it is not the parent's story to tell, it is their (adult) child's.
"That little witch "
I would say IMO it's not really for the parents to profit off this whole sorry situation, is it.
It's not their decision. It's their child's.So the parent’s experience in trying to do the best for their crack-addicted child in the face of a disinterested BBC isn’t their “story to tell”? What a bizarre stance to take.
It's the payment that makes it icky. In my opinion.Yes but their child is (allegedly) a drug addict and they are quite clearly terrified he's going to die. Whilst it may not be the way I'd go about things, I'm not going to condem them for trying to save their child's life. They must be desperate. Perhaps they've decided estranged is better than dead. At least that has hope.
Yeah, but I bet this time last week you'd never have thought you'd be staring at HE's bare arse, either?I know stranger things have happened but I really don’t think HE would spend his time sat on Tattle responding to posts when his whole life and career has just gone to tit
I'm curious to know what about that situation would make it OK for them to profit off giving an interview against their own child's wishes.
I make this comment with respect.It's not their decision. It's their child's.
When I was in my late teens (but an adult), I was assaulted by my then-boyfriend. For a whole host of reasons I did not want to take it to the police. One of my parents did it on my behalf - I didn't want them to. It caused a rift between us that persists to this day. It was my life. My decision to make. My story to tell. Not theirs. Whatever their intentions were.
---
It's the payment that makes it icky. In my opinion.
I also have a close relative who is an addict and I know from experience how bleeping damaging and wounding it is to your relationship when you try to "save" them. They have to actually want the help. Force it and it only gets worse and worse.I had this. But to the GP. And it still causes the same rift. I will never, ever forget that day.
It is never okay to tell someone else’s story.
It's not their decision. It's their child's.
I never said that it was. But I feel entitled to have my opinion on this subject, as everyone else on this thread does too. It doesn't make me an abuse apologist.I make this comment with respect.
Then you are projecting your thoughts and feelings onto this situation (as we all do).
For every person who felt like you, there will a similar number who felt relieved that someone went into battle for them. Not everyone's experience is the same.
I don’t know the relationship they had with their child before he was on drugs to say what is likely. Or if he was ‘encouraged’ to tell the press it was all rubbish.Personally I’m not baying for blood. My concern is that their child has refuted the parents’ claims twice, and now the Sun/TalkTV are quite possibly taking advantage of an emotive situation.
It’s not likely to end well if parents go against their adult child’s explicit instructions, especially if that child is - as the parents say - a drug addict.