Harry and Meghan #30 Full of spite, come on Royal Family put and end to their..

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
⬆ “Meghan Markle is someone who has always tried to get what she wants out of people and then after she gets what she wants, she has nothing more to do with them”

“She is a user, she is someone who has manipulated her way to where she is right now. She has been a person who has demonstrated very bad character...”

Bear that in mind Hazza, and start looking for cheap flights ✈️
 
Norbs said:
Is it? Do you have any more info on this? I’d be interested to read it (and am at a loose end this afternoon).
Click to expand...

Lady C's book is a pretty good summary. At the outset Megz wanted control of the wedding and mostly got it - hence being able to disinvite all her family bar Doria, Harry's wider family (like Lady Amelia WIndsor) and pack it with Hollywood types that she didn't actually know. The wedding was running on a ridiculously tight schedule of 6 months anyway, and the persistent rumours were that H&M wouldn't make their decisions but were busy saying what they didn't want. I'd never heard the story about the 12 versions of Stand By Me but that fits right in. She wouldn't be the first Bridezilla so at the time I didn't think much of the noises leaking out.

NotDumbNotBlonde said:
Thank you for clarifying, I'll get my coat now as I'm remembering incorrectly!

I don't think the Royal Family are using the Harkle Debarkle to take the focus off Creepy Uncle Andrew, I think the Harkles are drawing adverse attention all by themselves by their behaviour.
Click to expand...

The Harkles relentless, screaming PR is doing that. I mean, pap walk yesterday plus a flurry of press releases about the pap walk, PR for the clothing she was merching, the press pointing out their ridiculous use of a gas-guzzling Cadillac, the Harkles PR shouting 'Dentist' in case anyone starts writing about fertility doctors and IVF... it just goes on and on.

Oh, and someone has got to Karen Gibson of the Kingdom Choir

Sharing her thoughts on Meghan and Harry quitting royal life, Karen told Metro.co.uk: ‘It is disappointing because I actually think they’re an amazing couple. ‘Their aim is to do good in the world and they have plans so they couldn’t stay here anymore. It was such a brilliant beginning and now they feel that they’ve had to leave and that makes me feel sad, but I wish them all the best.’ She added: ‘I don’t blame them at all, I really hope and pray that they do what they’re meant to do in this world and influence in the best way possible.’

Not One. Single. Mention. of re-recording Stand By Me a dozen times. Hmmmmm.

metro.co.uk

Meghan and Harry’s wedding choir star Karen recalls 'magical' moment

The Kingdom Choir performed at the royal wedding in 2018.
metro.co.uk metro.co.uk
 
Margot1977 said:
Thank you Freda 😘 I did think of you the other day...went in the greenhouse and found 9(!) slugs, 2 shamelessly climbing the walls, the rest hiding!! They are no more...😁
Click to expand...
Lil bastards. :mad:My slug 'soup' is ready, nearly three weeks later they've all finally perished. Next job is decanting it AND IT STINKS! Dreading it, but if it helps protect the roots of my lovely tree lillies then I'll use it.

Sorry, off topic.:m
 
Doodlebug005 said:
I have just seen the Russell Royal Reporter on with Lorraine saying Karen Gibson the conductor of the Kingdom Choir has broken ranks by revealing H&M were very difficult to deal with, she had to prepare 12 different versions of "Stand by me" for the wedding , and H&M had to approve the one they wanted. Going to search for more info on this.


www.express.co.uk

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's royal wedding chaos

They raised the roof with their emotional rendition of Stand by Me at the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's wedding - but Kingdom Choir conductor Karen Gibson reveals how the royal couple never got to approve the final version.
www.express.co.uk www.express.co.uk
Click to expand...


The express version seems to have been rewritten since yesterday's publication, hmmmm
 
Be kond said:
Sorry if this is a bit of a silly question, but where do the “blind items” come from? Like who gets told for them to post it?
Click to expand...
They supposedly come from tips from people 'in the know'.
For example in the case of Royals often the staff drop stuff. Or from people on movie sets, shoots, restaurants etc eaves dropping.
It's surprising how loose tongued people can be in front of seemingly invisible underlings and staff, especially when drunk or high.
Then again they are often made up for click bait.;)
 
Nannyto2 said:
Smeggy prioff the veneers to sell them to make money for her special chosen charity
The princess of darkness fund
Click to expand...
I'm not surprised what she would do for money.....as Dolly says,it's takes alot of money to look this tit...or words to that effect..
I forget so much as I'm menopausal....that or its early onset dementia...
Oh I know what it is,the after effects of an alien 👽 abduction...they threw me back when I wouldn't stop talking rubbish...and writing essays...
Bloody ungrateful 👽👾I know where they buried the bodies....🤯🗝️🤪
 
antinoos said:
Can I just put in my two pennies on Ghislaine as the Epstein/PonceAndrew story is often conflated with the Markles: I actually feel some sympathy for her. She has not been entirely plausibly accused of anything actually illegal other than being a very rich, privileged and pre-eminently dislikeable/enviable person with a possibly kinky sex-life and terrible taste in men from Daddy onwards.

There is a strong element of misogyny/class envy and even anti-semitism and mob justice about the whole story. Those responsible for prosecuting her using the word "slithered"; widespread coverage that starts from the premise that she is a wicked child abuser and very little attention drawn to what she says which is that she is innocent of charges invented by known fantasists and damaged people; and that she hasn't seen Epstein for many many years.

