Harry and Meghan #125 Harry's being silly but where the hell is Lili?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
What on earth did you say to trigger them? Not that it takes much I know.

Someone posted a cartoon about the missing jewels, to which I replied that she lost the jewels in a yachting accident with an LOL face. Apparently this is a sue-able offense. They ought to be retweeting what I said and making THAT the narrative, because it's a LOT better to be a clumsy dumbass than it is to be a thief. But what do I know?
 
Stolen from Twitter, apparently this is a link to ask for the Emmy Nomination to be withdrawn -


If not withdrawn, it should be moved to the Fiction category because it contained so many proven lies and it was proven that the british newspaper headlines the show used were not british.

and the suggested text from the tweeter is ....

View attachment 661906 q

Prince George to be kept out of the limelight now because of Social Media nastiness about him at the football matches.
One tweeter wanted to behead him!


#BOYCOTTemmys2021
 
By not clapping the woman has shown herself up and the fact that it's been picked up by the press I think is amusing. I doubt very much if William and Catherine are remotely bothered. They appear to be sat at the front of the box, I'm guessing had complimentary tickets and not a single duck given about who claps and who doesn't. Just makes chopra look pathetic petty and small minded. A bit like her so called friend.


I don't even know who this Chopra woman is. I'm guessing an awful lot of other people don't know who she is either. William will be King one day, still rubbing shoulders with the cream of society, and Chopra will be long forgotten.
 
The snub is real.



Doubt they'd give a flying f*ck to be honest. I'm not even sure it was a snub, she was too busy preening herself to notice anyone around her when they arrived. Mischief making headline over nothing
 
Not got far in the thread yet, just popping in to show my fellow Tattlers the message I just sent to the International Emmy Awards people. Doubt that it will be read, but anyway, this is my suave and sophisticated complaint. Thank you @Chita for the contact details!

'I am contacting you to object to the entry of Ms Winfrey's interview with Meghan Markle and Prince Harry in the 'Outstanding Hosted Non-Fiction Series or Special' for an Emmy award. My grounds for complaint are simply that the interview or conversation was ill-researched and inaccurate (with at least 18 provable falsehoods). Deviating from normal standards of 'non-fictional' journalism, the interviewer failed completely to hold her subjects to account, to challenge their false narrative or to contextualise their lies. Needless to say, this shoddiness offended the entirety of the UK and the Commonwealth. Ms Winfrey's reputation is at an all-time low and her best approach would be to revisit the subject in order to expose the lies so glibly told by Ms Markle. Even the faked headlines which purported to show the 'racism' in the British media were allowed to stand unchallenged. What kind of an interviewer does that? If the nomination has been bought and paid for, at least let it run in the Fiction category.
Thank you for your kind attention.'
 
While I believe that story about the DoE is worked up bs that's being shared for some reason, the thing with Charles prioritizing his wants over respecting the desires of his parents is kinda weird. The whole monarchy/heir thing only works if you take into account the wishes of those who came before you, so that the one after you does the same. I just can't see it. Otherwise he'll have the knowledge that he set the precedent for William to go 'naw duck all this I'll do what I want' when he becomes #1
 
While I believe that story about the DoE is worked up bs that's being shared for some reason, the thing with Charles prioritizing his wants over respecting the desires of his parents is kinda weird. The whole monarchy/heir thing only works if you take into account the wishes of those who came before you, so that the one after you does the same. I just can't see it. Otherwise he'll have the knowledge that he set the precedent for William to go 'naw duck all this I'll do what I want' when he becomes #1
The story is irrelevant bullshit though.
I'd be very surprised if Charles doesn't honour the wishes of his parents.

If Edward is going to be in charge of the 'Duke of Edinburgh Awards' it makes sense that he is the Duke of Edinburgh.

Bloody hell useless Andrew is a flaming Duke. It would be very unfair if the better brother who actually works for the crown isn't given a Dukedom.
 
While I believe that story about the DoE is worked up bs that's being shared for some reason, the thing with Charles prioritizing his wants over respecting the desires of his parents is kinda weird. The whole monarchy/heir thing only works if you take into account the wishes of those who came before you, so that the one after you does the same. I just can't see it. Otherwise he'll have the knowledge that he set the precedent for William to go 'naw duck all this I'll do what I want' when he becomes #1
Surely he can't do anything anyway? It must be within the Queen's remit? Forgive me if this has already been addressed.
 
I don't even know who this Chopra woman is. I'm guessing an awful lot of other people don't know who she is either. William will be King one day, still rubbing shoulders with the cream of society, and Chopra will be long forgotten.
She had her own "scarf" moment.... not sure why she was even there. I was more interested in the manspread that was RIGHT behind K and W and literally center of the cameraman's focus. Hilarious. check it out.

An interesting analysis of the rather digusting racist tweets (hate twitter) that the England loss generated, suggesting heavily that there are weird things afoot in twittershpere:
 
The account location, doesn't mean that the account and the maintainer are actually there.
Narratives.
A ungodly amount of "Russian bots" where not Russian, but American.
Propaganda 101, there is black, white, gray propaganda.
The principle is implicating someone by making it look like they did it, even when they did not, via names, spoofed locations..
It justifies politics, wars, sanctions and everything inbetween.

Noticeable in the squads "captured" racism tweets against Peg, a deep dig often reveals that the racist account never existed.
Yes, racism happens, but politics are a dark, evil place and social manipulation is mainstream.
One needs to earn money, lobby's need to profit, shareholders also, laws must be passed, " activism and activists" want their share of fame and money...
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top