Zoe Sugg #62 It's all happy Deyes over here, oh not you Zoe you're a Sugg!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
MeghanSnarkle said:
Oh goodness I think I must be missing the point or just totally confused lol

So are they saying 2 year old Ottie and her image being public is safe from preying eyes and harm online but 4 year old Ottie will have changed so much that she will be at risk ?
If the aim is for both girls to have privacy and be safe by school age surely don't show them from birth, no
Click to expand...
I think they are coming from being seen out and about when Ottie is older and when she is at school etc BUT what about all of Otties content now and that pedos that could see it etc don't they care about that!
 
coconochanel said:
I think they are coming from being seen out and about when Ottie is older and when she is at school etc BUT what about all of Otties content now and that pedos that could see it etc don't they care about that!
Click to expand...
Exactly
'pedos can view Ottie and her new sister until they're four then we'll faze them out of the vlogs at school age'
'i won't share the girls images on the gram when they're at school but pedos can view them now that's fine'
I'll say no more on it but I thought they were talking shite tbh.
 
Nothing to do with privacy! They are getting as much money out of them now before they reach an age where they don't want a camera shoved in their faces 24/7 and can say no to being filmed and put on the internet. If they cared about her privacy that much they wouldn't have put Ottie out there full stop. They are full of tit.
 
now we're back to advertising dog food, she really will take anything wont she lol, no shame

NOOOOO not zoe saying 'cant wait to see what tattoo you get for me' (clearly jealous alfie got a tattoo for their daughter and not about her) and alfie just smiling LOL he has no intention of getting a tattoo for her
 
Last edited:
I don't think Alfie was being mean I think he's used these questions to tell her what he really thinks. He thinks she's not ambitious, lazy and weak. He wants her to do better but how do you tell someone that in a nice way? I think he tried his best. He won't stay with her if she doesn't get the hints he's giving.
 
There’s a way to do boring vlogs right without your audience snoozing off but they just can’t figure out how to do it can they? If they both cut out the chatting to the camera for 15 mins segments out and replaced it with fun b-roll or a well done ad that actually took time and effort, I reckon people would be less fed up with the vlogs. Like nobody wants to watch someone chatting tit for 15 mins putting on makeup in 2023
 
Clubroyahls said:
Has anyone noticed they do very adult things with Ottie. The strawberry picking with all adults, going to the garden centre etc. Shouldn't she be on a bouncy castle in the garden, swimming, going to the zoo, play dates, to the park etc.
Click to expand...
Zoe can't make it all about herself if she treats Ottie like the 2? year old she is, her only personality trait is buying expensive tat from places
 
MeghanSnarkle said:
I actually found it strangely odd like why show her from birth then ? Why is now fine but later isn't ? the older she gets the more she can consent to surely so I think based on what they said it should start now and new baby should be announced with nothing more than tiny hands or toes image I know these two think they are a super bright super cool parenting team but if she's being slowly taken out of vlogs at 3 or 4 then just start as you mean to go on and give both girls total privacy from the start imo.
Click to expand...
Yeah like what Tanya does with her kid..but really if you’re going to the effort of taking photos of the back of their head and their feet, just go the bit extra and not post anything instead of “dangling the carrot” so to speak. I could respect someone who said from the start, that there will be no photos out of respect for the child’s privacy instead of the stupid cryptic feet or emoji over the face. Like don’t have a toe in both camps to get freebies and content, if they’re truly going to respect their privacy they should not show them at all and maybe even stopping vlogging at their home (the content is dull anyway).
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top