Now this may all be bullshit and she may be the creepily attractive international child trafficker of an international pedophile ring; but thats for others in possession of all the facts to decide, not sundry me too maniacs and conspiracy theorists; and people getting off fantasising about what a terrible time she must be having. We need to know the truth.

We have been here before: Carl Beech remember that? The number of people absolutely convinced that the admittedly quite odd and uncomfortable in his own skin (and of course Jewish) Leon Britten had as Home Secretary dressed as a French Maid and stabbed teenage boys to death on a kitchen table, was truly remarkable. Some of them still believe it.

These are mad times. You know aunty likes history. In 1792 Marie Antoinettes best friend the pretty and vacuous Princess de Lamballe who everyone knew was her lesbian lover and dabbled in witchcraft was torn limb from limb and her body parts waived on poles under the prison windows of her terrified friend. There are definite parallels with the public lynching of Ghislaine, and at the end of the day she is a very frightened and vulnerable woman who deserves proper justice.

I need a drink...
Click to expand...
Controversial opinion, you are brave. :m But since we're here I'm not getting the problem with Andy. He had sex with a 17 yr old and that's not what I class as paedophilia, even though it is against the law in some countries. I doubt you could find a non sexually active pupil over the age of 15 /16 in any schools other than strict religious ones where virginity is a must before marriage.
Yes I'm aware he may be privy to nasty stuff but I doubt any of it would stand up in court even if he could recall any specific events.
I think a lot of people are using his downfall and the publicity seeking woman in question as a stick to beat the Royals with in another agenda. He's fucked up and Brenda has side lined him as much as a mother can with a 50 yr old man and the idea that she can drag him to the cop shop by the ear like a shop lifting 10 yr old is laughable.
He had sex with a 17 yr old years ago and that's not a big deal to me, sorry not sorry and that's all I'm saying on it.
(dons hard hat)
 
freda19 said:
They supposedly come from tips from people 'in the know'.
For example in the case of Royals often the staff drop stuff. Or from people on movie sets, shoots, restaurants etc eaves dropping.
It's surprising how loose tongued people can be in front of seemingly invisible underlings and staff, especially when drunk or high.
Then again they are often made up for click bait.;)
Click to expand...

Ah thank you very much for replying to me!
 
freda19 said:
Controversial opinion, you are brave. :m But since we're here I'm not getting the problem with Andy. He had sex with a 17 yr old and that's not what I class as paedophilia, even though it is against the law in some countries. I doubt you could find a non sexually active pupil over the age of 15 /16 in any schools other than strict religious ones where virginity is a must before marriage.
Yes I'm aware he may be privy to nasty stuff but I doubt any of it would stand up in court even if he could recall any specific events.
I think a lot of people are using his downfall and the publicity seeking woman in question as a stick to beat the Royals with in another agenda. He's fucked up and Brenda has side lined him as much as a mother can with a 50 yr old man and the idea that she can drag him to the cop shop by the ear like a shop lifting 10 yr old is laughable.
He had sex with a 17 yr old years ago and that's not a big deal to me, sorry not sorry and that's all I'm saying on it.
(dons hard hat)
Click to expand...
I mainly agree with you as in the UK if the girl was 16+ and consenting that's not a crime even though we might find it rather repugnant. Apparently he is accused of having sex with this girl in Florida where the age of consent is 18 and there is also the trafficking angle to take into account.
Personally I doubt that Andrew had any involvement with the trafficking but he should have been more careful. It remains to be seen if he can actually be charged with a crime.
 
Scotch Mist said:
I mainly agree with you as in the UK if the girl was 16+ and consenting that's not a crime even though we might find it rather repugnant. Apparently he is accused of having sex with this girl in Florida where the age of consent is 18 and there is also the trafficking angle to take into account.
Personally I doubt that Andrew had any involvement with the trafficking but he should have been more careful. It remains to be seen if he can actually be charged with a crime.
Click to expand...
She wouldn't have been introduced to him as "Here's a girl we trafficked Andy, enjoy yourself" though. She was likely just regarded as another party girl happy to mingle and party with rich people for whatever reasons.
But yes, his trysts were probably illegal in Florida, but did she even claim to be just 17 or did she do what all teens do and pretend to be older ?
Let's be honest, he was a Prince and far from ugly in his younger days and had no need to knowingly use trafficked girls when non trafficked ones were tripping over each other to get his attention.
I can't stand him, never could but it's become obvious that this is becoming a witch hunt against his family rather than him.

But we're hugely off topic again, sorry guys.
 
Silly-old-Slapper said:
The express version seems to have been rewritten since yesterday's publication, hmmmm
Click to expand...

Yes there's a big old clean-up about the whole 12 versions thing going on. Best not to let the public hear the truth...

Probably Karen Gibson (a very nice woman by all accounts and a talented musician) has been reminded of that pesky NDA she had to sign before Kingdom Choir were chosen for the wedding and someone is leaning on her to make the story go away.
 
Baguette said:
Yes there's a big old clean-up about the whole 12 versions thing going on. Best not to let the public hear the truth...

Probably Karen Gibson (a very nice woman by all accounts and a talented musician) has been reminded of that pesky NDA she had to sign before Kingdom Choir were chosen for the wedding and someone is leaning on her to make the story go away.
Click to expand...

We’re safe to assume that, like everything Murky has involvement in, everyone involved in wedding number 3 was put through their paces and probably would have run a mile given the choice.

I doubt the waffly religious dude, who lectured the congregation for what felt like hours, was planning on saying much as he probably saw her for what she was, but she pinned him up against the wall and made him.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top