Harry and Meghan #455 The Stoat was a senior w*nking royal

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Fredsnail said:
Why is he so worried about a knife or acid when they'd have to be close - more likely and easier to get shot from a distance.
Click to expand...

It’s for the British market …… mention a gun and someone might have the audacity to point out to him that there are more guns where he lives in America than in GB.
I reckon a pensioner with a pea shooter could hit him …. he would dramatically fall to the ground, clutching the spot where he was hit and, like a premier league footballer, roll over a few times for the full effect. Best stay in the USA Hazno where you feel safe.

Mummy and now, you are telling us, granny is on your side as you fight that evil dragon the British press. Funny that as our beloved late Queen’s longtime mantra was ‘never complain, never explain’ and yet you say she would be backing you …… the biggest complainer on the planet.

My word those mushrooms are good.
 
Harry suggesting that the late Queen supported his quest against the free press is extremely questionable and I bet some of his relatives are furious about it. He has no right to put words into the mouths of dead people who can't speak for themselves.

I think everyone was appalled at the way the press behaved with the phone hacking etc. This isn’t the same as supporting Harry's view that he can never be criticised for anything or held to account.

If the ginger dandelion thinks that it's too unsafe for his wife to visit Britain and he fears attacks from the general public then he should give up his citizenship, his titles and place in the line of succession. Become an American citizen Harry and don't ever come back here.
 
Ginger Dandelion is really cracking me up today. 😂

I wonder what would happen if we called his bluff on the security?

Supposing we say, OK you can pay (as you so clearly stated that you would pay) for Met security in the UK and it will cost £x (putting in an exorbitant amount due to the twit putting a target on his own back) but equally say you don’t need full IPP status as you can clearly go to other countries without the worry of extra security, so IPP not required– its seems you only need extra security in the UK.

(I am even OK with KC out of his own funds paying for it, but he needs to be kept away from ever getting back IPP status)

His reaction would determine as to whether he really wants security and to pay for it, or if it’s the IPP status he wants. My bet is he really wants security paid for round the clock no matter where he is as he can’t afford to keep paying for his delusional required. At least then ‘we’ can say the heightened level of security was offered. Let’s be honest, we as taxpayers are paying for it already, just look at the charade when he came over to see KC recently.

He still won’t be happy with this and come up with some other reason as to why he can’t bring the Ho and his kids to the UK as what he really wants is IPP status, not just the security.

I know there is the argument that would open the floodgates of ‘security for hire’ from our public services, but I genuinely don’t think it would come to that as he has no intention of paying for it and would keep fighting for full IPP – that’s his goal
 
I haven't watched the program yet but I assumed he would just say whatever Meghan has told him to say. Hearing that he has mentioned potential acid and knife attacks made me instantly think 'that's come from her'.

Being booed would actually hurt her more and we know this is the reason she won't come here he cannot bring her here.
 
PurpleReign said:
Ginger Dandelion is really cracking me up today. 😂

I wonder what would happen if we called his bluff on the security?

Supposing we say, OK you can pay (as you so clearly stated that you would pay) for Met security in the UK and it will cost £x (putting in an exorbitant amount due to the twit putting a target on his own back) but equally say you don’t need full IPP status as you can clearly go to other countries without the worry of extra security, so IPP not required– its seems you only need extra security in the UK.

(I am even OK with KC out of his own funds paying for it, but he needs to be kept away from ever getting back IPP status)

His reaction would determine as to whether he really wants security and to pay for it, or if it’s the IPP status he wants. My bet is he really wants security paid for round the clock no matter where he is as he can’t afford to keep paying for his delusional required. At least then ‘we’ can say the heightened level of security was offered. Let’s be honest, we as taxpayers are paying for it already, just look at the charade when he came over to see KC recently.

He still won’t be happy with this and come up with some other reason as to why he can’t bring the Ho and his kids to the UK as what he really wants is IPP status, not just the security.

I know there is the argument that would open the floodgates of ‘security for hire’ from our public services, but I genuinely don’t think it would come to that as he has no intention of paying for it and would keep fighting for full IPP – that’s his goal
Click to expand...
where I'm from a dandelion is referred to as a Pee the bed! ....... interesting that he won't let his wife come although I didn't hear any mention of the alleged children!
 
Scotch Mist said:
https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...13673943/JAN-MOIR-Harry-outrageous-claim.html
How very convenient of Prince Harry to blame the rift with his family on his one-sided, obsessive, eternal battle with the tabloid and popular Press.

He made the claim on last night's documentary Tabloids On Trial (ITV), telling sympathetic Health Correspondent Rebecca Barry it was his 'mission' against newspapers that destroyed the relationship with his family. Was it really?

'Yeah, that's certainly a central piece to it,' he said, nodding from deep within the ruff of hair that now encircles his entire face, like a giant, ginger dandelion. 'But, you know, that's a hard question to answer because anything I say about my family results in a torrent of abuse from the Press.'

