Zara McDermott #4 Liar liar fake tits on fire, promoting ED’s to those who admire

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
1
Aemee00 said:
I think this hits the nail on the head there. Creating and distributing a sexual image of a child is illegal (as it was in the 70s) but the problem here is Zara created the image herself and distributed it. So technically she broke the law relating to the creation and distrubtion of child pornography. The boy received the image with Zara's consent. Not saying it was right of him to distribute it further and it is a shame he got away with it. I think @santas_little_helper was just explaining why he got away scott free.

Certain areas of law are a very grey area hence the new 2015 Act being brought into force to legislate revenge porn.
Click to expand...
Exactly, thank you, that what I’ve been saying but have been shouted down for lol. I love a debate so all good.

The irony is that revenge porn was NOT a statutory offence at the time this happened to Zara, but a minor producing and sharing naked images of themselves constituted child pornography. Which is why Zara was visited by the police.

Do I agree with that, no, she was a child who needed support.

The revenge porn law came into effect in 2015 so there would be a different outcome if it happened today.

Zara said herself that she suddenly realised she was the victim in 2015 when the law came into effect. Until 2015 she felt guilty and that she had done wrong.

I wonder why she didn’t prosecute the 2018 guy? Anyway, what a minefield 🤣
 
Wtf is wrong with anyone trying to justify a teenage girls naked photos being spread around a school (and beyond). Absolutely vile, I dont care if it was legal/illegal, morally its reprehensible and just because the revenge porn law didn't exist then doesn't mean it shouldn't have existed. Honestly rethink your life if you hate someone you don't even know that much you're trying to defend both their old school for blaming the victim in the situation and the teenage boy who shared her intimate photos who definitely should have known better.
 
santas_little_helper said:
Exactly, thank you, that what I’ve been saying but have been shouted down for lol. I love a debate so all good.

The irony is that revenge porn was NOT a statutory offence at the time this happened to Zara, but a minor producing and sharing naked images of themselves constituted child pornography. Which is why Zara was visited by the police.

Do I agree with that, no, she was a child who needed support.

The revenge porn law came into effect in 2015 so there would be a different outcome if it happened today.

Zara said herself that she suddenly realised she was the victim in 2015 when the law came into effect. Until 2015 she felt guilty and that she had done wrong.

I wonder why she didn’t prosecute the 2018 guy? Anyway, what a minefield 🤣
Click to expand...
Agreed. I didn’t know it happened in 2018 too though. I will have to look that up. So she actually sent nudes again??
 
Babysnark said:
Wtf is wrong with anyone trying to justify a teenage girls naked photos being spread around a school (and beyond). Absolutely vile, I dont care if it was legal/illegal, morally its reprehensible and just because the revenge porn law didn't exist then doesn't mean it shouldn't have existed. Honestly rethink your life if you hate someone you don't even know that much you're trying to defend both their old school for blaming the victim in the situation and the teenage boy who shared her intimate photos who definitely should have known better.
Click to expand...
We didn’t make the law. Agree, the little tit who passed the images on deserved an almighty bollocking, which he probably got from his teachers and parents.

xcxcx87 said:
Agreed. I didn’t know it happened in 2018 too though. I will have to look that up. So she actually sent nudes again??
Click to expand...
Just before she went on love island she was dumped. This guy shared those images when she was in the villa and she found out when she got out. Those images are still online. Makes you wonder why she didn’t prosecute him, he’d have been over 18 ... bizarre.
 
santas_little_helper said:
We didn’t make the law. Agree, the little tit who passed the images on deserved an almighty bollocking, which he probably got from his teachers and parents.
Click to expand...
We aren’t justifying it are we!!!! My bad if it comes across that we are. Anyway have just read about her being suicidal at 14 because she sent them photos which is understandable but she did it again in 2018. Wow I did not know she did that and then she made a documentary about it after. Anyway let’s move on we have all had our say haven’t we . Some people obviously are more sensitive than other
 
I am glad the law has changed now, the difference is that she sent it with her consent, he distributed it without hers which is vile. I think although there is still a lot of pressure nowadays so not minimising that, more is known about the fact that the person you trusted can circulate them etc than it was several years ago when it happened to her, so people can make more informed decisions. Although I find her really irritating and the way she is quite happy for Sam to humiliate her really, it's great she has worked to raise awareness of it.
 
xcxcx87 said:
We aren’t justifying it are we!!!! My bad if it comes across that we are. Anyway have just read about her being suicidal at 14 because she sent them photos which is understandable but she did it again in 2018. Wow I did not know she did that and then she made a documentary about it after. Anyway let’s move on we have all had our say haven’t we . Some people obviously are more sensitive than other
Click to expand...
That wasn’t aimed at you btw I replied to wrong comment
 
Pobbles said:
I am glad the law has changed now, the difference is that she sent it with her consent, he distributed it without hers which is vile. I think although there is still a lot of pressure nowadays so not minimising that, more is known about the fact that the person you trusted can circulate them etc than it was several years ago when it happened to her, so people can make more informed decisions. Although I find her really irritating and the way she is quite happy for Sam to humiliate her really, it's great she has worked to raise awareness of it.
Click to expand...
Agree - raising awareness is great and if she gets school children talking about this then bravo x

