Zoe Sugg #62 It's all happy Deyes over here, oh not you Zoe you're a Sugg!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1

coconochanel

VIP Member
New Thread and surprisingly Alfie is to thank for this thread title :ROFLMAO: . Anyway update if anyone gives a damn.....

We are 17 days into Vlogust and it is boring us to death!
They are showing how little parenting they do but somehow they are run off their feet:unsure:
Zoe has done her make up in nearly every vlog and TBH not very much else! but she is Pregnant so you cant expect her to actually do anything!
BFF Mark came over and they went to Homesense to buy Halloween stuff
Zoe & Alfie went into the laines to show us some independent shops (prob the best vlog so far!)
Zoe's mum has been on babysitting duty nearly everyday.
and Alfie cant help giving back handed compliments to that useless woman he calls a GF.
 
Havin a catch up and have just found my nightmare fuel, thanks Zoe xx
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4610.png
    IMG_4610.png
    150 KB · Views: 167
I'm honestly not trying to enter a minefield this is just me musing but i've just sat and watching all of last night's mammoth vlog and when they discuss Ottie's online presence and say once she starts school she'll be fazed out of our vlogs you'll no longer see her once she heads out into the world Alfie added there will be no pictures of her on the gram etc
I actually found it strangely odd like why show her from birth then ? Why is now fine but later isn't ? the older she gets the more she can consent to surely so I think based on what they said it should start now and new baby should be announced with nothing more than tiny hands or toes image I know these two think they are a super bright super cool parenting team but if she's being slowly taken out of vlogs at 3 or 4 then just start as you mean to go on and give both girls total privacy from the start imo.
 
They made the decision with fazing her out at around school age so she’s not recognisable once she’s out and about socialising etc
I'm honestly not trying to enter a minefield this is just me musing but i've just sat and watching all of last night's mammoth vlog and when they discuss Ottie's online presence and say once she starts school she'll be fazed out of our vlogs you'll no longer see her once she heads out into the world Alfie added there will be no pictures of her on the gram etc
I actually found it strangely odd like why show her from birth then ? Why is now fine but later isn't ? the older she gets the more she can consent to surely so I think based on what they said it should start now and new baby should be announced with nothing more than tiny hands or toes image I know these two think they are a super bright super cool parenting team but if she's being slowly taken out of vlogs at 3 or 4 then just start as you mean to go on and give both girls total privacy from the start imo.
 
I'm honestly not trying to enter a minefield this is just me musing but i've just sat and watching all of last night's mammoth vlog and when they discuss Ottie's online presence and say once she starts school she'll be fazed out of our vlogs you'll no longer see her once she heads out into the world Alfie added there will be no pictures of her on the gram etc
I actually found it strangely odd like why show her from birth then ? Why is now fine but later isn't ? the older she gets the more she can consent to surely so I think based on what they said it should start now and new baby should be announced with nothing more than tiny hands or toes image I know these two think they are a super bright super cool parenting team but if she's being slowly taken out of vlogs at 3 or 4 then just start as you mean to go on and give both girls total privacy from the start imo.

another influencer recently took their child off of social media and when asked “why bother now?” They said it’s because she’ll change so much, she’ll look completely different in years to come and I think that’s Zoe and Alfie’s thinking. 3 year old O while look different to say 5 year old O 🤷🏻‍♀️
---
Anyone else think it was really sad that they said O loves rainbows yet they only dress her in beige 😓
 
another influencer recently took their child off of social media and when asked “why bother now?” They said it’s because she’ll change so much, she’ll look completely different in years to come and I think that’s Zoe and Alfie’s thinking. 3 year old O while look different to say 5 year old O 🤷🏻‍♀️
---
Anyone else think it was really sad that they said O loves rainbows yet they only dress her in beige 😓
Oh goodness I think I must be missing the point or just totally confused lol

So are they saying 2 year old Ottie and her image being public is safe from preying eyes and harm online but 4 year old Ottie will have changed so much that she will be at risk ?
If the aim is for both girls to have privacy and be safe by school age surely don't show them from birth, no
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top