Harry and Meghan #476 Taken up the Back Passage

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
thought that after his last stinker, sewer 🐀 Scrote had been markled & washed down the drain
-the plastic one is venturing out...
hope his next pile of :poop: gets flushed and swiftly..

1734880915181.png
 
Give the girl a break! She is still recovering and needs to rest.
She is probably working very hard in private doing meeting , zoom calls, etc.
I doubt she’s traumatised by a few nasty comments. She’s made of stronger stuff and if she can fight cancer she can cope with tne,.
I wouldn’t be surprised if William put his foot down and told her to rest.
I agree. That's exactly what's happening , I'll bet....😎❤️

It's,amazing how popular with the younger generation the Prince and Proncess of Wales are 😃😎


I won't have a word said about the hard work they all do. 7 say a week diaries, long into retirement. Our Monarch and The Queen are well into their 70s , and I didn't realise how much work the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh do ( among others) . I see them in a new light in recent years.
As for the Prince & Princess of Wales ; an absolute credit & future King & Queen. I hope to see the Crowning of them ( I will be dead when King George VII is Crowned).
---
He looks more rounded in the face doesn’t he .
He has been at the spuds, and the Custard Creams 😃😃😆😆😛
 
A bit of housekeeping required my forum lovelies. Just been looking to see what the next thread title will be, and we have two suggestions, each with 63 votes. So if you've not yet voted then you still have time. Here's the two in question.

View attachment 3329982 q

From the Office of @Thalia

Use @AmIbeingTreasonable 's suggestion because it makes more sense and I also had the last title 😙
 
We'll have to disagree here, no problem!
I can't give Chuck credit for being an honest man because he isn't one, as history has repeatedly shown. He is sly and treacherous so imo much of what he does is open to question.

He allows Catherine and her family to suffer now his mother has gone, which is not the hallmark of a man helping others with their health. Hypocritical. If he's extending his life with palliative care he's having a whale of a time using it to bury his brother, protect his dangerous son and deceive the public. Again not the hallmark of someone setting an example as Head of The Church of England.

We don't know if he's having palliative care, though they say he's going for weekly cancer treatments. We don't know anything and cannot trust what we are told.
One thing I do know is that we don't know the half of it, so for me the jury's still out.
I can't give Chuck credit for being an honest man because he isn't one, as history has repeatedly shown. He is sly and treacherous so imo much of what he does is open to question.

Totally agree.

And I also think that TLQ didn't abdicate in his favour because she knew that he was a vain, arrogant man who wouldn't listen to advisors and would just do what he wanted no matter what the repercussions for anyone else. Perhaps she hoped he would grow out of it, but he didn't. Just my opinion, FWIW.
 
I can't give Chuck credit for being an honest man because he isn't one, as history has repeatedly shown. He is sly and treacherous so imo much of what he does is open to question.

Totally agree.

And I also think that TLQ didn't abdicate in his favour because she knew that he was a vain, arrogant man who wouldn't listen to advisors and would just do what he wanted no matter what the repercussions for anyone else. Perhaps she hoped he would grow out of it, but he didn't. Just my opinion, FWIW.
She wouldn't have abdicated regardless, because she was old school and The Crown was her duty.
 
Well, Harold soon won’t be the only Prince in the USA , …..when he’s joined by Mandy, the Prince of Darkness !!!

and I’ll wager Mandelson won’t be daft or insulting enough to call the first amendment …” Bonkers “ !

( Mandelson , btw, is mates with Cholmondley - husband of Rose Hanbury - who was accused of having an affair with POW …
If only someone ‘high up’ knew who started that rumour !!!! 😉😉)
 
Was just watching an improv about Rishi Sunak's in-laws (not in the context of them being his in-laws - they've pissed us off enough on their own).

Some of the comments under the post made me realise how likes Smegs and Sparry they are. Her apparently mentioning in every speech that she gave her husband money to start/expand his business (I don't know exactly and CBA to find out). Him being very out of touch with real life and saying that we should all work 70-hours weeks.

One comment really touched me - that simplicity is what we can see and feel, and not what we are told about. This really applies to everything the Smarkles say, do and are. They keep telling us to think and speak a certain way about them that we can see isn't true (or it is, but they don't want us to acknowledge their flaws). And that's what this whole privacy and gagging social media and the press is all about.

Narcs being narcs.

The Smarkles really did the world a favour - we can now recognise and deal with narcs and other abusers more easily and accurately.
 
PA is allegedly sulking and won't walk The Queen's corgis. He might "flee" to a Saudi palace to escape the Chinese spy scandal. His behaviour has been savaged in the press.

