Harry and Meghan #123 Too scared to speak to Gan-Gan because he’s a pathetic little man

[Saskia69]

Apologies if these have already been shared, but some gems from the comments on Scoooby Doo’s Statue tweets…

Yes, people genuinely thought that Diana’s sister was Camilla. And yes, she officially is “Lili D”… is she designed to be the first royal rap artist?

 

[The Wicked Lady]

I was in WH Smith today and had a look for The Bench. You will be reassured to hear that I couldn't find it. I did consider asking an assistant, but I didn't want them to think it was popular. Plus they would have probably followed me around while I was trying to hide it.

 

[Pom Bear]

I've made a sleeping Ginge Gnome..complete with brown shoes with inside lifts

Back later or tomorrow I'm tired
I'm on page 6

 

[YeltsinsTank]

I always thought the photo that was supposed / said to be faked, was the one with the Queen smiling at the doll and Doris looking on.

View attachment 649536 q

This is another one that people think is a composite image, but I'm just not seeing anything out there that convinces me. The biggest version I could find was 2000x2000. I've uploaded some others here for reference.

Some people are trying to say that the picture with the horse is the real image and the figures were cut out and used to make the above photo with HMTQ, Megz etc. My mother has glaucoma and she was able to tell that the horse image is fake.

People are also skeptical because HMTQ has been seen in that outfit before. She has always recycled outfits and I don't see what the big deal is. The shadow on Haz's jacket next to the queen's blue sweater is a natural shadow consistent with lighting and the drape of his own jacket, and does not seem to be the result of a cutout. As for the height issue, Doria and Haz are standing a bit further away and Megz and Doria seem to be crouched down to see/show off the baby. The original wasn't full-length so it's impossible to know if Megs has slipped on some flats or not.

 

[mylifeisasillymoviefail]

I read stuff like this and I’m reminded of that great Texan saying when describing someone who’s full of talk but no action,“All Hat and No Cattle”. I think it sums up the Harkles perfectly.

I prefer "fur coat and no knickers" particularly in this context

 

[Churchill's Ghost]

And the advanced loons have started their game:

Post | Glob Lett

www.globlett.com

https://mobile.twitter.com/notnewtwiterite

duck.

If this were true, they are the greatest actors of their generation

 

[Popcornstein]

OK I just feel the need to leave this here because surely something isn't right?!

She's looking at him like Maleficent and he looks like he's not all there. What is up with this?

 

[YeltsinsTank]

OK I just feel the need to leave this here because surely something isn't right?!

She's looking at him like Maleficent and he looks like he's not all there. What is up with this?

View attachment 649795 q

That's a still shot from a video. The whole video looked weird. Haz looks bloated and confused, and Megz looks like they've filtered her face to death.

Finally, did Charles and Camilla wear the same clothes to Archies Christening that they wore for Prince Louis’s Christening? Why does this even matter? I have no idea, but let's look at it since twitter is claiming the outfits are one and the same.

Side by side, it’s yes and no. Camilla is wearing a completely different hat and dress. The Louis hat is larger, the dress has embroidery around the collar and ends of sleeves. The necklaces are also different. It’s possible that the earrings are the same. She also seems to have shorter hair in the Louis pic, or it’s not as fluffy. She was wearing the same shoes but they weren’t waterlogged.

Charles could very well be wearing the same jacket and even the same shirt, but the ties and hankies are different and so are the flowers. His hair has changed between photos. I can’t possibly guess about the shoes.

William looks cheeky in the Louis pic. In the Archie pic he looks like he just wants to GTFO.

 

[Just_me1954]

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...-skids-America.html?__twitter_impression=true

Traxemark bid for AW hits skids in America

 

[amethyst_unicorn]

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...ademark-bid-Archewell-hits-skids-America.html

Spoiler: Details of article within spoiler

"The Duke and Duchess of Sussex's plans for world domination have hit a stumbling block.

I can disclose that their plans to trademark their entertainment and charity empire have fallen foul of U.S. lawyers.

Prince Harry and Meghan applied to have their fundraising outfit, Archewell Foundation, and podcast firm, Archewell Audio, protected by company law in America. They sent documents to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office asking for the sole use of the terms.

But they've been told that the applications need clarification if they are to be made law. In the application for Archewell Audio, the couple said the company was for the 'creation, development, production and distribution of podcasts, audio programmes, music, and audio books'.

The office replied: 'Applicant must clarify that these are entertainment-based services.'

The application also said the firm would create: 'live podcast performances, live stage performances, live music performances, and live audio-book readings.' The office replied: 'Applicant must clarify these are entertainment-based services', as well as 'specify the nature of the 'live stage performances'.'

