Harry and Meghan #123 Too scared to speak to Gan-Gan because he’s a pathetic little man

[TheSlayer]

I genuinely don’t remember seeing a picture with anyone other than Hazno or Smegadron holding the blanket with the cabbage patch it in?

Knew I hadn’t quite descended into dementia - from Lucas timeline on Twitter

 

[Mrsoh]

Ahhhh so they wanted their own office to do what?

 

[freda19]

Of course, "The Me You Can't See" is another body double, a fake No.6! This must be the hidden meaning of the title of the Apple PsychoBabble Series with the Failed Weightwatcher. Also a sweet nod to ... conning the public.

Bit by bit things are becoming clearer. "Harriet" like Farch is available in several sizes. To date we've seen a 6'2" model in high heels at the statue unveiling with a pigeon chest, and a 5'11"model at PP's funeral with a concave chest.

I await with excitement the launch of the "Ginger Gnome" model, wrapped in blankets with Harriet's gnarled bunion coyly peeping out of a bouquet of St Diana's favourite forget-me-not flowers.... Behold Crazy Lil !!

Well the shoe lifts could explain the silly walk.
I did actually clock the dopey walk but put it down to nervousness/silliness, but if he was wearing lifts then that would expllain it. He just wasn't sure of his footing and was treading super carefully because the extra height discombobulated him.

 

[Chita]

Deluded morons like her believe their own shite doesnt stink.

And when they fart, it blossoms.
Good name that. Fartblossom.

 

[Chartreuse]

I thought those remarks about hierarchy were addressed to palace staff. It was shocking enough to me. As far as I am concerned people who have breeding and class speak and act with respect towards those who work for them. Don't dating hints include seeing how your date treats the waiter or waitress? She is beneath contempt and I await the revelation of her true character in the world's press with great expectation.

 

[Mrsoh]

"She was certainly not someone who was going to change herself just to please the people around her. I felt they also had to be reminded: 'You're not the stars of the show here. There is a hierarchy and you don't come very high in it.'"

And this is where the problems started, it's pretty much admitting that was she duck going to do what was asked of her.

 

[Cinnamon.girl]

Do ye really think the christening pic was shopped? How on earth would the others allow this?
Wasn't there talk of that pic of Archie meeting HMTQ and PP with Dorita in the background fake too? While nothing would surprise me with Beavis and Butthead.. I'd find it unlikely for the RF to partake in any of it?

I personally think the two photos you mention above were fake, but it's such a minefield and was discussed way back on these threads. It's a very complex issue and I doubt people want to go down this road again here.
I've always believed that No.6 and Smeg blackmailed the RF about absolutely everything from day one, and that blackmail encompasses these and other photos. You can say the RF were "complicit" but I think a better description would be that No.6 and Smeg leveraged them on the toxic "race" angle on some issues like their wedding budget. I also think the RF knew everything about the pregnancy, but turned a blind eye and their response will be that they did not know. We'll have to wait and see.

 

[YeltsinsTank]

I agree 100 % that it was pared down and minimalist. Harriet was cut off at the Richmond with few photo-ops or PR coverage, minimal attendees and a brief joint speech. He was deprived of an opportunity to preen and grandstand in his stilettos, and mention his wife and their dreary world vision one hair-plug at a time. The only person who came off badly and made a fool of himself was Henrietta, on meds and gurning like Les Dawson.

Interesting the comment that the Farch christening photo was probably fake as the two Spencer sisters can't possibly have aged so much in 2 years. Unless it's the markle effect, but they look at least 10 years younger in the christening photo.

The Christening photo came up again on twitter yesterday and I saw some really strange comments about why people think it's fake. I don't think it is, even the EXIF data doesn't bother me. I'm not addressing Cinnamon.girl with this; her post just made me think of it. I've looked at it before but I really went for it this time. Plus everyone has been saying they're bored, so here are my thoughts if you feel like reading something excruciatingly dull.

