Baby Reindeer Netflix #2

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1 Sort by date Sort by reaction score 2
judgejohndeed said:
‘Netflix’s Baby Reindeer Fan Club’. I’m not in it, I just noticed there was a girl liking all her posts who was sharing them into that group and slagging her off, and has also seemed to add her as a friend. Some of them seem just as nutty as Fiona.
Click to expand...
I'm surprised the group only has 76 members - actually that's quite reassuring that there's only a handful of people interested enough in facebook stalking Fiona openly
 
The "miss you like crazy" song post - she has to be having us on 🥴🥴🥴🥴
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240430-104517_Facebook.jpg
    Screenshot_20240430-104517_Facebook.jpg
    43.7 KB · Views: 12
Erm…erm…erm…cos i love it said:
Still catching up on this thread but it’s all very bizarre isn’t it!
I enjoyed the programme found it quite thought provoking at times. But there’s so much other stuff around it that’s come out in the last week.

The Martha being changed from the real Martha surely Netflix have a strong legal team that would look into this and decide on anything that’s too Close could get them into trouble. Or they would have spoke to her other people to check these accounts are true if they are saying based on a True story. Maybe even paid her off?

As for him saying she won’t recognise herself I don’t think he necessarily meant because he changed things more that she doesn’t accept what she did so won’t see that this was her and what she did to him.

I think the Fiona woman is definitely enjoying the attention or she would have set her socials to private as soon as she started getting abuse ( I know I would!)

Abbey Clancy must be thinking WTF have I been dragged into this crazy tit show for?

I find it quite interesting how there’s a lot more focus on the stalker than the SA
Click to expand...
Would she have a legal case? He didn’t name her, even though she was easy to find. She is clearly a stalker and deranged.
 
Libbylulu said:
Didn’t she beat up Teri and rip her hair out in patches. Surely that’s when it should have been reported. There was evidence beyond the stalking
Click to expand...

Well, no one amongst the tv audience knows whether that happened or not, or what evidence there was.

Perhaps the attack did happen, or perhaps it was a scene added for dramatic/narrative purposes. Perhaps ‘Terri’ doesn’t exist and is a mash-up of various people he dated but serves a handy narrative purpose as a composite character. We don’t know. The tv show is not ‘evidence’ of anything. 🤷‍♀️
 


Today's Rest is Entertainment podcast has a good insight into this from the Industry side of things.

Richard Osman states as fact that the "Darrian " is known in the industry because the person's real name was used in RG's shows. He also said it is absolutely not the guy originally named by Internet sleuths (the one who had stepped down from his current show and I can't remember his name and dont have tome to scroll back through the thread right now!)
 
ButtonDownTheHutches said:
Well, no one amongst the tv audience knows whether that happened or not, or what evidence there was.

Perhaps the attack did happen, or perhaps it was a scene added for dramatic/narrative purposes. Perhaps ‘Terri’ doesn’t exist and is a mash-up of various people he dated but serves a handy narrative purpose as a composite character. We don’t know. The tv show is not ‘evidence’ of anything. 🤷‍♀️
Click to expand...
I noticed Fiona has stayed very quiet on this…if I personally was depicted as carrying out a violent attack after making racist comments when I hadn’t in fact done that, THAT would be the part I’d be inclined to defend myself about. But she hasn’t said anything about it. Shes just saying she didn’t stalk Gadd or Laura Wray. That in itself makes me think it did happen.

She would be an idiot if she tried to bring a legal action - not even sure what action it would be for, Laura Wray had an injunction against her, Gadd hasn’t named her and there will be a police report, in fact if only she’d have shut up for 5 minutes and deactivated her account it all would’ve blown over. She identified herself and the more insane posts she makes the more she proves Gadd’s story IMO
 
CaptainHolt said:


Today's Rest is Entertainment podcast has a good insight into this from the Industry side of things.

Richard Osman states as fact that the "Darrian " is known in the industry because the person's real name was used in RG's shows. He also said it is absolutely not the guy originally named by Internet sleuths (the one who had stepped down from his current show and I can't remember his name and dont have tome to scroll back through the thread right now!)
Click to expand...

So it's not Sean Foley but it may be Gary Reich?
 
rosieflowers said:
So it's not Sean Foley but it may be Gary Reich?
Click to expand...
Neither name was mentioned however they were at pains to point out that someone was incorrectly named and that subsequently RG issued his statement. The second person who you Named was not discussed - as in they didn't go on to say "it isn't him either" they just spoke about the SF situation without naming him. If that makes sense.
---
The whole discussion is less that 15 minutes long and it's the first thing they talk about, well worth a listen if people are interested.
 
Serene Serena said:
7 followers and lots of selfies in the photos
Click to expand...

Just to add as an FYI for everyone, someone has set up a profile that's identical to hers with the flowers profile pic, but without the selfies going back a number of years and without the tagline ("Scottish, Lawyer, music" or something like that). Her real profile also doesn't have comments open. Amazing that some people will literally go out of their way to stalk the stalker to the point of pretending to be her online. Insanity.

Even if this whole toxic mess not a convoluted social experiment by Gadd and a crack media team, it is definitely going to nail someone a distinction for their Psych and Social degree dissertation.
 
CaptainHolt said:
Neither name was mentioned however they were at pains to point out that someone was incorrectly named and that subsequently RG issued his statement. The second person who you Named was not discussed - as in they didn't go on to say "it isn't him either" they just spoke about the SF situation without naming him. If that makes sense.
---
The whole discussion is less that 15 minutes long and it's the first thing they talk about, well worth a listen if people are interested.
Click to expand...

I feel bad for SF then, what a horrible thing to have levied at you just because you happened to leave your post at a certain time.
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top