Harry & Meghan #53 Ginge & Cringe have no shame, manipulating the public using Diana’s name

[ResidentMerkin]

Magnifico - o - o - o - o --

That's what she did re the USA law that allows Thomas to share his letter with the media. She was asked basically "Are you aware of that law?" and she just dug her heels in until eventually legally forced to respond by the MOS legal team ... and then her response was "I can't say I am aware of it and can't say I'm not" (or WTTE). She tries to wibble with words to avoid answering questions directly or honestly. She thinks she's still on Suits and the script writers will cover her ass in the next scene. Stupid witch.

a judge - upon hearing this - would describe it as being "economic with the truth" which is tantamount to lying, I believe. UK judges DO NOT LIKE THIS. They want "Yes" or "no" answers. Those are answers. "on the vening of 23 september at 8.22 pm" - that is an answer. "I don't know." "I can't remember" "I can't really say" or "maybe" are not answers and pisses off judges.

So she’s completely denying any palace assistance in the letter writing, as per the claimant summary above, and now four palace assistants are prepared to give evidence? Oh dear...

If I read correctly it is even better than that. The drafts that were exchanged between Walter Smutty and the palace assistants (Knauf included) were via "electronic" communications (email) so there is a time stamped undeniable email thread that will sink her like a heavy, low-fibre turd.

 

[Baguette]

' The drafts that were exchanged between Walter Smutty and the palace assistants (Knauf included) were via "electronic" communications (email) so there is a time stamped undeniable email thread that will sink her like a heavy, low-fibre turd. '



Genius

 

[ResidentMerkin]

Those 4 members of staff at Buckland Palace won't have just decided to scupper Markle's case. I'm sure that BP has authorised their offer to give evidence. This suggests two possible reasons for BP's agreement. 1 HMTQ is using this as a carrot to force Markle to drop the case. 2 HMTQ has decided to throw Markle, not only under the bus but to the wolves as well.
ETA I don't know if ANL have to agree to Markle dropping the case. I'm sure that she tried to drop it before but ANL refused.

I do seem to remember Markle offering to drop the case (on condition of a mega cheque, presumably) and ANL said "NFW" (tit eating grin). I will search for the snippets on that but I seem to remember it was after she was ordered to pay for all their costs for when she challenged them being allowed to include the FF-joke book as evidence. Am I right? Just checking if I need to up my fish oils

 

[Baguette]

Her lawyer Ian Mill today told the High Court said any texts between Meghan and Knauf would have been deleted after 30 days.

This led Adrian Speck, for Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL), to claim the paper may have published sections of the letter Meghan did not have "full copyright over".

He added: “She may have a revised copyright which may be specific to a particular paragraph. [If] Mr Knauf sent another one back with further changes, you would need to know what has come in term of actual text from those two individuals.”

But Mr Mill branded the suggestion a "farce" and said the final draft of the letter is the only one still to exist because it was made on Meghan's iPhone.

Meg texts to aide that could reveal truth about letter to dad have been deleted

MEGHAN Markle’s texts to a royal aide that could reveal the truth about her “painful” letter to her dad have been deleted, her lawyer admitted today. The Duchess of Sussex, 39, is…

www.thesun.co.uk

 

[LadyMuck]

Megz team are getting snarky now





Early to mid-Feb for the Judgment.

Thanks for all this Baguette. Why the delay til mid February?

 

[liar liar]

I do seem to remember Markle offering to drop the case (on condition of a mega cheque, presumably) and ANL said "NFW" (tit eating grin). I will search for the snippets on that but I seem to remember it was after she was ordered to pay for all their costs for when she challenged them being allowed to include the FF-joke book as evidence. Am I right? Just checking if I need to up my fish oils

She's shot herself in the foot so many times I'm surprised she isn't confined to a wheel chair.

 

[kev1974]

Some of these later speakers at the Biden Show this afternoon are really reminding me of the crazed bishop that Smegs had lecturing at the wedding.

I am wondering now if she saw that wedding as her Inauguration? Hence the bishop's "colourful" sermon?

 

[liar liar]

Some of these later speakers at the Biden Show this afternoon are really reminding me of the crazed bishop that Smegs had lecturing at the wedding.

I am wondering now if she saw that wedding as her Inauguration? Hence the bishop's "colourful" sermon?

I thought that and am now watching the kids cake program.

 

[kev1974]

Thanks for all this Baguette. Why the delay til mid February?

There's been a lot of money spent on lawyers for this! The judge can't just write "Full Trial, witch!" five minutes later! It needs to look like they got something for all their legal fees!

 

[Baguette]

Thanks for all this Baguette. Why the delay til mid February?

Think it's pretty normal to spend a good few working days writing a judgment. Has to be done carefully.

 

[ResidentMerkin]

Haven't seen Markle at the Biden Inauguration yet, so tell me she's not there! I really hope not.

I have this image of her, in a private jet, or a helicopter with Aviator Prince Bozzo at the wheel, preparing a HiLo jump to land on stage next to Kamala. or in a Catapult from the Watergate Building, Prince Bozzo ranking the catapult back and her screaming "Do you have the right coordinates, you muppet!!?" and Bozzo genuflacting pathetically "yes, darling, no darling" as the spring finds its max tension... and BOING - Megzy hits terminal velocity and smacks, Tom and Jerry style, into the dome of the Capitol. CNN and Fox camera-persons (let's keep it PC) start screaming "its an attack! assasination attempt!!" and TQ gets a call from thee HOme Office saying "Your majesty. We have another issue wiith Harry to sweep up."

