Ooh on the social media point. I found the Minerva manual I was talking about -
link here. If you jump to the section “Guidelines on Anonymous Postings on Social Media”, they have a whole weird spiel about how one of their principles is
Being Authentic
, and how they don't want Minerva students to vent using anonymous accounts. Understandable if it's an anonymous account being used to target a student... but what I think this rule is actually getting at is that if you criticise Minerva anonymously, and they find out, you can be punished. Which is actually pretty insidious - what university has this kind of rule? Why should students be punished for venting about Minerva, anonymously or not?