I have finally caught up. You girls and guys have been busy!
Blueskies? Where have you gone?
I have been rather busy this last week or so. Having now caught up I can honestly say that Tiffany is a true emotional energy leech. She plays with her subscriber's emotions and even plays with the emotions of many on this very forum. T puts out a sad eyes video and some nonsense about having a realization and it upsets people? Tiffanys known for months what her surgery entails.
Yes, she will likely need chemo after surgery. Cells escape during surgery and chemo will prevent them 'bedding in' and tumors forming. T will need scans every 3 months for the foreseeable future if her grade is indeed aggressive.
How can a 30-year-old woman discuss being cancer-free, not discussing cancer again etc, and then put out a video within a few hours stating she made need chemo and surgery likely won't be the end for her?
She's a puppet master.
When my husband was admitted for his high-risk surgery, I was allowed to stay in a private room (I paid £25 a day) in the same building where my husband was in the ICU. During my stay there I made sure all our family, friends, and online friends I had made from kidney cancer forums was updated whenever I got an update. It's part of being a caregiver and providing care/support when the patient can't. My husband had fellow patients and their caregivers/friends/partners rooting for him worldwide. No way would I have not updated them!!!!! There is no good reason as to why amma. matt or one of T's family can not give an update. Amma could pick up the camera when T was in the hospital with C diff. I remember it crystal clear Amma picked up the camera, walked over to T, and said "Tiffany is sleeping", at the time I found it bizarre, but it showed me Amma is capable.
T & family want people's prayers, 'cards & notes', presents to her paid for PO BOX etc, and not one of them can give a simple update?
People worrying T won't make it and she might die because she is weak? I would love for anyone of them to spend just one day with a 'weak' patient. T is far from weak.
The way T and her family treat T's subscribers truly disgusts me. I feel sorry for those that are worried about Tiffany.
At the royal marsden the surgeon wouldn't have offered surgery if T was stage 4. This was also mentioned again just a few months ago that if it spread while she was on 'watch and wait', she would then be inoperable. Her current surgeon was taking the same stance as St Georges. T's surgeon cracked on with surgery because she isn't stage 4.
No surgeon 'came along'. St Georges referred T to him. There has been no second opinions or T seeking any doctor out.
And yet, the same incorrect story is still being repeated?
Blueskies? Where have you gone?
I have been rather busy this last week or so. Having now caught up I can honestly say that Tiffany is a true emotional energy leech. She plays with her subscriber's emotions and even plays with the emotions of many on this very forum. T puts out a sad eyes video and some nonsense about having a realization and it upsets people? Tiffanys known for months what her surgery entails.
Yes, she will likely need chemo after surgery. Cells escape during surgery and chemo will prevent them 'bedding in' and tumors forming. T will need scans every 3 months for the foreseeable future if her grade is indeed aggressive.
How can a 30-year-old woman discuss being cancer-free, not discussing cancer again etc, and then put out a video within a few hours stating she made need chemo and surgery likely won't be the end for her?
She's a puppet master.
When my husband was admitted for his high-risk surgery, I was allowed to stay in a private room (I paid £25 a day) in the same building where my husband was in the ICU. During my stay there I made sure all our family, friends, and online friends I had made from kidney cancer forums was updated whenever I got an update. It's part of being a caregiver and providing care/support when the patient can't. My husband had fellow patients and their caregivers/friends/partners rooting for him worldwide. No way would I have not updated them!!!!! There is no good reason as to why amma. matt or one of T's family can not give an update. Amma could pick up the camera when T was in the hospital with C diff. I remember it crystal clear Amma picked up the camera, walked over to T, and said "Tiffany is sleeping", at the time I found it bizarre, but it showed me Amma is capable.
T & family want people's prayers, 'cards & notes', presents to her paid for PO BOX etc, and not one of them can give a simple update?
People worrying T won't make it and she might die because she is weak? I would love for anyone of them to spend just one day with a 'weak' patient. T is far from weak.
The way T and her family treat T's subscribers truly disgusts me. I feel sorry for those that are worried about Tiffany.
Why do you and others say no other surgeon would take T's case on? I ask because I am curious as to why this keeps being repeated? St Georges (Tiffanys hospital where she was diagnosed) couldn't offer surgery because its not a surgery that's offered at St George's. They also pointed out that they didn't think T was operable because they believed T was stage 4, due to suspicious lung nodule. This is absolutely normal and would happen to all patients (not isolated to T's case). St Georges referred T to the Royal Marsden, which again is very normal.She likely heard her odds at diagnosis especially since no other surgeon would taker her case, before god surgeon came along. She admitted she didn't want surgery at first so she had a big part in the 1 yr delay. They Offered her other treatment options and she took them. When they didn't cure her she still dragged her feet so…
At the royal marsden the surgeon wouldn't have offered surgery if T was stage 4. This was also mentioned again just a few months ago that if it spread while she was on 'watch and wait', she would then be inoperable. Her current surgeon was taking the same stance as St Georges. T's surgeon cracked on with surgery because she isn't stage 4.
No surgeon 'came along'. St Georges referred T to him. There has been no second opinions or T seeking any doctor out.
And yet, the same incorrect story is still being repeated?
Last edited: