Harry and Meghan #31 Preach and Screech continue to leech

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
LadyMuck said:
www.express.co.uk

Meghan Markle prepares to issue 'controversial criticism'

MEGHAN MARKLE is preparing to tackle "controversial issues" and "public criticism" as the Duchess of Sussex marks a huge break with her Royal Family past.
www.express.co.uk www.express.co.uk
Gawd help us
Click to expand...
What a load of utter bollox.
Most people critiqued her speech as either word salad bollox or something written by a junior speech writer with no clear message other than "duck the royals anyway and don't I look gorge with my new hair and apple cheeks".
There is no way big Mike and Hills (I call them that you know🤭) will have approved of her telling youngsters to take to the streets and rebel against the establishment ... because while we know smeggy meant the Royals, in the USA Mike and Hills are part and parcel of the establishment there. They won't have enjoyed watching recent events and were likely shitting bricks in case the lovely little groups of rioters turned up at their gates.
 
I have now idea to what extent or if at all, those analyses about the dynamics and actions between Chares, the BRF, Diana and the boys contain much or any truth.
I do think howeverthe Middletons were godsend for Wiliam. Think of them what you like, no family is perfect. But taking the spouse of your child in like your own and providing him with a way better family dynamic than what he had experienced probably made all the difference. I think we only see in the last years the full effect of this. His relationship with his father and Camilla seems warm and amicable- at least publicly. His relationship with the media seems to be on more relaxed terms (I think we all remember how it was when George was born) and he seems to have found a way to carry the burden that will fall on him at one point. Good for him.
Maybe, if Harry would have found the same (through a spouse or close friends) he would have taken a different route. Being allowed everything because you basically don’t count as long as your brother is alive must have made a lasting impression. We see the damaging after effects. But Harry is an adult and had years of therapy. He should be aware of his problematic up bringing and should have found ways to identify toxic behaviour and how to redirect his actions. I think he is well aware but at one point had chosen to take the (in first sight) easy path. It had worked for him for years. Now, there are suddenly consequences and instead of taking a step back and really question what is happening, he acts out. A petulant, shiny brat.
While I think the relationship with Meghan didn’t help this, it’s really not her fault or her job to make up for that. He has to save himself. Meghan comes with her own faults and I believe a massive chip on her shoulder and they find themselves in a downward spiral they both feed.
Being out of the royal profile could have been a chance for Harry. Define yourself knew. Define the relationship to your brother and family new, apart from being the spare. He could have made a clean cut. It probably would have saved his private family relationship with them. But instead they over played their hand and tried to cherry pick. The crown is no push over. I am sure HM would have loved to give in personally (she really is not a consequent family leader) but her first duty always lies with the crown. Even when she does it reluctantly. Hopefully she realises that cutting them and her wretched excuse for a son off will stabilere the Crowns position. I cannot wait for that.
 
Now Harry and Prince William have parted ways personally and financially I wonder if there is any way Harry's share of whats left in the pot could be just handed over to him? "Here you go, thats the lot and no more to give" a do what you like gesture. Perhaps he'd understand the cash cow is out of milk and he's got to go shopping for more like the rest of us.
 
MollyMooo said:
🤔 I thought that meant to tweet (retweet)
Click to expand...
Apologies again! Not sure what the friggin is going on here! The response above was in response to someone telling me how to link from twitter. I tried, but it didn’t work. The tweet I was referring to was from ‘the troudors’ spellcheck keeps changing the name and I’m giving up now. Anyway, it was a tweet, retweeted from Katie Hopkins explaining why piers Morgan had changed tack....he’s chasing the first interview from mm 🤢
 
LadyMuck said:
Click to expand...

Normally I love her work, but this time I think she's way off beam. Smeggy would rather go bald and balloon to 20 stone rather than go back to England for anything other than a brief visit under cover of darkness with nobody noticing.
She doesn't give a shiny tit how haribo feels, it's all about her. She'll hang around like a demented cling-on waiting out corona and hoping haribo can do some more elevator pitches to get her work. England is not on the agenda. She'll hang in even if it causes haribo to crack up. He's served his purpose and is disposable. Not just yet, as that would reflect badly on her, but his arse is halfway out the door since he put that ring on her finger and she put hers through his nose. By Christmas the cracks will be becoming more obvious. Christmas Royal style is nothing remotely like Christmes USA style and the penny will drop a little further that this is not the life he wants. Rainy snowy England will look hugely appealing.
 
mardymare said:
İ think this was the best possible outcome for Bea. She always comes across as mature/low key and having an intimate ceremony would possibly have more meaning for her. Happy that Brenda and Phil were able to attend. Happy that H & M were ignored.
Click to expand...
Perhaps the whole family were there, and they’ve put out only PP & HMQ attended sO Cringe and Ginge don’t get their asses in the air 🤣🤣🤣

Socklicker said:
56qekvo.jpg

untitled-31vzjzp.jpg

untitled-41fqjoe.jpg

untitled-1y5kn1.jpg

untitled-1cijck.jpg
Click to expand...
“Planning a trip to get away from it all”? That’s all that pair o’ bastards ever do!
 