Torrent of abuse? Tsk. Clearly, three years in California have done little to halt the growth of Harry's giant beanstalk of a martyr complex. He's one of those pampered sensitivos whose elite status makes him believe that any mild disagreement with his views is a vicious personal attack.

dumbfounded by your most sanctimonious claim to date. Which seems to be that you fell out with the Windsors because of your — checks notes — war on newspapers? Have I got that right?

'It would be nice,' he added, 'if we could do it as a family.'

It would be nice! Do it as a family! Why am I shouting? Just at the utter audacity of it all. Prince Harry has been so rude about his family for so long, painting them as ribbon-cutting dolts while he and only he, armed with his A-level in art and his grim wife, is guided by a higher moral purpose.

And this new pet theory of his neatly absolves the Prince of any responsibility for deserting not only his royal duty, but his duty as a brother and a son. It excuses him for the cruel things he wrote in his autobiography Spare about his family, including his stepmother ('dangerous'), his sister-in-law (imperious demands, wife who fitted the royal mould, utter witch who made darling Megs cry) and damning passages depicting his father as a damaged, dithering adult who loves his teddy bear and fears emotional intimacy. It ignores the fact that it was Prince William whose Chief of Staff first went to the police with his suspicions of illegal phone hacking.

Let's not forget it also exempts Harry from any accountability over that nasty business of globally smearing the entire Royal Family as racists fretting over the colour of baby Archie's skin. Then vowing never to reveal the true identities of the two individuals allegedly involved before it somehow became public — whoopsadaisy, thanks Omid — that it was CH*RL*S and K*TE all along.

Harry (with Meghan at his side) has broken the blood bond by repeatedly invading the Royals' collective and individual privacy on television, in documentary projects, in print, on film, via Oprah, Anderson Cooper, Netflix, Apple, and Tom Bradby — perhaps even on a podcast near you right now.

Indeed, I've never understood why the Duke and Duchess of Sussex continue to ostracise poor old Thomas Markle for his silly but minor transgression with newspapers, when what they've done together is a thousand times worse — on an industrial scale.

For the truth is that Prince Harry and the Royal Family fell out about a lot of things a long time ago. And to blame the rift on his Press crusade is not just disingenuous, it also provides him with the perfect excuse and a freshly minted get-out-of-jail-free card.

I suspect it's not what King Charles or Prince William would say, it's not what the Princess of Wales would say, it's not what all the scolded courtiers and former palace staff members would say about what really caused the royal rift. However, it is what Prince Harry says and in Harry's world, what Harry says goes — because who is going to argue with him?

Up there in his gilded Californian mansion, with his polo pals and his grandiose Archewell website — a total iron dome of dumb — he lives in a confected orbit of celebrity by proxy; he is a fish out of water, a prince in a republic, a rebel on pause. Today, the Sussexes exist as an abstract construct built on stunts and showbiz buzz, measuring out their existence by embarking on crusades and accepting embarrassing awards such as the Ripple of Hope or the Living Legend of Aviation.

Against the wishes of the late soldier's mother, who along with ex-military chiefs, urged him to turn it down, Prince Harry accepted the Pat Tillman Award for Service at a recent star-studded event in Los Angeles. It was the action of a man so desperate to be seen in a heroic light that he'd risk ridicule and controversy just to add another medal to his trophy cupboard.

Prince Harry's life now is propped up by such awards, along with honorary accolades and his assorted pet projects. Some of them, like the Invictus Games, are indeed noble. Yet blaming his grievances against the Press as the reason for his ongoing isolation from the rest of his family is fooling absolutely no one. Except himself.
Click to expand...
Absolutely spot on article!

Harry&Meghan #456

Rebel without a pause
 
da1sycha1n said:
where I'm from a dandelion is referred to as a Pee the bed! ....... interesting that he won't let his wife come although I didn't hear any mention of the alleged children!
Click to expand...


yes, we were told as children that if you pick a dandelion you will wet the bed.
---
LadyMuck said:
Absolutely spot on article!

Harry&Meghan #456

Rebel without a pause
Click to expand...

Definitely rebel with out a bleeping clue
 
LadyMuck said:
TRG. Propaganda Prince manipulates the public

Click to expand...


I particularly liked the bit where Hugh Grant said he had to settle ‘they said it could cost me £10 million …and i just thought, No, that’s too much…I can’t risk £10 million …..”

I just thought ‘ Bloody hell, man, it’s not that long ago you risked it ALL for $20 !!!!!!!!!!’