Spoiler: WHY THE CHRISTENING PHOTO IS PROBABLY NOT FAKE

• I say probably because never say never. Also MAN that furniture needs some touch-ups and Harry is not the only one with bad shoes. Camilla must have stepped in a massive puddle on the way there. I am not addressing surrogacy or how old the baby might be; I am only addressing the photo.
• The largest image I could find was 3500x3500. If someone has a larger copy I will look at it. I would like to get a closer look at Wiiliam's watch. I magnified everything in the latest version of Photoshop.
• Focus, lighting is consistent from figure to figure. It’s a professional pic, not lighting from a window, therefore there are not a lot of shadows on row 2 or behind them.
• Edges do not appear to have been trimmed or “cleaned up”
• Tiny things like lint, stray hairs, feathers that would be lost in cut outs are present on all figures. Bless William and his shiny pate.
• Claims that Catherine’s chair has no back legs are false. At 200% both chair legs can be clearly seen, though Catherine’s legs are obstructing most of the fourth leg. Also included a close-up of Camilla’s chair leg (and her water-stained shoe).
• Claims that there is no reflection in the mirror are false. Even at 100% a reflection of one of the hats can be seen in the mirror. As for not seeing anything else in the mirror, there’s no reason to see anyone else because the clock and flowers are blocking them, plus there’s the angle and distance—I think the mirror may be more deeply inset than it looks. The green area to either side of that border is actual damask and not more mirror, which is why there is no reflection in it.
• Time on the watch and clock are the same, though it is difficult to see. I have uploaded at 100% because the watch actually becomes more difficult to discern at higher magnification.
• Size of Will and Catherine are as they should be. I tried to find full length pix of some of them together for reference. I wanted shots of them going in and out of the Christening but couldn’t find any; I don’t know how to look it up on Getty. I found full length shots of William and Harry with Diana’s sisters. Catherine is a bit shorter than Will in heels, taller than Diana’s sisters. I don’t know if Diana’s sisters were wearing heels in the Christening pic or not. I tried to find pictures where they were on as level ground as possible. Catherine may also appear larger due to a brightly colored dress and the way that hat almost appears to be a braid and part of her head.
• In my judgment it was not a composite picture, and I doubt if it was taken on May 8th 2019. Charles & Camilla were in Germany, and Will & Catherine were in Wales.
• The image could have been enhanced in some way—brightness/contrast, a sharpening filter, run through lightroom, but that’s not the kind of image editing we’re looking for.
• Depending on the camera, EXIF data could be inaccurate if the date and time set on the camera itself are not correct. The data indicates the photo was taken with a Nikon D850, which allows for manual date/time setting. I don’t know how the photographer Chris Allerton maintains his equipment, and frankly, I don’t think anyone else does, either. My guess would be that he never set the date or time on his camera-- I've had some budget Sonys and it can be a PITA on some of them. Plus, anything on a computer can be tampered with or changed, including EXIF data (there are programs for it) but I don’t think that’s what happened here.

I think people are looking at smaller versions of this photo and drawing conclusions from that, in addition to not trusting anything H&M say or do. It's good to question H&M because they're liars, but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

 

[Scotch Mist]

@Cassandra333 Many thanks for the thread recap and the new thread ❤❤❤ xx.

I have just made this to leave here as I won't be able to catch up until later tonight
Its based on the thread title.

I've done the queen normal size..looking down at Harry who is very small and trying to run away after popping out of his mouse hole his been hiding in .

Back later to catch up..I'm on page 48 of the last thread

View attachment 649194 q

it's like 'Land of the Giants' I used to love that!

Smeggy has also had some bad luck.
The Monty Python foot is after her

 

[LadyMuck]

Latest Yankee Wally

 

[Wackie Jeaver]

The trouble with lying is that it all eventually unravels and then you get found out. Mind you, my brother always told me: "the best thing about public school is that you learn how to lie effortlessly and rise above it". He's a bit of a tit at times, but he has a point. Certainly old Etonians seem to manage the trick quite effectively.

 

[Cinnamon.girl]

The Christening photo came up again on twitter yesterday and I saw some really strange comments about why people think it's fake. I don't think it is, even the EXIF data doesn't bother me. I'm not addressing Cinnamon.girl with this; her post just made me think of it. I've looked at it before but I really went for it this time. Plus everyone has been saying they're bored, so here are my thoughts if you feel like reading something excruciatingly dull.

