Harry and Meghan #52 We’ll ask the question Meg won’t say - Thomas Markle, are you ok?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
I don't read the Express either but his take on things Royal are usually very nuanced, balanced, straightforward bordering on punchy. His is one of the few twiitter accounts I look at.
The Express are known for publishing total Royal drivel - look at some of their recent rubbish about Kate/Wills and their now deceased dog. Utter rubbish. All the Queen's corgis are dead although she may have one 'Dorgi' remaining but I thought that died recently too.
 
One could only dream...although can you imagine both of those egos together with their collective issues? He claimed to be god (lower case intended) at some point, and she, of course, is the Kween...🤦‍♀️
Jaysuhs.... imagine HRS (her rejected Smegness) Meghan skipping the queue from d-list porn actress to Douchess, then slaloming around princess, LordzaLeaping over Kween and landing a first-ever quadruple axel with moron twist past EMPRESS ... to..... wait for it..... GODDESS
 
you have Junior prom which is your junior year (16) and senior prom which is your senior year (17) - both usually take place in the late spring. What is weird is that all the girls seem to be wearing identical dark dresses and she is standing out (like she did for Louis' baptism where she wore the goose tit green dress when everyone else had gotten the memo and wore blue and/or cream) in her full-length, all virginous white. and there are 3 events with 3 different dresses including the one with the long white gloves.

If it was a debutant ball/cotillon, that would be Decembbeer of her Freshman year at college, all the girls would be wearing white and she would be photographed with her dad
When that image was posted ages ago I said it was quite clearly a wedding image. Legal wedding? Maybe not, but unless she was fronting for an all girl group there would be absolutely no other logical reason for her wearing all white while all the other girls around her were were wearing purple dresses in exactly the same shiny fire hazard fabric. I'm convinced she had a wedding of some sort. She's cocky and was spoiled enough to have secretly arranged a wedding which, when discovered, was promptly dealt with via annulment or whatever to protect her future prospects.
There is simply no other explanation for that image. No girls would ever EVER agree to get their prom dresses made in the same fabric and then allow themselves to be pictured playing second fiddle to a witch in a fancy white dress. Does not compute.
 
US Weekly fantasy PR from the Harkles. This one is themed 'Harry v William'


LOL at the idea the Cambridges will travel to pay homage to King and Kween Harkle at Chateau MortgageCito

The insider added that William and Harry “are looking forward to spending time together in person the moment it’s safe to travel,” noting they will likely reunite in England. “But at some point in 2021, the Cambridges will travel to Santa Barbara and see the Sussexes on their new home turf.”

This smacks of Hazza and Megs. They are putting it out there that W&K will travel to the USA for and visit and, if they don’t go, it will be spun that W&K are petulant and bear grudges.
 
When that image was posted ages ago I said it was quite clearly a wedding image. Legal wedding? Maybe not, but unless she was fronting for an all girl group there would be absolutely no other logical reason for her wearing all white while all the other girls around her were were wearing purple dresses in exactly the same shiny fire hazard fabric. I'm convinced she had a wedding of some sort. She's cocky and was spoiled enough to have secretly arranged a wedding which, when discovered, was promptly dealt with via annulment or whatever to protect her future prospects.
There is simply no ther explanation for that image. No girls would ever EVER agree to get their prom dresses made in the same fabric and then allow themselves to be pictured playing second fiddle to a witch in a fancy white dress. Does not compute.

Could possibly have been a part in a school play or school fashion shoot or something like that, to be fair.

But definitely not a prom.
 
This smacks of Hazza and Megs. They are putting it out there that W&K will travel to the USA for and visit and, if they don’t go, it will be spun that W&K are petulant and bear grudges.
And risk organised pap pics and endless puff about how close the cousins and brothers are and how much they enjoyed themselves, while MM is merching her clothes.

Not a chance W & C will risk their kids for that.
 
RF have said the Harkles are Out and pointedly listed the Magnificent Seven senior royals supporting TQ. That's the public face of the RF gong forward.

We've been wondering what on earth is going in Harry's top-secret Diana book (and inevitable tie-in Netflix documentary series). Suddenly we have this story coming from nowhere, which completely ignores William's support for HIV/AIDs but bigs up Hazza (currently lolling around on a sofa in Montecito trying to learn his next Spotify script). Is this the start of the PR push for Harry to claim Diana's work as his own?


Prince Harry remains passionate and committed to the issue of HIV/AIDs despite stepping down as a senior member of the Royal Family, a charity boss has said.

Ian Green, the Chief Executive of leading HIV and sexual health charity Terrence Higgins Trust, spoke to The Mirror last month about the continued impact of the late Princess Diana’s work in fighting HIV/AIDS through her son Prince Harry.

Green said: “I was privileged to meet the Princess a couple of times, not in relation to Terrence Higgins Trust, but other charities. "And what I noticed about her was how genuine she was, how that she would pin people in authority to making commitments but in a really disarming way. And I certainly see that within Prince Harry as well.”
 
There is no way whatsoever that the future king and his queen consort would travel to Santa Barbara. How are any publications allowed to print this total made-up rubbish?
Agree 100% what a joke and I bet more likely things deteriorating. W & C must be livid how Diana's been portrayed in the crown as a bedhopping bulimic tart by Haznos new employer netflix, let alone HMTQ, C and Camilla, Not a word of protest from Hazzno. Now pic with Hazno on Di's head after him whingeing that first his mother then MM were being commoditised! What happened to "every click, every camera flash" (sob for Goldman Sachs audience) and just leaving her be? its been 23 years! H&M will jump on any bandwagon for $$$, son, mother, mental health sufferers, BLM, disenfranchised penguins, climate change, hessian lattes - you name it.