( apologies if slightly off topic….
…but Noah, Anne Frank and David Bowie said it’s a good point…post it )
 
Nauseating drivel from Grazia about Lili's wonderful summer. What about Aldi?

graziamagazine.com

Princess Lilibet Diana Gets an Enchanting, Royal Summer

Discover Meghan and Harry's summer plans with Princess Lilibet Diana, featuring trips to Disneyland and luxurious getaways.
graziamagazine.com graziamagazine.com


. And there you have it! With plans as enchanting and adventurous as their lives, Meghan, Harry, and Princess Lilibet Diana will certainly have a summer to remember. So, next time you find yourself in need of some family fun inspo, just think, what would the Sussexes do?
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:
 
PurpleReign said:
Ginger Dandelion is really cracking me up today. 😂

I wonder what would happen if we called his bluff on the security?

Supposing we say, OK you can pay (as you so clearly stated that you would pay) for Met security in the UK and it will cost £x (putting in an exorbitant amount due to the twit putting a target on his own back) but equally say you don’t need full IPP status as you can clearly go to other countries without the worry of extra security, so IPP not required– its seems you only need extra security in the UK.

(I am even OK with KC out of his own funds paying for it, but he needs to be kept away from ever getting back IPP status)

His reaction would determine as to whether he really wants security and to pay for it, or if it’s the IPP status he wants. My bet is he really wants security paid for round the clock no matter where he is as he can’t afford to keep paying for his delusional required. At least then ‘we’ can say the heightened level of security was offered. Let’s be honest, we as taxpayers are paying for it already, just look at the charade when he came over to see KC recently.

He still won’t be happy with this and come up with some other reason as to why he can’t bring the Ho and his kids to the UK as what he really wants is IPP status, not just the security.

I know there is the argument that would open the floodgates of ‘security for hire’ from our public services, but I genuinely don’t think it would come to that as he has no intention of paying for it and would keep fighting for full IPP – that’s his goal
Click to expand...
I am not ok with KC3 paying for it, because then the expectation will be for William to carry on paying for it.

Also, if one person is told they can pay for it, it will then be open to challenge from other people, so they can pay for it too.
 
And so say all of us !
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240726_100018_YouTube.jpg
    Screenshot_20240726_100018_YouTube.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 13
  • Screenshot_20240726_100008_YouTube.jpg
    Screenshot_20240726_100008_YouTube.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 6
Scotch Mist said:
Harry suggesting that the late Queen supported his quest against the free press is extremely questionable and I bet some of his relatives are furious about it. He has no right to put words into the mouths of dead people who can't speak for themselves.

I think everyone was appalled at the way the press behaved with the phone hacking etc. This isn’t the same as supporting Harry's view that he can never be criticised for anything or held to account.

If the ginger dandelion thinks that it's too unsafe for his wife to visit Britain and he fears attacks from the general public then he should give up his citizenship, his titles and place in the line of succession. Become an American citizen Harry and don't ever come back here.
Click to expand...
Ginger Dandelion - brilliant!
 
JAR21 said:
I am not ok with KC3 paying for it, because then the expectation will be for William to carry on paying for it.

Also, if one person is told they can pay for it, it will then be open to challenge from other people, so they can pay for it too.
Click to expand...


I do agree somewhat and the whole thing is very infuriating, but he is not going to stop all the while he finds a judge that keeps leaving the door open a crack for him. - at an ongoing cost to the taxpayer.

I don't have a problem with KC paying out of his own money, its his dumb ass son that he has not brought to task on anything, so I have no problem with him paying out guilt money.

William wont have to pay - by the time William is king, the ginger dandelion will be even less significant and probably safe and secure in a long-term psychiatric facility.

This needs to be put to bed once and for all and someone with balls to say 'no that's it, no more fighting this case' and we can all move on. At the moment the ginger dandelion is being encouraged to continue by letting him appeal all the time.

It wont get to the stage of setting a prescience and others wanting to pay for security, as this is not what the ginger dandelion wants - he wants IPP status and if offered security that he can pay for, I would guarantee 100% he would turn it down and change his mind and continue fighting for it to be paid for - because he's special
 
Last edited:
Based on the clips I’ve seen his logic is that he won’t bring his wife back to the UK because it will only take one person to put her at risk and this person will have been fueled by negative tabloid press coverage against them. He then completely undermines his argument when his wife has been back for the Jubillee, the Queens funeral (where she even went on a walkabout to greet potential acid/knife wielding lunatics), the Well Child awards….what a spoofer he is. Also, the UK is so dangerous that I’m bringing Invictus Games there!

???

It’s more emotional manipulation to further his entitled wish to get full time security. Gullible people watching are meant to be riled up to back him on that. The reality is that himself and his wife buggered off to make some dosh and given how talentless they are they made that dosh by (ironically) riling people up by waging a campaign against the royal family and the people of the UK. They made that decision, not the tabloid press, who could care less so long as they went about their business like normal celebrities. The real reason he won’t bring his wife back is not risk to life or disfigurement but rather that he knows that the UK regards him and his wife as a pair see you next tuesdays who won’t get anything near the regard and respect his brother and his wife enjoy.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top