I’ve been in law since I was 19 and my god, it’s frustrating and so many grey areas, but super interesting x

Babysnark said:
Wtf is wrong with anyone trying to justify a teenage girls naked photos being spread around a school (and beyond). Absolutely vile, I dont care if it was legal/illegal, morally its reprehensible and just because the revenge porn law didn't exist then doesn't mean it shouldn't have existed. Honestly rethink your life if you hate someone you don't even know that much you're trying to defend both their old school for blaming the victim in the situation and the teenage boy who shared her intimate photos who definitely should have known better.
Click to expand...
Absolutely what we have been saying. “Doesn’t mean it shouldn’t have existed” .... agree .... which is why the new law of 2015 was brilliant. Zara herself said that was the moment she didn’t feel responsible anymore, she realised she was the victim.
 
Babysnark said:
Wtf is wrong with anyone trying to justify a teenage girls naked photos being spread around a school (and beyond). Absolutely vile, I dont care if it was legal/illegal, morally its reprehensible and just because the revenge porn law didn't exist then doesn't mean it shouldn't have existed. Honestly rethink your life if you hate someone you don't even know that much you're trying to defend both their old school for blaming the victim in the situation and the teenage boy who shared her intimate photos who definitely should have known better.
Click to expand...
I'm definitely not justifying it, I was explaining why he got away with it and wasn't prosecuted.
 
xcxcx87 said:
Just seen sams post she is so bloody fame gingery and he is just annoying


Hungry haha
Click to expand...
She won't even give a tit that her documentary will educate young woman. The highlight of this documentary is her being on the cover of a magazine and on TV again lol.
I hope she doesn't try to become the next Megan Barton Hanson now she's had a tit job and done a documentary about revenge porn. Thinking she can empower women and all that
 
Aemee00 said:
She won't even give a tit that her documentary will educate young woman. The highlight of this documentary is her being on the cover of a magazine and on TV again lol.
I hope she doesn't try to become the next Megan Barton Hanson now she's had a tit job and done a documentary about revenge porn. Thinking she can empower women and all that
Click to expand...
Totally agree it is all about her getting coverage and her face being on tv. She has nothing to give no personality nothing. She is winnet on sams arse that girl. Wait till lockdown is over and he cheats in her. It’s inevitable
 
Under the 1970s law it doesn’t matter if she consented or made the pictures herself, it was still a criminal offense to distribute them.

We don’t know why he didn’t get prosecuted but really what’s the point in charging a 14 year old child with anything?
 
Babysnark said:
Wtf is wrong with anyone trying to justify a teenage girls naked photos being spread around a school (and beyond). Absolutely vile, I dont care if it was legal/illegal, morally its reprehensible and just because the revenge porn law didn't exist then doesn't mean it shouldn't have existed. Honestly rethink your life if you hate someone you don't even know that much you're trying to defend both their old school for blaming the victim in the situation and the teenage boy who shared her intimate photos who definitely should have known better.
Click to expand...
Justifying and explaining are different. Nobody is defending anyone as far as I could tell reading through, merely explaining why Zara's situation played out legally the way it did. Honestly I don't know why there are so many getting so heated over this in this thread... if it's a subject close to home then that's understandable but if so then discussing it with strangers online is never gonna end well, enevitably it'll be triggering and everyone has their own opinions on the topic.

Anyway this is a Zara thread not a bloody revenge porn thread but while on the subject I have to point out that the back and forth about it surrounding Zara is exactly why I agree with others that have said she's the wrong voice for it, the recent comments on this thread are a great example of why she's counterproductive to revenge porn being taken seriously as a real issue, which it is. She doesn't provoke positive discussion that enables the issue to be taken seriously or discussed well, because she hasn't been an active advocate for it (until the doc) and her lifestyle actively advocates against highlighting it as an issue which seems to make people believe anyone speaking against her on this issue or her contrary behaviour is just clouded by their dislike for her but it isn't as simple as that.
 
Dwight said:
Justifying and explaining are different. Nobody is defending anyone as far as I could tell reading through, merely explaining why Zara's situation played out legally the way it did. Honestly I don't know why there are so many getting so heated over this in this thread... if it's a subject close to home then that's understandable but if so then discussing it with strangers online is never gonna end well, enevitably it'll be triggering and everyone has their own opinions on the topic.

Anyway this is a Zara thread not a bloody revenge porn thread but while on the subject I have to point out that the back and forth about it surrounding Zara is exactly why I agree with others that have said she's the wrong voice for it, the recent comments on this thread are a great example of why she's counterproductive to revenge porn being taken seriously as a real issue, which it is. She doesn't provoke positive discussion that enables the issue to be taken seriously or discussed well, because she hasn't been an active advocate for it (until the doc) and her lifestyle actively advocates against highlighting it as an issue which seems to make people believe anyone speaking against her on this issue or her contrary behaviour is just clouded by their dislike for her but it isn't as simple as that.
Click to expand...
Agree 💯%

I would make fun of her lazy eye but I get told off for that too 🤣🤣🤣
 
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
Back
Top