Did you post here @Evangelina that the words "Pitch@Palace" we're added to something relating to H6, words that hadn't been in a document originally, which then linked it to PA? Three days ago, or am I mistaken? I can't find your post.
 
PA is allegedly sulking and won't walk The Queen's corgis. He might "flee" to a Saudi palace to escape the Chinese spy scandal. His behaviour has been savaged in the press.

Did you post here @Evangelina that the words "Pitch@Palace" we're added to something relating to H6, words that hadn't been in a document originally, which then linked it to PA? Three days ago, or am I mistaken? I can't find your post.
I heard that about him sulking.
The corgis are apparently delighted!
 
Their behaviour can be used as more proof of their paranoia - in the context of both mental illness and drug use.

They're always markling themselves. They've just not destroyed themselves completely because they're being saved time and again.
I thought it failed but it could be ongoing.
Personally I think she's wasting her time and should move on. Meghan was horrible to her and everyone knows it.
Imagine treating your disabled half sister so badly when you're wealthy and married to a Prince 🙄

The Markle family haven't always acted well themselves but if Meghan was a normal person and had forgiven her father for the silly photo shoot then none of them would have reason to retaliate. Tom Jnr has acted like a bit of an idiot but I can understand why, at least he cares about his father.

The Markle family should accept that none of them will ever hear from Meghan again and she wouldn't help them financially even if they were homeless and living on the street because Meghan has no heart.
tbh, I think Rachel orchestrated the Daddy Photoshoot Fail. She needed that to get Daddy off the wedding invite list. Her family sucks, sure. But the whole photo shoot was engineered by the Dishonest Duchess-to-be to keep the Markles away.
 
Just watching The Royal Beat on ITV, they are going to discuss THAT Christmas card in a few minutes ….. it will be interesting to see if ‘photoshopping‘ is mentioned!

ETA ….. nothing, zilch - only mentioned no children’s faces shown and it’s been ‘a while since we’ve seen them’! Not even a mention of it being blurred compared to the other pics.

This makes me sick when you think how Catherine was accused of photo-shopping her Mother’s Day photo and as a result was personally ripped apart and the photo cancelled by so many news outlets. It was deliberately turned into some sort of scandal and there was clearly an orchestrated campaign behind it.
 
PA is allegedly sulking and won't walk The Queen's corgis. He might "flee" to a Saudi palace to escape the Chinese spy scandal. His behaviour has been savaged in the press.

Did you post here @Evangelina that the words "Pitch@Palace" we're added to something relating to H6, words that hadn't been in a document originally, which then linked it to PA? Three days ago, or am I mistaken? I can't find your post.
Is this what you're looking for?

 
Is this what you're looking for?

Thank you yes it was.
According to @Evangelina 's post on Monday, the words "Pitch@Palace" were apparently added to modify a document but the words weren't originally there, if I'm not mistaken.
Who added them?
Which ties in with this Daily Mail article today.
Was this the document? Apols if I've got it wrong.
Didn't they report the other day that PA's documents had been "lost"?
How convenient. What a stitch-up.

"Pitch at Palace dossier is found at £1million secret HQ of Prince Andrew 'spook'
By MARK HOOKHAMPUBLISHED: 01:58 GMT, 22 December 2024 | UPDATED: 05:02 GMT, 22 December 2024

"A box full of books detailing the work of Prince Andrew’s business initiative in China was left dumped outside the £1 million property that served as a headquarters for alleged Chinese spy Yang Tengbo.
One of the books was a hard-backed collection of photographs showing Andrew meeting dozens of Chinese businessmen as part of his Dragons’ Den-style initiative, Pitch@Palace.
The first photograph in the 87-page dossier showed the Duke of York posing with suspected spook Yang, who has been banned from entering the UK on national security grounds.
The new owner of the suburban house – which the MoS last week revealed was used as a base by Yang’s firm – said he found the material when he moved in."

---
This makes me sick when you think how Catherine was accused of photo-shopping her Mother’s Day photo and as a result was personally ripped apart and the photo cancelled by so many news outlets. It was deliberately turned into some sort of scandal and there was clearly an orchestrated campaign behind it.
This is what I meant when I posted that the Waleses and their children are being attacked and not protected. Why should she shrug this off, and what if they can't shrug it off? She was ill, but was fair game and is still fair game. As future Queen and King they should be supported and be seen to be supported, not play cat-and-mouse games with them, dicking around with who's allowed to appear where wearing what.
This wouldn't be tolerated for 1 minute for Cam.
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top