lira said:
Hello! Finally decided to stop lurking and join in. Absolutely love this thread, although I didn't check it for 2 days and came back to a lot of pages to catch up on! Anyway... :m
Click to expand...
Welcome stranger.:m

MollyMooo said:
Apologies again! Not sure what the friggin is going on here! The response above was in response to someone telling me how to link from twitter. I tried, but it didn’t work. The tweet I was referring to was from ‘the troudors’ spellcheck keeps changing the name and I’m giving up now. Anyway, it was a tweet, retweeted from Katie Hopkins explaining why piers Morgan had changed tack....he’s chasing the first interview from mm 🤢
Click to expand...
I don't believe it though.
He couldn't control his temper and she wouldn't have the balls to face him.
 
Last edited:
Being charitable (sorry, pun...) about Travalyst for a moment - it was only incorporated on 3rd April. Even if they put the paperwork in to the Charity Commission the same day, it still takes months for the Charity Commission to process the application and decide whether or not to grant it charitable status. I did one in Scotland last year, the limited company was registered in July, we didn't get charitable status for it until November. So it's entirely possible it will be a registered charity some time in the next couple of months, but they're bogged down at the CC. They could have set it up as a CIO (Charitable Incorporated Organisation) which wouldn't have appeared on Companies House at all, but if they knew they had money coming in from the Foundation and needed somewhere to put it, a limited company would be the quickest way of doing it. They can convert it to a CIO at a later date if they want to have their accounts less public.
 
neo_wales said:
Now Harry and Prince William have parted ways personally and financially I wonder if there is any way Harry's share of whats left in the pot could be just handed over to him? "Here you go, thats the lot and no more to give" a do what you like gesture. Perhaps he'd understand the cash cow is out of milk and he's got to go shopping for more like the rest of us.
Click to expand...
Harry was already given more than his fair share of the inheritance from the Queen Mum, as William knew he was going to be rich as King.
The amount of Prince Charles’ Duchy of Cornwall money which has been wasted on Harry, I think William will be within his rights, when Prince of Wales, to withhold anymore cash from Harry.
If he comes back divorced, then he’s got Frogmore and he can get a handout from the Duchy of Lancaster and do royal duties or piss off to Africa and do some real charity work
 
Toto said:
Off topic: Did you frequent Maggie Jones, and Jimmy's Wine Bar? 😀
Click to expand...
Did not go to Maggie Jones I don’t think but if Jimmy’s was downstairs in a basement with a live singer, I spent many a night in there. My time there was a blur, usually alcohol fuelled. I was in my 20s 🙌. There was also a great wine bar upstairs on Ken High Street, always there for Beaujolais day! I lived in Bullingham Mansions and loved every minute of it. Ahhhh, those were the days 😢 You got me in the nostalgia feels x
 
Falkor said:
Being charitable (sorry, pun...) about Travalyst for a moment - it was only incorporated on 3rd April. Even if they put the paperwork in to the Charity Commission the same day, it still takes months for the Charity Commission to process the application and decide whether or not to grant it charitable status. I did one in Scotland last year, the limited company was registered in July, we didn't get charitable status for it until November. So it's entirely possible it will be a registered charity some time in the next couple of months, but they're bogged down at the CC. They could have set it up as a CIO (Charitable Incorporated Organisation) which wouldn't have appeared on Companies House at all, but if they knew they had money coming in from the Foundation and needed somewhere to put it, a limited company would be the quickest way of doing it. They can convert it to a CIO at a later date if they want to have their accounts less public.
Click to expand...
Interesting.
How could it be classed as a charity though? It benefits nobody and doesn't even fulfill a useful purpose.
Who in holy heck wants some eejit dicking around with their travel plans for party central Ibiza or brit infused Benidorm to try to nudge them into a yurt in ButtFuckEgypt halfway up an uninhabited mountain accessed via a three day donkey trek? "for the environment" my arse.
As someone said upthread, 👏it's like a concept a whacky team on the Apprentice would conjure up and Sugar baby would rip it and it's inventor to shreds as unworkable.
 
Most fee-paying schools manage to get registered as charities, there are big tax advantages. They provide a few bursaries to the 'deserving poor' - I expect Travalyst will establish some kind of scholarship fund providing the flights for students in developing countries to travel back and forth to top-class universities or something similar.
 
Campagne said:
Harry was already given more than his fair share of the inheritance from the Queen Mum, as William knew he was going to be rich as King.
The amount of Prince Charles’ Duchy of Cornwall money which has been wasted on Harry, I think William will be within his rights, when Prince of Wales, to withhold anymore cash from Harry.
If he comes back divorced, then he’s got Frogmore and he can get a handout from the Duchy of Lancaster and do royal duties or piss off to Africa and do some real charity work
Click to expand...

Not Frogmore, the family need to find a good use for it, plenty of apartments in other palaces he can use.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top