Harry & Meghan #53 Ginge & Cringe have no shame, manipulating the public using Diana’s name

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I'm baffled and yet intrigued by this.

Ty3io5O.png


16.1. There were several draughts of the letter....
I've believed this from the get-go. It stands to reason that one doesn't just sit down and bang out an important missive without tweaking it, erasing things, adding things, choosing a more suitable word here or there. Today proved it for me when megamouth's team said she ended the letter with some hippy-dippy wokey guff about " "If you love me, as you tell the press you do, please stop. Please allow us to live our lives in peace.I ask for nothing other than peace. And I wish the same for you.” Yet the MOS/Thomas version ended with something rather more robust. I forget what it was and I might be misremembering but I thought it was a bit more "duck off".
Maybe the version released to the lawyers was sanitised somewhat, while the one sent was more harsh.

Anyway the sugars are creaming their panties claiming "We knowed it !!!! Dose cuntz a' da Buck palace leeked da leter 2 da pres"
Not sure how they came to that conclusion. Time will tell.
***************************************************************************
Our resident Murican mentioned megatwats see through skirt, which I had never seen. So I googled it.
Holy duck :eek:. Luckily she was wearing her Bridget Jones big pants that day.




Bridget Jones big pants. LOL!!!! Hilarious!!! Great find -- and great analysis. Also thank you for hleping our resident sugar understand the concept of "public nudity" by his/her kween. This asn't a skirt - this was a blue veil merching her Spanx. Funny how she seems to actually be wearing not one but TWO pairs of spanx. A black pair over a light beige biker short pair. I will not comment on the irony of that colour combo - but it certainly made it super easy to see through the blue gauze

I see from the court documents that she still hasn’t disclosed her texts etc. Stalling until the outcome of the summary request.
The lawyers have got to be pulling her up on this. it is a breach of a direct order by the judge.
I do know that lawyers here (for some reason) are worried about looking petty, childish, snitchy if they point out errors of the opposing team (let's call them team A), just for the sake of pointing it out. However, Team B putting the "cmplaint" it in context of how it the Team A's breach is compromising Team B's ability to do their work properly,.... that is allowed. Apparently, otherwise is suggests that Team B is calling the judge out for not doing his / her job.

This GIF :ROFLMAO: No way did she ever have any intention of fulfilling public duties. I've never known a person whose micro-expressions say so much.


OMG can you imagine having and audience with her and knowing that she was a passive aggressive Walter Mitty phoney, you start talking total incoherent nonsense... or better yet, start rattling off some really fabulous cringe quotes
and we bring our OWN cameras and capture every hilarious micro-expression

She could have said 'my half sister'...


This is bleeping brilliant!
fantastic.... although perhaps "at the Soho, Soho Banana" might really set up our megsy's CV in all iits full fruity delight

Gosh, she really doesn't need to dress up for Halloween does she!!
Ah the famous "magical boobs" https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/56602...rince-harry-magical-boobs-hollywood-rejected/
 
Last edited:
Or there's a third option. That she's just washed her hands of the pair of them, she's been approached to consent to staff providing evidence in this case and she's treated it like any other one where she has no skin in the game, and just cooperated with the process of law.
I don't think the HMTQ is that naive, she'll know that her staff giving evidence is tantamount to opening the floodgates on Markle's previous antics.
 
I don't think the HMTQ is that naive, she'll know that her staff giving evidence is tantamount to opening the floodgates on Markle's previous antics.

BP know exactly what they are doing and there's some sort of understanding with ANL, I'd say.

I'm still kind of shocked that the Letter was supposed to be published in full in Finding Freedom, as a juicy exclusive for Omid.

So here we have Palace staff actually involved in writing a letter that was going to be a chapter in that trashy book, which was also being 'fact checked' by KP's Sara Latham and the interviews set up by Sunshine Sachs' Keleigh Thomas Morgan. We don't actually know (yet) whether Keleigh billed Travalyst for her time, but she's going to have billed someone and if this goes to trial, that's 100% going to be disclosed.... We paid for a fair chunk of that book to be written - it really is an outrage.

