Harry & Meghan #53 Ginge & Cringe have no shame, manipulating the public using Diana’s name

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
kev1974 said:
Some of these later speakers at the Biden Show this afternoon are really reminding me of the crazed bishop that Smegs had lecturing at the wedding.

I am wondering now if she saw that wedding as her Inauguration? Hence the bishop's "colourful" sermon?
Click to expand...
As a merkin, I stopped watching today. I’m a 1st gen immigrant to ‘ murka. And I have no time for amateur dramatics when it comes to running the damned country well.
wedding, 2018? I just kept watching during the wedding as the shots of TQ, K, C, Chuck, Eug/bea, Zara etc was unprecedented.... and I was a big supporter of megsy.... until the wedding. Something just smelled funny [insert photo of Elton at said wedding... cringeing massively]
I don’t need Lady gaga or J lo ...
 
cosmo girl said:
If you google Tourre Bakahai it brings up other forums/threads discussing what we do on here also loving his tweets. Did Aunty support Arsenal? :unsure: 🤣 #i love you tourre on Tumblr
Click to expand...
Yes he's quite the man of mystery isn't he? I found a few posts last night of people asking if anyone knew who he was, but nobody has any answers. I don't think it is Aunty now that Margot has reminded me of his particular style of writing. Tourre's pre-Meghan stuff is, as his bio suggests, mainly about Palestine and Arsenal. I like to think he's lurking here and loving our debates. Hi Tourre, come take a seat at Tattle Towers! 👋
 
kev1974 said:
There's been a lot of money spent on lawyers for this! The judge can't just write "Full Trial, witch!" five minutes later! It needs to look like they got something for all their legal fees!
Click to expand...
The judges take their role very seriously.... even if the case is a bleeping circus (wagatha, this case, etc) because they are held to account (something Hazno has never ever even had to understand, and megsy has ignore her whole life). They write a decision super carefully. And I Mean super carefully. Which is correct and a good thing.
we need to relax, beg Antinoos to come back into our warm, gentle fold, and see how this chapter of the madness unfolds.
in the meantime, we have Tom Cruise as Biden, Ginger Jim Carey as Hazno, .... Tom Hardy in a mask somewhere (my trailer please), and Hans zimmer with the music. Any suggestions for the missing characters?
 
ResidentMerkin said:
The judges take their role very seriously.... even if the case is a bleeping circus (wagatha, this case, etc) because they are held to account (something Hazno has never ever even had to understand, and megsy has ignore her whole life). They write a decision super carefully. And I Mean super carefully. Which is correct and a good thing.
we need to relax, beg Antinoos to come back into our warm, gentle fold, and see how this chapter of the madness unfolds.
in the meantime, we have Tom Cruise as Biden, Ginger Jim Carey as Hazno, .... Tom Hardy in a mask somewhere (my trailer please), and Hans zimmer with the music. Any suggestions for the missing characters?
Click to expand...
Wednesday Addams as Markle, the original series. 1964-1966. very creepy scary evil child.
 
I'm shocked she's not tried to muscle in on the inauguration. Maybe she'll supply some sandwiches to the clean up squad overnight.
Or some of her famous banana bread.

OK, back to their making comedy programs as light relief from legal shenanigans.

XWybXfj.png


9yeP2Jw.png



 
Currently chatting with my other half and I can't remember the facts about their titles and who can or can't take them away etc (I know something about an Act of Parliament being mentioned but can't for the life of me remember grr)

Could some infinitely kind soul please give me an explanation of this? I'll be eternally grateful and such!
 
chaos said:
Currently chatting with my other half and I can't remember the facts about their titles and who can or can't take them away etc (I know something about an Act of Parliament being mentioned but can't for the life of me remember grr)

Could some infinitely kind soul please give me an explanation of this? I'll be eternally grateful and such!
Click to expand...

Um... something something Title Deprivation Act of 1917 plus Act of Parliament with Royal Assent = JustHarry & JustMeggy... maybe?

I think Parliament would do a thing, take it to the queen and she would say yes or no. I'm not sure why royal assent would be needed but all the places where I looked seemed to say it would come into play in this. Considering that this was done to peers who committed actual treason and not to people who were just jerks, it seems a little heavy-handed from here, but I'm not paying taxes in the UK so you guys do what you need to do.

PS I'm not a barrister and I don't play one on TV
 
ResidentMerkin said:
The judges take their role very seriously.... even if the case is a bleeping circus (wagatha, this case, etc) because they are held to account (something Hazno has never ever even had to understand, and megsy has ignore her whole life). They write a decision super carefully. And I Mean super carefully. Which is correct and a good thing.
we need to relax, beg Antinoos to come back into our warm, gentle fold, and see how this chapter of the madness unfolds.
in the meantime, we have Tom Cruise as Biden, Ginger Jim Carey as Hazno, .... Tom Hardy in a mask somewhere (my trailer please), and Hans zimmer with the music. Any suggestions for the missing characters?
Click to expand...

May I suggest swapping Jim Carey with Coco the Clown! It’s all about optics and the clown is more believable.

If Scabies is involved then I nominate his part to be portrayed by Morph!
 
Baguette said:
BP know exactly what they are doing and there's some sort of understanding with ANL, I'd say.

ma still kind of shocked that the Letter was supposed to be published in full in Finding Freedom, as a juicy exclusive for Omid.

