Please read this
By that logic my 4 year old could have took a naked picture of herself just playing about with my phone taking selfies like she does (not naked obv but could happen) if she then accidentally sent this to someone in my phone book and they uploaded it to a child porn site then they would be blameless previous to this act coming into play?
No, of course not. That’s not revenge porn.
David David David!!!
I noticed this earlier too but I wasn't sure if it was because the magazine has her covered up!
Just a joke to lighten the mood
I assumed since she was classed as a child at the time that it would be him sharing child porn because she was under 16 which is when it is no longer considered child pornography.
I think this hits the nail on the head there. Creating and distributing a sexual image of a child is illegal (as it was in the 70s) but the problem here is Zara created the image herself and distributed it. So technically she broke the law relating to the creation and distrubtion of child pornography. The boy received the image with Zara's consent. Not saying it was right of him to distribute it further and it is a shame he got away with it. I think @santas_little_helper was just explaining why he got away scott free.
I can see both points and regardless of the law that boy was also 14 and naieve. Both the same age so both were in the wrong. She knew what she was doing and so did he laws aside and it was dealt with and now she is bringing it back up by doing a documentary which is stir enough but she is still sexualising herself constantly and yes she is an adult now and knows what she is doing etc but both of them were kids when this happened
Good for you. You put your point across we got it but everyone has an opinion and in my eyes there is no victim blaming here they were both children and none of it was right and no one has said that they were just putting their point of view across but if you didn’t like it then probably best to unfollow isn’t itPlease read this
Protection of Children Act 1978
An Act to prevent the exploitation of children by making indecent photographs of them; and to penalise the distribution, showing and advertisement of such indecent photographs.www.legislation.gov.uk
honestly enjoyed this thread when Zara was breaking rules and pretending she wasn’t in the Maldives but will not stand for this. The victim blaming and ignorance is disgusting. Wont be following this thread anymore
It’s quite interesting if that is the case that the images can’t be criminalised but a 14 year old boy can be prosecuted for rape if he sleeps with a 14 year old girl. Or that’s the case in Scotland so maybe our laws are different and that’s where my confusion lies.
Walliams in a wig what a state