Trademark lawyers have also asked the couple's legal team to define the kind of web apps they wish to provide through the Archewell Foundation.

In documents issued on June 25, the office gave Harry and Meghan six months to respond, or both applications will be junked. A source close to the Sussexes told me last year: 'Archewell is going to be huge. Harry and Meghan will use it to support lots of causes that they feel passionately about. It will be a global organisation with international ambitions.'

The name Archewell originates from the Greek word arche, meaning source of action, which inspired the name of their son Archie Mountbatten- Windsor, two.

They had set up a similar 'not-for-profit' organisation, Sussex Royal, but were banned from using the word 'royal' when they quit official duties. They declared that they planned to become 'financially independent' members of the Royal Family.

Couldn't happen to a nicer couple

Sorry @Just_me1954 , posted just after you did - must have been pasting the article into the spoiler

 

[cosette]

Lady C seems nice enough and she is very erudite. I like her.
However, she's another example of a woman who for years has used the noble title of a man she was married to for only a short while.
The phrase "she's been dining out on that for years" is very appropriate here.

I like her too. She’s OTT and bold. She’s Everything that’s fun in a mature chick. As far as her title, well, everyone has to have a gimmick.

 

[freda19]

Yankee Walls latest video is interesting. She said she has really big news coming up in the next few days. In her video she talks about OS and MM, and all the crap she has had re their supporters reporting her channel and cancelling free speech. Can't wait to find out what is going on.

Keep us informed @Loolee .
I very rarely watch the videos due to lack of time so I love when people summarise juicy titbits from them.

OK, so I was reading a local paper on my lunch break and this story was in it.

Irish PR Mogul Declan Kelly Quits Charity After Drunken Behaviour At Gala

Declan Kelly, the Irish head of PR firm, Teneo, has left the board of a global charity after drunken behaviour at a Vax Live gala.

evoke.ie

An Irishman got drunk (well no tit Sherlock) at a party connected to haz and smeggy's vax gig and behaved badly.
Oh Declan, you norty little scamp. On the plus side his inappropriate behaviour was toward both women and men ... so to be fair to our Dec he is at least a sexual equality drunken pest. Sounds like he took the sex in Sussex too literally.
Apparently Obama sent him to Ireland for 2 years as his representative. Dems must truly be thick cunts. Imagine sending a bloke to Ireland for two years and expecting him to go back to Murica all fine and dandy and tee total. *shakes head*



Disclaimer : I'm Irish so I can diss us if I so choose.

 

[cosette]

Yikes, In just finished the last thread (which was awesome).
As to that video of mrs.6 behind DoC- Crap on toast, that is one of the most creepy things I have ever seen. She went from smirk to malevolent dagger eyes back to smirk in a heart beat - such hatred, as if possessed. Perhaps BP should consider an exorcist.

The sixes (as I recall from Sunday School 6 is the number of sin) have become boring, but it is the calm before the storm. That woman will never stop. We do have the bullying investigation and the ANL appeal to look forward to,

I am sticking around. There are so many smart, witty people on this group I would love to grab a pint with, my profanity skills have improved astronomically due to the creativity of Nuttynana and others. Thank you for that.

Where I live people take fireworks VERY seriously, so I am sucking down my 3rd espresso. Last night a fast moving thunder storm blew in, knocking over the tree which shades my bedroom, followed by 5 count them 5 hours of fireworks, it sounded like a war zone. I got to practice my newly improved profanity skills on a high level. My poor old dog is phobic; thank goodness for a drug called silleo- I had to dose him 2 times just to keep him sane. My sanity is long gone, so I stuck to martinis.

Same here! I hate fireworks. Non stop LOUD Sonic BOOMS!!! My Sheltie was losing his shite all night long. It was Hell...I tell ya...Bloody damn Hell! Martinis are definitely a girl’s best friend during these insane times. Cheers!

 

[freda19]

I was in WH Smith today and had a look for The Bench. You will be reassured to hear that I couldn't find it. I did consider asking an assistant, but I didn't want them to think it was popular. Plus they would have probably followed me around while I was trying to hide it.

Excellent. I was in both tesco and Asda and not a one to be seen in either store.

 

[Just_me1954]

https://www.12ft.io/https://www.dai...ademark-bid-Archewell-hits-skids-America.html

Spoiler: Details of article within spoiler

"The Duke and Duchess of Sussex's plans for world domination have hit a stumbling block.

I can disclose that their plans to trademark their entertainment and charity empire have fallen foul of U.S. lawyers.