Re Hazno writing a self-help book on mental health as a possibility as someone suggested, surely no responsible publisher would touch it? It would need a very heavy disclaimer on the cover! Mental health is a serious issue which should only be dealt with by qualified professionals but MM and Hazzno have almost trivialized and commercialised it by linking it to all their so called charities which to me are highly suspect. Hazzno urges listeners to click and follow and they then can sell your data!

Feed me, Hazno.
Dear heavens is that what i think it is? A VFL ...?
 
pseuds.jpg

Hazno has finally made it!
A mention on Private Eye pseuds corner 😁
 
The 'secret' Harry book is about Diana and my guess is it's about her legacy. It's not a self-help book - not this year anyway.

Another month, another lawsuit. More detail on Harry v The Mail on Sunday (ignoring Lord Dannatt's letter and ditching his military roles by flouncing off to Canada/California)

Prince Harry's lawyers say the "barely researched and one-sided article," caused forces personnel to doubt his commitment.
Their filing goes as far as claiming the military community will be "more susceptible to suicide" because of the impact on his own ability to promote mental health services.



ETA Their main complaint seems to be that they weren't given enough time to comment on the story. :ROFLMAO: 🤪 Thought they refused to engage with the Evil British Press these days...
 
Last edited:
The 'secret' Harry book is about Diana and my guess is it's about her legacy. It's not a self-help book - not this year anyway.

Another month, another lawsuit. More detail on Harry v The Mail on Sunday (ignoring Lord Dannatt's letter and ditching his military roles by flouncing off to Canada/California)

Prince Harry's lawyers say the "barely researched and one-sided article," caused forces personnel to doubt his commitment.
Their filing goes as far as claiming the military community will be "more susceptible to suicide" because of the impact on his own ability to promote mental health services.


This is so cheap. Suicide is not something which should be used to score points.
 
Prince Harry's lawyers say the "barely researched and one-sided article," caused forces personnel to doubt his commitment.
Their filing goes as far as claiming the military community will be "more susceptible to suicide" because of the impact on his own ability to promote mental health services.


🙄 he certainly has a very inflated idea of his own importance doesn't he? twit

I didn't know that he had a 24 hour helpline available for them. What is he the military agony aunt 🙄

I thought the Dorgi named Candy was still alive. She is the last one.
I only noticed because I had a dachshund named Candy.

View attachment 375110 q
Is that @Pom Bear moonlighting with the Queen? 😃
 
Re Harry v the Mail....complaining/suing about the military article

a) How on earth has the military coped for all these hundreds of years without Harry and his input? I know ptsd etc can be horrendous...and does need more support....but is Harry the best person to do this?

And could someone please tell him....there are some things where you really need to put your money where your mouth is..

If this article was felt to be so unfair, wouldnt it be much more effective and powerful to show it was nonsense ....by illustrating some of the wonderful work that Harry was actually doing to support these military veterans! Throw a powerfully positive article, with a rival paper....talking about the great things that Harry is doing......
If there isnt anything factual to counteract the article.....how are you going to prove it was so inaccurate?
 
When that image was posted ages ago I said it was quite clearly a wedding image. Legal wedding? Maybe not, but unless she was fronting for an all girl group there would be absolutely no other logical reason for her wearing all white while all the other girls around her were were wearing purple dresses in exactly the same shiny fire hazard fabric. I'm convinced she had a wedding of some sort. She's cocky and was spoiled enough to have secretly arranged a wedding which, when discovered, was promptly dealt with via annulment or whatever to protect her future prospects.
There is simply no other explanation for that image. No girls would ever EVER agree to get their prom dresses made in the same fabric and then allow themselves to be pictured playing second fiddle to a witch in a fancy white dress. Does not compute.
No this is a Christmas themed event in approx December 1997 and she's wearing a back dress. It's a copyright case about pictures of markle that were put on the internet and then published by others. The apparent copyright holder, the photographer and his assistant, have taken out the case.
It's obviously not prom then or the homecoming one if I read right.
I can't attach the whol e filing as it's a pdf
And I don't know how to hide the image as some people do with spoiler or something.

RF have said the Harkles are Out and pointedly listed the Magnificent Seven senior royals supporting TQ. That's the public face of the RF gong forward.

We've been wondering what on earth is going in Harry's top-secret Diana book (and inevitable tie-in Netflix documentary serie


Prince Harry remains passionate and committed to the issue of HIV/AIDs despite stepping down as a senior member of the Royal Family, a charity boss has said.

Ian Green, the Chief Executive of leading HIV and sexual health charity Terrence Higgins Trust, spoke to The Mirror last month about the continued impact of the late Princess Diana’s work in fighting HIV/AIDS through her son Prince Harry.

Green said: “I was privileged to meet the Princess a couple of times, not in relation to Terrence Higgins Trust, but other charities. "And what I noticed about her was how genuine she was, how that she would pin people in authority to making commitments but in a really disarming way. And I certainly see that within Prince Harry as well.”
And I'm committed to losing weight but that's not working out well for me either!
The actual work involved is sorely lacking.

And that
Prince Harry's lawyers say the "barely researched and one-sided article," caused forces personnel to doubt his commitment.
Their filing goes as far as claiming the military community will be "more susceptible to suicide" because of the impact on his own ability to promote mental health services.


Seriously. his absence makes grown men despair? More susceptible to suicide my arse. If they're that despondent they need professional help not half-witted hacks who don't know the difference between catatonia and furry things caterwauling
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210106-182017.png
    Screenshot_20210106-182017.png
    90.6 KB · Views: 233
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top