Spoiler: WHY THE CHRISTENING PHOTO IS PROBABLY NOT FAKE

• I say probably because never say never. Also MAN that furniture needs some touch-ups and Harry is not the only one with bad shoes. Camilla must have stepped in a massive puddle on the way there. I am not addressing surrogacy or how old the baby might be; I am only addressing the photo.
• The largest image I could find was 3500x3500. If someone has a larger copy I will look at it. I would like to get a closer look at Wiiliam's watch. I magnified everything in the latest version of Photoshop.
• Focus, lighting is consistent from figure to figure. It’s a professional pic, not lighting from a window, therefore there are not a lot of shadows on row 2 or behind them.
• Edges do not appear to have been trimmed or “cleaned up”
• Tiny things like lint, stray hairs, feathers that would be lost in cut outs are present on all figures. Bless William and his shiny pate.
• Claims that Catherine’s chair has no back legs are false. At 200% both chair legs can be clearly seen, though Catherine’s legs are obstructing most of the fourth leg. Also included a close-up of Camilla’s chair leg (and her water-stained shoe).
• Claims that there is no reflection in the mirror are false. Even at 100% a reflection of one of the hats can be seen in the mirror. As for not seeing anything else in the mirror, there’s no reason to see anyone else because the clock and flowers are blocking them, plus there’s the angle and distance—I think the mirror may be more deeply inset than it looks. The green area to either side of that border is actual damask and not more mirror, which is why there is no reflection in it.
• Time on the watch and clock are the same, though it is difficult to see. I have uploaded at 100% because the watch actually becomes more difficult to discern at higher magnification.
• Size of Will and Catherine are as they should be. I tried to find full length pix of some of them together for reference. I wanted shots of them going in and out of the Christening but couldn’t find any; I don’t know how to look it up on Getty. I found full length shots of William and Harry with Diana’s sisters. Catherine is a bit shorter than Will in heels, taller than Diana’s sisters. I don’t know if Diana’s sisters were wearing heels in the Christening pic or not. I tried to find pictures where they were on as level ground as possible. Catherine may also appear larger due to a brightly colored dress and the way that hat almost appears to be a braid and part of her head.
• In my judgment it was not a composite picture, and I doubt if it was taken on May 8th 2019. Charles & Camilla were in Germany, and Will & Catherine were in Wales.
• The image could have been enhanced in some way—brightness/contrast, a sharpening filter, run through lightroom, but that’s not the kind of image editing we’re looking for.
• Depending on the camera, EXIF data could be inaccurate if the date and time set on the camera itself are not correct. The data indicates the photo was taken with a Nikon D850, which allows for manual date/time setting. I don’t know how the photographer Chris Allerton maintains his equipment, and frankly, I don’t think anyone else does, either. My guess would be that he never set the date or time on his camera-- I've had some budget Sonys and it can be a PITA on some of them. Plus, anything on a computer can be tampered with or changed, including EXIF data (there are programs for it) but I don’t think that’s what happened here.

I think people are looking at smaller versions of this photo and drawing conclusions from that, in addition to not trusting anything H&M say or do. It's good to question H&M because they're liars, but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

Thank you Yeltsin for going through this. Very interesting and I can see the magnified chair legs as you say. Apart from the photo, there were lots of comments that the AoC was in a different part of the country so could not have performed the christening. Also the odd clothes and hats?
It will all come out in the wash, but in the meantime thank you for your forensic photography skills!

 

[Pom Bear]

You deserve a big round of applause a young family and dementia so fully understand what you are saying.

Just drop in when it suits you and when you have time, golden globe award for you will ask @pombear to do one for you, take carexxx

@Nuttynana that's a lovely idea and I've just designed and made the award for @bubbadabut x.

Sorry to mention lol but you've quoted the wrong Pom Bear xxx

Mine is @Pom Bear
The other one is someone else's account that no longer in use


Made me smile xx

Here is the award you suggested which is a lovely thought xx.

Back later .

 

[mycockapoorules]

BIB - they could just throw water over and she'd melt. We’ve all seen the Wizard of Oz!


We say “All mouth and no trousers.”

Or " All fur coat (Obv not real!) and no knickers! lol,

BTY Sorry late to the party but fab title and great recap!❤

 

[Nuttynana]

It occurs to me that there is truly a quiet before the storm.
Who can know what will happen next?
Mrs6 is recovering from surgery, no.6 is walking in high heels...
Truly they are a couple (wot Frieda says) & yet possibly more &/or less.
Will Hazza become Hazzie, MegBumpMaybe become Malcolm?
The first Royal Transits?

God help the rest of humanity with these 2 creepshoes

@Nuttynana that's a lovely idea and I've just designed and made the award for @bubbadabut ❤ x.

Sorry to mention lol but you've quoted the wrong Pom Bear xxx

Mine is @Pom Bear
The other one is someone else's account that no longer in use


Made me smile ❤❤❤❤❤ xx

Here is the award you suggested which is a lovely thought xx.

Back later .


