Harry and Meghan #31 Preach and Screech continue to leech

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
freda19 said:
Hello new person.
First world problems eh?
That bleep who was begging for receipts re smeggy's cost to us tax payers is a professor who has weird subjects, something about money but with
weird wording. Business management and economics are becoming so last century darling.
Click to expand...
That professor person blocked me too - bearing in mind on twitter I'm a professional photographer, I only ever tweet about projects or events I'm working on. I've never once commented on Smeg or anything political at all - I do follow Murky Meg though, maybe that's it?

I remember photographing a high - profile event a while ago with GM Mayor - the Mayor's Twitter account tweeted the photos & tagged me (as they were great pics obvs 😀 )

Both the GM Mayor's official account as well as his personal account thread got trolled by Sugars complaining that GM Mayors office have chosen a photographer who preached racist hate & they would like to lodge an official complaint for using public money to hire such a shameful photographer. o_O

The government Advisor that had booked me sent me screen shots and asked me to explain it! All I'd done was follow murky meg - that's how utterly rabid the sugars are. The Mayors office have not asked me to photograph any more events since then thanks to those what freda says!! The event was months earlier so they must have really trawled the twitterverse to be able to track one of my jobs. Just for following murky meg - so imagine the abuse she must get!
 
Baguette said:
The problem for me is that Travalyst is being described as a charity when it's a plain straightforward limited company, that somehow has been awarded 300k of money from the Royal Foundation, which by charter can only award grants to, well, charities. And then we're being told that they plan to rent office space in Soho House, presumably using this grant. Nope.

I've got no problem with Haz or Megz spending their own money with their mates. Just not 'charity funds' or taxpayer dosh.

ETA As Lady Muck says, Travalyst's registered office is in the City so the Soho House White City office space thing might just have been free PR rather than a plan.
Click to expand...
Could be The Ned which is in the city and owned by Soho House.

Totally The Ned is where Travel-is-tit. Its just up from Cannon st on Poultry, right by BlackRock (hedge fund), Bank of England, The Rothschilds etc etc keeping the money close. A map -cause i got time. 🤣🤣
 

Attachments

  • C28D27E7-BA3F-431C-998A-C13C1D699AAD.png
    C28D27E7-BA3F-431C-998A-C13C1D699AAD.png
    84.9 KB · Views: 62
Last edited:
lozenger said:
That professor person blocked me too - bearing in mind on twitter I'm a professional photographer, I only ever tweet about projects or events I'm working on. I've never once commented on Smeg or anything political at all - I do follow Murky Meg though, maybe that's it?

I remember photographing a high - profile event a while ago with GM Mayor - the Mayor's Twitter account tweeted the photos & tagged me (as they were great pics obvs 😀 )

Both the GM Mayor's official account as well as his personal account thread got trolled by Sugars complaining that GM Mayors office have chosen a photographer who preached racist hate & they would like to lodge an official complaint for using public money to hire such a shameful photographer. o_O

The government Advisor that had booked me sent me screen shots and asked me to explain it! All I'd done was follow murky meg - that's how utterly rabid the sugars are. The Mayors office have not asked me to photograph any more events since then thanks to those what freda says!! The event was months earlier so they must have really trawled the twitterverse to be able to track one of my jobs. Just for following murky meg - so imagine the abuse she must get!
Click to expand...
Holy tit what a herd of cunts they are! :eek:I'm sorry you went through that. They're trying the same tit with murky meg(I think) trying to find out if she's on benefits so they can report her. They really are scum bags and very apt followers of the Douchess of Silly Walks.
 
Campagne said:
Kate needs to have another baby for Louis to cuddle!


You need an Instagram of all your compilations

]
Click to expand...

