Alice Evans & Ioan Gruffudd #260 The War of the Rolexes

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Ralphiegirl said:
I think that it's interesting when people say that - as there are some very long standing fan of IG in here. But when people say they aren't a fan, I think it shows the knowledge of Alices's abuse is becoming more 'mainstream'. But yes will agree that B is beautiful and I've always thought so... personally not a die hard fan of IG, but you lot have made me download Harrow and start watching... so watch this space.

OT - but my celebrity shag would be Cillian Murphy lol
Click to expand...

You should come visit me and we can walk my dog in Monkstown until himself makes a casual appearance 😊
 
I wonder if Ioan’s response is forthcoming ?

genuine Q for our imaginary lawyers and gurus - the claims Alice made in the RFO about the Rolex that have then spawned headlines and bad press, not only in the DM but I think others also picked it up - can she be done for perjury or whatever it might be? is there some legal recourse into her fake claims? It rather puts the rest of the RFO into doubt for the court doesn’t it?
 
BingoFlamingo said:
I wonder if Ioan’s response is forthcoming ?

genuine Q for our imaginary lawyers and gurus - the claims Alice made in the RFO about the Rolex that have then spawned headlines and bad press, not only in the DM but I think others also picked it up - can she be done for perjury or whatever it might be? is there some legal recourse into her fake claims? It rather puts the rest of the RFO into doubt for the court doesn’t it?
Click to expand...
It's not perjury because you cant prove that she just didnt made a genuine error (some people here thought the Rolex was Biancas too). It is however poor conduct to claim things without backing it up if you had the opportunity to check if your claims are true (by asking the other side for receipts etc), especially if they have zero relevance to the court proceedings. This is more of a issue for her lawyer though.

Perjury is more stuff like "Ioan has never provided anything since the seperation except of 5 payments" or "I earn only $ 20 despite doing cons for $60 per autograph" - these are pretty clear because even her own past filings contradict them, so one of her filings either way has perjury in them. But obviously Ioan's side would need to actively go against this, since Alice's competent lawyer opened the pandoras box of sanctions for "misconduct" (still laughing so hard) perhaps they should do this now.
 
welp said:
:LOL::ROFLMAO:
View attachment 3080759 qView attachment 3080760 qView attachment 3080761 qView attachment 3080762 qView attachment 3080763 q
Click to expand...
“That’s a dig about my mum. How DARE she post about her mum when she knows l was orphaned in my 30s!”.. Alice, probably.
---
Ralphiegirl said:
And spot him and jump his bones on a dog walk with a fellow turd 😂😂😂 I’m in!!!!
Click to expand...

Now we may have to walk in circles for days but sure, be worth it 😂

OT - Bianca is a bit of a badass eh?! 👏🏻
 
Last edited:
kingseven said:
If she was my daughter the bracelet would say ‘Where’s the damn book?’
Click to expand...

Remember when Alice made a post about getting this watch strap?

1722287781724.png


Where is the damn book, Alice? We're still waiting!
 
welp said:
It's not perjury because you cant prove that she just didnt made a genuine error (some people here thought the Rolex was Biancas too). It is however poor conduct to claim things without backing it up if you had the opportunity to check if your claims are true (by asking the other side for receipts etc), especially if they have zero relevance to the court proceedings. This is more of a issue for her lawyer though.

Perjury is more stuff like "Ioan has never provided anything since the seperation except of 5 payments" or "I earn only $ 20 despite doing cons for $60 per autograph" - these are pretty clear because even her own past filings contradict them, so one of her filings either way has perjury in them. But obviously Ioan's side would need to actively go against this, since Alice's competent lawyer opened the pandoras box of sanctions for "misconduct" (still laughing so hard) perhaps they should do this now.
Click to expand...
I use “perjury” loosely (as I am not a lawyer) but there must be some recourse he has here. Or Bianca for that matter.
 
I’ve had this song in my head since describing to Mr Flamingo about the latest antics and I mentioned Food Stamp Fatty. So calling @kingseven to add this to the playlist:



Some of us oldies will remember this from its original release. It is also a requirement to dance in that exact same way to this song.

I may change the words though:
Food Stamp Fatty
Ah Food Stamp Fatty
For the rosé, rosé, rosé
 
She filed that fiction with Janina's help (who I hope is reevaluating that professional relationship) and not only is it an outright lie, it's a lie that caused the public to go after her ex and his lady for spending lavishly, something they clearly weren't doing. That was the intention, IMO. To cause them public humiliation.

Doesn't that potentially fall under coercive control to cause harm? Something listed in the DVRO?

I think that RFO filing was a big mistake.

MOO
 
Last edited:
Sending love to all Tattle Turds going through tough times--right there with ya. They say God (or the universe, or whatever floats your boat) doesn't put anything on your shoulders you are unable to bear, but personally it's gotten to the point where God must think I'm a linebacker. 😂💀 Sending strength to all. You've got this!

I haven't gotten the chance to catch up, but came here to mention what a great post Bianca made; what a fantastic way to put paid to the "Rolex" rumor trash fire started by Alice and fanned by the DM! Brava! 👏🏼
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top