No it's fine she may just be severely introverted or shy. Maybe some people would see your lifestyle of hardcore partying jumping from relationship to relationship maniacally popping out kids to be sad and unfulfilled. I don't see anything wrong with her she just comes off as a bit too normal for me (very sure of herself, I can see her picking up on things other people won't so maybe why they fired her). But bashing someone's life or how they live is just gross.
You presumably understand that there are basically infinite alternatives to any lifestyle and the inverse of the lifestyle being criticised in this thread isn’t “jumping form relationship to relationship maniacally popping out kids” (?). The vast majority of the population isn’t doing either of these things. But it’s pretty blatantly silly to suggest that doing basically nothing, having no partner, no children, no career, no social circle etc etc is in any way more fulfilling by objective standards than, like, having a family, or being a medical researcher, or working in a library, or creating art, or having a loving partner.
People who not only make a living from a public platform but actively talk about their lifestyle
as part of their content are completely fair game for criticism of that lifestyle, as long as it isn’t abusive. People can do what they like but it’s obviously and inescapably true that not all choices are equally wise, equally valuable to the individual or valuable to society.
---
Also - the person being discussed here is an influencer! Even if her lifestyle works for her, the act of normalising something that is destructive for most people is something worthy of criticism. Most people who have equivalent family, work, social and romantic situations aren’t earning a packet off social media and floating around on cruises, they’re anxious shut-ins fixating on their appearance who are reaching 25 and 30 unable to drive, with sub-teenage levels of agency, without any relationship experience and an increasingly dwindling friend group as their peers start having families and moving on.
That’s bad! I don’t have any qualms about saying it. Yeah it’s a choice, or downstream of choices, but not all choices are good ones! It is bad (sometimes to the point of being heartbreaking) for the individual, but when the proportion of people whose lives are like this reaches a certain point, it’s bad for everyone else too. Even leaving aside things like shortages of vital workers and population decline etc, you really do not want a meaningful minority of working age voters to have lived a life refracted through screens, with zero ability to truly understand important things about adult life.