So here we have Palace staff actually involved in writing a letter that was going to be a chapter in that trashy book, which was also being 'fact checked' by KP's Sara Latham and the interviews set up by Sunshine Sachs' Keleigh Thomas Morgan. We don't actually know (yet) whether Keleigh billed Travalyst for her time, but she's going to have billed someone and if this goes to trial, that's 100% going to be disclosed.... We paid for a fair chunk of that book to be written - it really is an outrage.

ANL are presenting their defence on the copyright issues.

Click to expand...

Tried to do a bib, but it's not working.
That is the thing, the letter was supposed to be Omid and Caro's big surprise.

Baguette said:
BP know exactly what they are doing and there's some sort of understanding with ANL, I'd say.

ma still kind of shocked that the Letter was supposed to be published in full in Finding Freedom, as a juicy exclusive for Omid.

So here we have Palace staff actually involved in writing a letter that was going to be a chapter in that trashy book, which was also being 'fact checked' by KP's Sara Latham and the interviews set up by Sunshine Sachs' Keleigh Thomas Morgan. We don't actually know (yet) whether Keleigh billed Travalyst for her time, but she's going to have billed someone and if this goes to trial, that's 100% going to be disclosed.... We paid for a fair chunk of that book to be written - it really is an outrage.

ANL are presenting their defence on the copyright issues.

Click to expand...

Tried to do a bib, but it's not working.
That is the thing, the letter was supposed to be Omid and Caro's big surprise.
 
@50sGirl So so sorry to hear of your loss. My thoughts are with you and your family. (((hugs))).


liar liar said:
This woman and her familiar are litigation hounds - I think that is how they intend to make money to be honest. Neither of them has the abilities to run some media-influencing empire or come up with anything in the way of narratives which is why they are asking for suggestions which if used they will own outright in perpetuity.
Click to expand...

As I understand it, in the celebrity world, as soon as a media outlet puts out something they shouldn’t, then the celeb pays a lawyer something like £500 to write a letter saying they are commencing legal action.
The media outlet sometimes holds it hands up straight away, and says ‘sorry, we were wrong, here’s some money as an apology.’ Or agrees some positive publicity instead. (Say someone like the beckhams, for instance, which could explain all the positive PR they get)

Some of meagain’s friends have done this often - it might be the Clooneys, not sure.
This ensures a pay day.

(Actually I reckon some of Meagain’s friends probably bragged to her over dinner about doing this and exaggerated somewhat, telling her this was the way to get the press to like you and write nice things about you)
so she went ahead and tried to do this.


Meagain was probably thinking ‘let’s make some easy cash with a pay day’ and threatens legal.
but ANL said fine, go ahead, sue us!
Meagain doesn’t know what to do; that is not the response she’s been told her friends get.
It might also explain why some of those friends have distance themselves from her.
Meagain pursues the legal case as she keeps thinking ANL will back down, after all her friends told her they will. But her friends probably weren’t telling so many lies about themselves.

In response ANL are going to see this to the bitter end. Meagain doesn’t know what to do. As someone else said here, she is waiting for a script writer from suits to turn up and give her a happy ending... not going to happen. 😂😂😂
 
TheShire said:
A few months ago I was really interested in the court case, lots were talking about it.

Now in 2021 next to no body cares and I'm finding the legal stuff dull as dishwater.

Come 2022 I think they'll both be irrelevant faded outcasts.
Click to expand...

Your words in Gods ears! The earlier, the better!

Just_me1954 said:


View attachment 394430 q
Click to expand...


Interesting reference to being a crack addict.

Crack smoking shows fast, so not very likely. Cocaine use very more likely. Would tie in nicely with her illusions of grandeur, low attention span and what we've heard about bombarding staff at 5 o'clock in the morning with work demands.
cosmo girl said:
[

If you google Tourre Bakahai it brings up other forums/threads discussing what we do on here also loving his tweets. Did Aunty support Arsenal? :unsure: 🤣 #i love you tourre on Tumblr
Click to expand...

Here is another hint. He doesn't seem to know where to find the court papers. Otherwise I'd think he would have backed up his arguement with the solid evidence of TMsr affidavit. Makes me think he is no law professional.




Maybe someone being on Twitter could point him in the right direction.
 
Margo_Channing said:
Can anyone tell me what's going on with this law suit, I don't understand any of this legal jargon 😅😅🤦🏻‍♀️
Click to expand...

For Smeggie they said we don’t need a trial as ANL are guilty as duck so you! Mr judge, should award us victory and all the spoils!

For ANL not so fast fuckers. You are slippery with the truth and there is enough evidence that it all should be tested in a clown show of epic proportions!

The judge will let us know what he think and decides in a few weeks!

Hope that helps :m
 
Apologies if anyone earlier has explained this, but why isn’t she suing People magazine - didn’t they print this all too? Or is it the free speech defence
In the US?

Her lawyers haven’t really explained that ANL can’t lose at the moment because whatever happens in court they have the exclusive and it will sell more papers, more clicks whatever. She is really dumb to think that her brand new title gives her any protection from them. W&C suing for the topless pap shots is close but she seems to have learned that drones exist and to keep some clothes on when on holiday.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top