 

[liar liar]

I have this image of her, in a private jet, or a helicopter with Aviator Prince Bozzo at the wheel, preparing a HiLo jump to land on stage next to Kamala. or in a Catapult from the Watergate Building, Prince Bozzo ranking the catapult back and her screaming "Do you have the right coordinates, you muppet!!?" and Bozzo genuflacting pathetically "yes, darling, no darling" as the spring finds its max tension... and BOING - Megzy hits terminal velocity and smacks, Tom and Jerry style, into the dome of the Capitol. CNN and Fox camera-persons (let's keep it PC) start screaming "its an attack! assasination attempt!!" and TQ gets a call from thee HOme Office saying "Your majesty. We have another issue wiith Harry to sweep up."

When your film script gets accepted can you offer Tattlers preferential screening please Word of warning: don't use Tom Cruise - he's getting rather wrinkly now.

 

[ResidentMerkin]

me first me first!! https://tenor.com/view/im-first-kasing-raymond-tsang-excel-excel-esports-gif-18016731
although you're probably right - doubt that is his real photo. Are we sure it is even a "he"?

ok, y'all. for Realz. Who is going to send a DM to Tourre inviting him/her to our sleepover? Just say our ghost stories are FOR REAL, involving a phantom baby, ghost writers, vampire prostitutes and biig giant borrowed castles

 

[liar liar]

ok, y'all. for Realz. Who is going to send a DM to Tourre inviting him/her to our sleepover? Just say our ghost stories are FOR REAL, involving a phantom baby, ghost writers, vampire prostitutes and biig giant borrowed castles

I think that was all covered in the latest 'I'm a Celeb Get me out of Here' filmed in a castle in Wales.

 

[Palpatine]

Megz team are getting snarky now





Early to mid-Feb for the Judgment.

What? It’s ridiculous how long the legal process takes in these matters!

 

[Vanelope]

Her lawyer Ian Mill today told the High Court said any texts between Meghan and Knauf would have been deleted after 30 days.

This led Adrian Speck, for Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL), to claim the paper may have published sections of the letter Meghan did not have "full copyright over".

He added: “She may have a revised copyright which may be specific to a particular paragraph. [If] Mr Knauf sent another one back with further changes, you would need to know what has come in term of actual text from those two individuals.”

But Mr Mill branded the suggestion a "farce" and said the final draft of the letter is the only one still to exist because it was made on Meghan's iPhone.

Meg texts to aide that could reveal truth about letter to dad have been deleted

MEGHAN Markle’s texts to a royal aide that could reveal the truth about her “painful” letter to her dad have been deleted, her lawyer admitted today. The Duchess of Sussex, 39, is…

www.thesun.co.uk

She may have deleted her copy of the conversation.... but.... DID HE?! I would have kept a copy of anything to make sure I didn’t get the tit for it.

 

[Poppea]

ok, y'all. for Realz. Who is going to send a DM to Tourre inviting him/her to our sleepover? Just say our ghost stories are FOR REAL, involving a phantom baby, ghost writers, vampire prostitutes and biig giant borrowed castles

Far to long winded.

Just let him know we will all wear our naughty nighty

And if this does not work, I might dust off the strap on. But just once!

She may have deleted her copy of the conversation.... but.... DID HE?! I would have kept a copy of anything to make sure I didn’t get the tit for it.

Maybe they could ask for the Secret Services copy Just sayin'!

 

[ResidentMerkin]

Her lawyer Ian Mill today told the High Court said any texts between Meghan and Knauf would have been deleted after 30 days.

This led Adrian Speck, for Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL), to claim the paper may have published sections of the letter Meghan did not have "full copyright over".

He added: “She may have a revised copyright which may be specific to a particular paragraph. [If] Mr Knauf sent another one back with further changes, you would need to know what has come in term of actual text from those two individuals.”

But Mr Mill branded the suggestion a "farce" and said the final draft of the letter is the only one still to exist because it was made on Meghan's iPhone.

Meg texts to aide that could reveal truth about letter to dad have been deleted

MEGHAN Markle’s texts to a royal aide that could reveal the truth about her “painful” letter to her dad have been deleted, her lawyer admitted today. The Duchess of Sussex, 39, is…

www.thesun.co.uk

OMG Ian. You moron. that is an OUTRIGHT LIE. all emails can be recovered. all of them. and if you work in certain sectors (finance, law, government - and yes that would include the Palace), you are required by law to have all of your electronic communications saved in a place to be accesssed for 7 years. Oh nelly. this is going to blow harder than Smeggy after 2 rusty trombones

 

[liar liar]

OMG Ian. You moron. that is an OUTRIGHT LIE. all emails can be recovered. all of them. and if you work in certain sectors (finance, law, government - and yes that would include the Palace), you are required by law to have all of your electronic communications saved in a place to be accesssed for 7 years. Oh nelly. this is going to blow harder than Smeggy after 2 rusty trombones

I am liking that news Merkin <dances around the kitchen with the cat>

 

[Nannyto2]

Not sure if this correct but a teccy relative of mine says anything done on the www is there for ever especially emails that hang around on the server
And although it might take time can be found
Even mobile phone messages can be tracked
If not the message itself the time date who to and from
Unless it’s a non contract SIM card phone
Bet that’s what she had hidden in her moon bump

Not sure if this correct but a teccy relative of mine says anything done on the www is there for ever especially emails that hang around on the server
And although it might take time can be found
Even mobile phone messages can be tracked
If not the message itself the time date who to and from
Unless it’s a non contract SIM card phone
Bet that’s what she had hidden in her moon bump

Sorry missed you post RM
You clarified what I just wrote