I'm too lazy to use Instagram for my photos lol 🤭 I do keep them though in my Amazon drive app 🙂

I also use the bookmarks feature on here to keep some of my favourite items as well as also if I want to keep things that other members have written that I can save..it's another great option I like on this website 🙂 xx
 
lozenger said:
That professor person blocked me too - bearing in mind on twitter I'm a professional photographer, I only ever tweet about projects or events I'm working on. I've never once commented on Smeg or anything political at all - I do follow Murky Meg though, maybe that's it?

I remember photographing a high - profile event a while ago with GM Mayor - the Mayor's Twitter account tweeted the photos & tagged me (as they were great pics obvs 😀 )

Both the GM Mayor's official account as well as his personal account thread got trolled by Sugars complaining that GM Mayors office have chosen a photographer who preached racist hate & they would like to lodge an official complaint for using public money to hire such a shameful photographer. o_O

The government Advisor that had booked me sent me screen shots and asked me to explain it! All I'd done was follow murky meg - that's how utterly rabid the sugars are. The Mayors office have not asked me to photograph any more events since then thanks to those what freda says!! The event was months earlier so they must have really trawled the twitterverse to be able to track one of my jobs. Just for following murky meg - so imagine the abuse she must get!
Click to expand...
Its really shocking you were treated like that. Did you challenge their pathetic decision? Following Murky Meg isn't a crime. You shouldn't be able to accuse someone of racism without evidence. Disliking Meghan isn't proof of racism.
 
kev1974 said:
Good. She won't be able to hear them in her LA basement video bunker anyway.

Quite why they would ever have been rung for her I don't know, should keep stuff like that for proper birth royals.

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...ring-bells-Meghan-Markles-birthday-month.html
Click to expand...




They don't ring them for Prince Harry now either, the only Grandchildren included are William, Kate and their children (direct line of succession and spouses). Bit of a none story really.

Harry will re qualify when Charles becomes King, Meghan will never have them rung as she will only be the wife of a more junior Royal.

http://gertsroyals.blogspot.com/2018/01/uk-royal-birthday-bells-flag-gun-salutes.html
 
Last edited:
Scotch Mist said:
A woman I used to work with had bunion surgery as she was obsessed with wearing 'pretty' shoes. She was off work for months and then found that she couldn't wear the type of shoes she wanted to wear because of the pain. Then it didn't set right and she had to have one foot operated on again (cue more time off work) and it was all for vanity as her feet didn't hurt before she had all the surgery.🙄
Click to expand...

My neighbour had hers done on both feet at the same time. She said the pain was unbearable and if she had known beforehand she would never have had the op. 😒
 
Scotch Mist said:

Latest Murky Meg about Meghan claiming that the media ruined her relationship with her dad 🤨
She's playing the victim again 🥱
Click to expand...

As Murky Meg says, if you're a liar then you have to have a good memory. MM blaming tabloids for ruining the relationship with her dad, yet H gave radio interview Dec '17 stating she now has the family she never had. He also had not met with TM which was strange if they were such a loving family. The media had not printed anything negative at that time nor up until the wedding in May '18.
 
I have always thought that Meghan was very pretty.
Her actions are ugly, though.
It is a shame that she had so much work done as I no longer find her attractive.
I think she may have ruined her looks, have to see how things settle.
Catherine is very attractive, also.

2F594006-D233-4E0E-B939-16E771002589.png
 
freda19 said:
Holy tit what a herd of cunts they are! :eek:I'm sorry you went through that. They're trying the same tit with murky meg(I think) trying to find out if she's on benefits so they can report her. They really are scum bags and very apt followers of the Douchess of Silly Walks.
Click to expand...
I know right?
Scotch Mist said:
Its really shocking you were treated like that. Did you challenge their pathetic decision? Following Murky Meg isn't a crime. You shouldn't be able to accuse someone of racism without evidence. Disliking Meghan isn't proof of racism.
Click to expand...
No but they know I am absolutely not racist since my husband and son are Asian / wh mix but I think they just wanted to avoid the whole twitter attention (though I could have just unfollowed Murky but why the hell should I - I like her posts). To be honest there's not even been any events to photograph anyway :(
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top