View attachment 649517 q

Thank you Pom Bear will get it right next time, lovely award. Clever girlxxx

 

[kev1974]

The Christening photo came up again on twitter yesterday and I saw some really strange comments about why people think it's fake. I don't think it is, even the EXIF data doesn't bother me. I'm not addressing Cinnamon.girl with this; her post just made me think of it. I've looked at it before but I really went for it this time. Plus everyone has been saying they're bored, so here are my thoughts if you feel like reading something excruciatingly dull.

Spoiler: WHY THE CHRISTENING PHOTO IS PROBABLY NOT FAKE

• I say probably because never say never. Also MAN that furniture needs some touch-ups and Harry is not the only one with bad shoes. Camilla must have stepped in a massive puddle on the way there. I am not addressing surrogacy or how old the baby might be; I am only addressing the photo.
• The largest image I could find was 3500x3500. If someone has a larger copy I will look at it. I would like to get a closer look at Wiiliam's watch. I magnified everything in the latest version of Photoshop.
• Focus, lighting is consistent from figure to figure. It’s a professional pic, not lighting from a window, therefore there are not a lot of shadows on row 2 or behind them.
• Edges do not appear to have been trimmed or “cleaned up”
• Tiny things like lint, stray hairs, feathers that would be lost in cut outs are present on all figures. Bless William and his shiny pate.
• Claims that Catherine’s chair has no back legs are false. At 200% both chair legs can be clearly seen, though Catherine’s legs are obstructing most of the fourth leg. Also included a close-up of Camilla’s chair leg (and her water-stained shoe).
• Claims that there is no reflection in the mirror are false. Even at 100% a reflection of one of the hats can be seen in the mirror. As for not seeing anything else in the mirror, there’s no reason to see anyone else because the clock and flowers are blocking them, plus there’s the angle and distance—I think the mirror may be more deeply inset than it looks. The green area to either side of that border is actual damask and not more mirror, which is why there is no reflection in it.
• Time on the watch and clock are the same, though it is difficult to see. I have uploaded at 100% because the watch actually becomes more difficult to discern at higher magnification.
• Size of Will and Catherine are as they should be. I tried to find full length pix of some of them together for reference. I wanted shots of them going in and out of the Christening but couldn’t find any; I don’t know how to look it up on Getty. I found full length shots of William and Harry with Diana’s sisters. Catherine is a bit shorter than Will in heels, taller than Diana’s sisters. I don’t know if Diana’s sisters were wearing heels in the Christening pic or not. I tried to find pictures where they were on as level ground as possible. Catherine may also appear larger due to a brightly colored dress and the way that hat almost appears to be a braid and part of her head.
• In my judgment it was not a composite picture, and I doubt if it was taken on May 8th 2019. Charles & Camilla were in Germany, and Will & Catherine were in Wales.
• The image could have been enhanced in some way—brightness/contrast, a sharpening filter, run through lightroom, but that’s not the kind of image editing we’re looking for.
• Depending on the camera, EXIF data could be inaccurate if the date and time set on the camera itself are not correct. The data indicates the photo was taken with a Nikon D850, which allows for manual date/time setting. I don’t know how the photographer Chris Allerton maintains his equipment, and frankly, I don’t think anyone else does, either. My guess would be that he never set the date or time on his camera-- I've had some budget Sonys and it can be a PITA on some of them. Plus, anything on a computer can be tampered with or changed, including EXIF data (there are programs for it) but I don’t think that’s what happened here.

I think people are looking at smaller versions of this photo and drawing conclusions from that, in addition to not trusting anything H&M say or do. It's good to question H&M because they're liars, but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

I always thought the photo that was supposed / said to be faked, was the one with the Queen smiling at the doll and Doris looking on.

 

[Cáca_Milis]

There's a Change. Org petition up and running for Scabies and everytime I try to post the link, the link for the previous thread comes up... WTAF

 

[Evangelina]

Imagine if certain elements of the press are reading here, like they do on that mother's place which doesn't like us sometimes.
Good I say.
The Harkles of course or their assistants read everything, it's amusing that they are not learning.
Meanwhile in StanAsylum, William teh racist is after POC Scobie.
We need to make these bingo ticket thingys, they are so predictable.

 

[mycockapoorules]

The trouble with lying is that it all eventually unravels and then you get found out. Mind you, my brother always told me: "the best thing about public school is that you learn how to lie effortlessly and rise above it". He's a bit of a tit at times, but he has a point. Certainly old Etonians seem to manage the trick quite effectively.

As the lovely Judge Judy would say...you need a good memory to lie!

 

[Scotch Mist]

I just found this on Quora