ANL are presenting their defence on the copyright issues.

 
I have a funny feeling that this is all going to go very quietly away.............. I can't see the RF allowing the tit show of her and her father turning up in court. It will be settled - and the terms of that not released publicly, so of course, Smeggy will crow victory.

If only the media would unite and put a complete blackout on her and Harry.
The Royals will not touch it other than when employees are required to give evidence. It is smeggy's problem. They have no dog in this fight and are too experienced in these matters to stick their noses in.
They will be like ourselves, nebbing from a distance and eating popcorn.
 
As far as I remember, rumours are that Megzy has tried to settle with ANL but they refused. We don't know the details but at the time it seemed like she wanted them to pay her to drop the case. No dice.

Wise people on here at the time (**waves**) thought this case started with the idea that the ANL would immediately hand over a nice fat cheque and an apology. Oops.
That's often what happens and yes, it's 100% what smeggy assumed would happen.:m Unfortunately for her this case drags too many others into her mess. Her father, the Royals, her mates, People magazine, the MOS. She needs her arse smacked hard legally to let her know she cannot flounce around manipulating swathes of people and using them to shore up her imaginary saintly image.
She's throwing everything at this because she's shitting bricks and she knows that this is the hill she will potentially die on reputation and friend wise. Even were she to win this case(unlikely as it seems) those friends she dragged into it will not easily forget the full year and more of hell that defending her dubious honour has cost them. Her circle of friends willing to put their heads on the block for her has shrunk massively and she's become a pariah in hollyweird I should think. She's the stupid witch mate you avoid going out with because she picks fights with bar men and other girls over duck all and then expects you to back her up when the tit hits the fan. Still your mate but one you keep at a safe distance.
 
The Royals will not touch it other than when employees are required to give evidence. It is smeggy's problem. They have no dog in this fight and are too experienced in these matters to stick their noses in.
They will be like ourselves, nebbing from a distance and eating popcorn.
Yes I reckon so too. They've got nothing to lose, she was only here for 2 years, most of them on breaks of various sorts, and now she's OUT.

ETA I wish I liked popcorn
 


Interesting. Warby has already said something along the lines that Thomas Sr wasn't an important witness and could be deposed. He now seems to be indicating that there is no particular expectation that the Palace 4 will need to give evidence in person. He's not aiming for a circus this October.

ETA The fact that Warby is emphasising 'if appropriate', does that already show he is thinking about the trial and won't be granting a summary judgment....
 
I too am sorry for @50sGirl loss....

This thread is a thankful diversion at the moment.

So have I got this right, if the letter had been published in the USA then there wouldn't be any kind of copyright issue at all? Meghan is just trying to exploit English copyright law?

Its a stupid case.......costing far far too much money surely...... revolving about a fit of pique from an ex American TV star, upset because her exclusive reveal of the letter in Finding Freedom was spoilt by her dad and the MOS publishing extracts instead!
Its not as if any state secrets were revealed or even anything important!
 
On the 9th screenshot, middle of the page, is that suggesting she's failed to respond to numerous requests for information? It says 19 requests were made, claimant only responded to 4 of them.
That's what she did re the USA law that allows Thomas to share his letter with the media. She was asked basically "Are you aware of that law?" and she just dug her heels in until eventually legally forced to respond by the MOS legal team ... and then her response was "I can't say I am aware of it and can't say I'm not" (or WTTE). She tries to wibble with words to avoid answering questions directly or honestly. She thinks she's still on Suits and the script writers will cover her ass in the next scene. Stupid witch.


x4QWhsQ.gif
 
So she’s completely denying any palace assistance in the letter writing, as per the claimant summary above, and now four palace assistants are prepared to give evidence? Oh dear... 🍿
Haven't seen Markle at the Biden Inauguration yet, so tell me she's not there! I really hope not.
No the trash men cleared her away with the rest of the :poop:
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top