Prince Harry and Meghan applied to have their fundraising outfit, Archewell Foundation, and podcast firm, Archewell Audio, protected by company law in America. They sent documents to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office asking for the sole use of the terms.

But they've been told that the applications need clarification if they are to be made law. In the application for Archewell Audio, the couple said the company was for the 'creation, development, production and distribution of podcasts, audio programmes, music, and audio books'.

The office replied: 'Applicant must clarify that these are entertainment-based services.'

The application also said the firm would create: 'live podcast performances, live stage performances, live music performances, and live audio-book readings.' The office replied: 'Applicant must clarify these are entertainment-based services', as well as 'specify the nature of the 'live stage performances'.'

Trademark lawyers have also asked the couple's legal team to define the kind of web apps they wish to provide through the Archewell Foundation.

In documents issued on June 25, the office gave Harry and Meghan six months to respond, or both applications will be junked. A source close to the Sussexes told me last year: 'Archewell is going to be huge. Harry and Meghan will use it to support lots of causes that they feel passionately about. It will be a global organisation with international ambitions.'

The name Archewell originates from the Greek word arche, meaning source of action, which inspired the name of their son Archie Mountbatten- Windsor, two.

They had set up a similar 'not-for-profit' organisation, Sussex Royal, but were banned from using the word 'royal' when they quit official duties. They declared that they planned to become 'financially independent' members of the Royal Family.

Couldn't happen to a nicer couple

Sorry @Just_me1954 , posted just after you did - must have been pasting the article into the spoiler

No problem

 

[vretch]

Thanks for the title @Rayne and for new thread and recap @Cassandra333.

They are indeed boring and predictable.
What is irritating is how organised it looks, its the full PR package of:
Social media monitoring and maintenance
Favorable articles being written
The constant covert attacks which always position the other side into needing to disprove negatives.

It's true that it's made of fail now, but it needs to be fixed IMO, the onslaught on Charles and Camilla will be immense on Charles ascension, the game of "recollections may vary" will enable the rehash of things which even now are a copious amount of established lies, misconstructions and half truths.

The Kate thing started with the stans:
Harry shunned Kate and told her to duck off so she had to leave when they walked after the funeral.
Kate was forbidden to attend the unveiling, because Diana favored Harry and would prefer Peg, so Harry had her removed.
Sounds deranged? Yes, but it spreads, reaches the MSM and if long enough being spread becomes "fact," and portrays the Palace and William as incompetent wimps, and that's the game since Charles and Diana.
IMO it's not naive at all.

There is one huge difference in my opinion from the Charles and Diana attacks and those of Kate and William and that is public support. For some reason, rightly or wrongly, Diana did manage to gain the support of the people against Charles. But with Kate and William the exact opposite is happening. The more they try to bring them down, the more the public are supporting them and calling the attacks out as bs. So far, attacking Kate and William is not working. The only people listening are her sugars who blindly follow her anyway so for me they do not show the true picture. Kate and William will be fine. I have gained so much respect for William in particular. In every situation going back to his “we are definitely not a racist family” to not letting Harry get anything over him at the unveiling, he has been brilliant. He is gaining popularity in droves so far so good.

For some reason every now and again obvious suger tweets turn up in my Twitter account. I had it happen again yesterday so I spend time blocking them. But I did read some of them and honestly these sugars are absolutely deranged and stupid. They absolutely make things up. They see things that are literally not there. They are getting desperate to find anything to make their girl look good. They seem obsessed to believe that Hazno and Megabitch are happy and madly in love. Kate and William are on the brink of divorce. Poor little darlings, they are in for a huge shock when H&M hit the scids. It must be wonderful to live in a bubble of delusion.

 

[vretch]

No problem

Well at least he didn’t scratch his balls.

 

[Chilli pepper 19]

Well at least he didn’t scratch his balls.

He can't because Merkin still has them

 

[Asshats]

I’ve just watched some of a River video on YouTube (the one where he talks about Liz Jones and her column) and got to wondering who he is? Why is he on the frow at London fashion week? I found that he does ASMR on YouTube as a side gig, but who is he? I can’t find anything other than his channel. Is anyone here an A grade sleuther?

 

[Scotch Mist]

And the advanced loons have started their game:

Post | Glob Lett

www.globlett.com

https://mobile.twitter.com/notnewtwiterite

duck.

What does this mean?

"If your feminism doesn't call out the racism of white women like Kate Middleton who weaponized their white woman tears, it is not feminism."

Makes no sense to me at all. Surely the professional victim is Smeagol who tries to make everyone feel sorry for her people who write tit like this are crazy